Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.69s
Kooshtard Property VIII, LLC v. Shelby County Assessor
987 N.E.2d 1178 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 29, 2013
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden to demonstrate that it is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. Assessor, 938 N.E.2d 311, 313 (Ind. … Consequently, Kooshtard needed to present to the Indiana Board some type of relevant market based evidence to support its claim. See, e.g., Lake Cnty. Assessor v. U.S. Steel Corp., 901 N.E.2d 85, 93-94 (Ind.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHousing Partnerships, Inc. v. Owens
10 N.E.3d 1057 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 6, 2014
STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Tipton Cnty. Health Care Found. v. Tipton Cnty. … Housing Partnerships, as the party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination, bears the burden of establishing its invalidity. See Osolo Twp. Assessor v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrenner v. Hound Ears Club, Inc.
2022 NCBC 47 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 31, 2022
Brenner v. Hound Ears Club, Inc., 2022 NCBC 47. … Parks v. Venters Oil Co., 255 N.C. 498, 501 (1961) (quoting Brock v. Porter, 220 N.C. 28, 28 (1941)). 20.
Cited 0 timesPublished267 S.W. 681 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 20, 1924
Dorsey v. Racine, 60 Wis. 292 , 18 N. W. 928 ; Frankel v. New York (Sup.) 2 N. Y. S. 294; Denver v. Saulcey, 5 Colo. App. 420 , 38 P. 1098 . … In the ease of Peterson v. Village of Cokato, 84 Minn. 205 , 87 N.
Cited 13 timesPublishedShelby County Assessor v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 6637-02
994 N.E.2d 350 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 23, 2013
STANDARD OF REVIEW The Assessor, as the party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination, bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. See Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … P’ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1137 (Ind.
Cited 9 timesPublishedLinda D Donovan v. Clark County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Dec 22, 2025
See, e.g., Bougie v. Chapman, 244 N.E.3d 987, 991–92 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2024) (affirming Board’s value determination that relied on comparing recently-sold homes near the subject property); DuSablon v. … Because the Board’s findings in this case were not shown to be illegal, unsupported by evidence, or unconstitutional, the Court will not disturb the Board’s resulting determination. V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHamstra Builders, Inc. v. Department of Local Government Finance
783 N.E.2d 387 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 10, 2003
ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the State Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Thousand Trails, Inc. v. … materials. 2 Miller Structures, Inc. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished1 Posey 117 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 26, 1880
The intimation by Judge Hemphill, in Garrett v. Gaines, 6 Tex., 446 , does not appear to have been followed in the actual practice. … Lawrence v. Underwood, 1 Tex., 48 ; Horan v. Wahrenberger, 9 Tex., 319 ; Castles v. Barney, 34 Tex., 470 . III. The refusal of the court to admit the power of attorney and deed named in third assignment.
Cited 1 timesPublished2018 NCBC 113 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 2, 2018
Worley v. Moore, 2018 NCBC 113. … E.g., Griffin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedReynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.
2020 NCBC 35 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 27, 2020
Brown & Williamson Transaction 76. On July 30, 2004, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. … Int’l, Inc. v. Mark Techs. Corp., 342 P.3d 761, 768 (Utah 2014); HMO-W Inc. v. SSM Health Care Sys., 667 N.W.2d 733, 735-36 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003); Brown v. Arp & Hammond Hardware Co., 141 P.3d 673, 677 (Wyo. 2006).
Cited 2 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 6, 2011
"V. Rights and Duties of Subscriber . . . C. … Brown referred Plaintiff to a specialist in December 2007. 21. Plaintiff continued to treat with Dr. Brown through January 2009 wherein Plaintiff continued to experience severe back pain.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Atlantic City v. Trupos
25 N.J. Tax 108 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 4, 2009
of Taxation (“the Board”) challenging their 2009 tax assessments. … Cause by way of permitting an appeal from the County Board’s declining to act.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Wilmoth
12 S.W.2d 972 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 23, 1929
Moody v. Industrial Accident Commission (Cal. App.) 260 P. 967 . Section 7 of article 8306, R. … Western Indemnity Co. v. MacKechnie (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 456 ; Railway Co. v. Turner (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 868 ; Tel. & Tel. Co. v Andrews (Tex. Civ. App,) 169 S. W. 218 ; North v. Atlas Brick Co. (Tex. Civ.
Cited 41 timesPublishedShevtsov v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Mar 2, 2015
Jeff Brown (Brown) and Brandon MacNeil (MacNeil) appeared and testified on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2 was admitted without objection. … Plaintiff appealed that value to the county board of property tax appeals (board) and the board sustained the value. (Id.) In his Complaint to this court, Plaintiff requested a real market value of $4,500. (Id. at 3.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCommissioners' Court of Limestone County v. Garrett
236 S.W. 970 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 25, 1922
Clark v. Finley, 93 Tex. 178 , 54 S. W. 343 . … Bradford v. Justices, 33 Ga. 332 .
Cited 28 timesPublishedCity of Eugene v. Department of Revenue
15 Or. Tax 1 · Oregon Tax Court · May 12, 1998
The Supreme Court addressed this issue in City of Portland v. … . *4 Hopper v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLevy, Morris v. City of Long Branch
New Jersey Tax Court · May 8, 2023
Co., Inc. v. City of Trenton, 29 N.J. … See Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHale, Sherry v. Prime Packaging & Label, LLC
2015 TN WC 71 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2015
Brown Shoe Company v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106, 350 S.W.2d 65 (1961). Black v. Raytheon Eng'rs. & Constructors, No. E 1998-211-WC-R3-CV, 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 38, *6-7 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. … The Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board outlined the procedure for compensability determinations under the Workers' Compensation Law in McCord. The Board, citing Lindsey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGabrielle Snyder v. Dearborn County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Dec 13, 2024
Corp. v. Lake Cnty. Assessor, 197 N.E.3d 1274, 1279 (Ind. … See Inland Steel Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 739 N.E.2d 201, 220 (Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoward County Assessor v. Kohl's Indiana LP
57 N.E.3d 913 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 7, 2016
P’ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1137 n.6 (Ind. … STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna