Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

2.69s

  • Kooshtard Property VIII, LLC v. Shelby County Assessor

    987 N.E.2d 1178 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 29, 2013

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden to demonstrate that it is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. Assessor, 938 N.E.2d 311, 313 (Ind. … Consequently, Kooshtard needed to present to the Indiana Board some type of relevant market based evidence to support its claim. See, e.g., Lake Cnty. Assessor v. U.S. Steel Corp., 901 N.E.2d 85, 93-94 (Ind.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Housing Partnerships, Inc. v. Owens

    10 N.E.3d 1057 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 6, 2014

    STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Tipton Cnty. Health Care Found. v. Tipton Cnty. … Housing Partnerships, as the party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination, bears the burden of establishing its invalidity. See Osolo Twp. Assessor v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brenner v. Hound Ears Club, Inc.

    2022 NCBC 47 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 31, 2022

    Brenner v. Hound Ears Club, Inc., 2022 NCBC 47. … Parks v. Venters Oil Co., 255 N.C. 498, 501 (1961) (quoting Brock v. Porter, 220 N.C. 28, 28 (1941)). 20.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. City of Fort Worth

    267 S.W. 681 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 20, 1924

    Dorsey v. Racine, 60 Wis. 292 , 18 N. W. 928 ; Frankel v. New York (Sup.) 2 N. Y. S. 294; Denver v. Saulcey, 5 Colo. App. 420 , 38 P. 1098 . … In the ease of Peterson v. Village of Cokato, 84 Minn. 205 , 87 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Shelby County Assessor v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 6637-02

    994 N.E.2d 350 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 23, 2013

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The Assessor, as the party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination, bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. See Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … P’ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1137 (Ind.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Linda D Donovan v. Clark County Assessor

    Indiana Tax Court · Dec 22, 2025

    See, e.g., Bougie v. Chapman, 244 N.E.3d 987, 991–92 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2024) (affirming Board’s value determination that relied on comparing recently-sold homes near the subject property); DuSablon v. … Because the Board’s findings in this case were not shown to be illegal, unsupported by evidence, or unconstitutional, the Court will not disturb the Board’s resulting determination. V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamstra Builders, Inc. v. Department of Local Government Finance

    783 N.E.2d 387 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 10, 2003

    ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Thousand Trails, Inc. v. … materials. 2 Miller Structures, Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Adams

    1 Posey 117 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 26, 1880

    The intimation by Judge Hemphill, in Garrett v. Gaines, 6 Tex., 446 , does not appear to have been followed in the actual practice. … Lawrence v. Underwood, 1 Tex., 48 ; Horan v. Wahrenberger, 9 Tex., 319 ; Castles v. Barney, 34 Tex., 470 . III. The refusal of the court to admit the power of attorney and deed named in third assignment.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Worley v. Moore

    2018 NCBC 113 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 2, 2018

    Worley v. Moore, 2018 NCBC 113. … E.g., Griffin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.

    2020 NCBC 35 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 27, 2020

    Brown & Williamson Transaction 76. On July 30, 2004, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. … Int’l, Inc. v. Mark Techs. Corp., 342 P.3d 761, 768 (Utah 2014); HMO-W Inc. v. SSM Health Care Sys., 667 N.W.2d 733, 735-36 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003); Brown v. Arp & Hammond Hardware Co., 141 P.3d 673, 677 (Wyo. 2006).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Putnam v. Sweep Rite, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 6, 2011

    "V. Rights and Duties of Subscriber . . . C. … Brown referred Plaintiff to a specialist in December 2007. 21. Plaintiff continued to treat with Dr. Brown through January 2009 wherein Plaintiff continued to experience severe back pain.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Atlantic City v. Trupos

    25 N.J. Tax 108 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 4, 2009

    of Taxation (“the Board”) challenging their 2009 tax assessments. … Cause by way of permitting an appeal from the County Board’s declining to act.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Wilmoth

    12 S.W.2d 972 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 23, 1929

    Moody v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. App.) 260 P. 967 . Section 7 of article 8306, R. … Western Indemnity Co. v. MacKechnie (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 456 ; Railway Co. v. Turner (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 868 ; Tel. & Tel. Co. v Andrews (Tex. Civ. App,) 169 S. W. 218 ; North v. Atlas Brick Co. (Tex. Civ.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Shevtsov v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 2015

    Jeff Brown (Brown) and Brandon MacNeil (MacNeil) appeared and testified on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2 was admitted without objection. … Plaintiff appealed that value to the county board of property tax appeals (board) and the board sustained the value. (Id.) In his Complaint to this court, Plaintiff requested a real market value of $4,500. (Id. at 3.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Commissioners' Court of Limestone County v. Garrett

    236 S.W. 970 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 25, 1922

    Clark v. Finley, 93 Tex. 178 , 54 S. W. 343 . … Bradford v. Justices, 33 Ga. 332 .

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • City of Eugene v. Department of Revenue

    15 Or. Tax 1 · Oregon Tax Court · May 12, 1998

    The Supreme Court addressed this issue in City of Portland v. … . *4 Hopper v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Levy, Morris v. City of Long Branch

    New Jersey Tax Court · May 8, 2023

    Co., Inc. v. City of Trenton, 29 N.J. … See Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hale, Sherry v. Prime Packaging & Label, LLC

    2015 TN WC 71 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2015

    Brown Shoe Company v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106, 350 S.W.2d 65 (1961). Black v. Raytheon Eng'rs. & Constructors, No. E 1998-211-WC-R3-CV, 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 38, *6-7 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. … The Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board outlined the procedure for compensability determinations under the Workers' Compensation Law in McCord. The Board, citing Lindsey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gabrielle Snyder v. Dearborn County Assessor

    Indiana Tax Court · Dec 13, 2024

    Corp. v. Lake Cnty. Assessor, 197 N.E.3d 1274, 1279 (Ind. … See Inland Steel Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 739 N.E.2d 201, 220 (Ind.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Howard County Assessor v. Kohl's Indiana LP

    57 N.E.3d 913 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 7, 2016

    P’ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1137 n.6 (Ind. … STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.