Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.52s

  • MEIJER STORES LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Smith

    926 N.E.2d 1134 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 26, 2010

    The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board's final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003). Discussion I. … Assessor v. Kimball Int'l Inc., 865 N.E.2d 732 , 739-40 n. 14 (Ind. Tax Ct.2007) (citation omitted).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Pruitt

    58 S.W.2d 41 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 22, 1933

    Under such a record, claimants should have presented to the. board both alleged injuries. Nichols v. … Nichols v. Dibrell, supra.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Martin

    1 Denio 602 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 15, 1845

    (Shannon v. Comstock, 21 Wend. 457 ; Heckscher v. McCrea, 24 id. 304.) … (Bracegirdle v. Heald, 1 Barn. & Ald. 723; Boydell v. Drummond, 11 East; 142; Drummond v. Burrell, 13 Wend. 307 .) These cases are directly in point, and are decisive against the action.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Roach

    222 S.W. 159 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 26, 1920

    The Court of Civil Appeals in this case, as well as in Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. House, 191 S. … Co. v. Curtis et al., 200 S. W. 1162 , and in Gen. Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. Evans, 201 S. W. 705 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ramos v. Wal-Mart

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 27, 2009

    Stat. § 97-25 ; Schofield v. Tea Co ., 299 N.C. 582 , 264 S.E.2d 56 (1980); Thompson v. Federal Express Ground , 175 N.C. App. 564 , 623 S.E.2d 811 (2006); Kanipe v. Lane Upholstery , 141 N.C. … Brown is not approved as reasonably necessary. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-25 ; Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980). 7.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: The Honorable Andy Fugate, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 94

    2026 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 2026

    Fund v. Stitt , 2026 OK 1 583 P.3d 280 2023 OK AG 5 See 2011 OK AG 11 Id. § 40(C). … Fund v. Wade , 2008 OK 15 180 P.3d 1205 60 O.S.2021, § 175.68 B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nova Tube Indiana II LLC v. Clark County Assessor

    101 N.E.3d 887 · Indiana Tax Court · May 18, 2018

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Simon DeBartolo Group, LP, 52 N.E.3d 65, 69-70 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2016); Big Foot Stores LLC v. Franklin Twp. Assessor, 919 N.E.2d 621, 625-26 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2009); O’Donnell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Patton v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

    36 S.W.2d 1000 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 1, 1931

    Southern Casualty Company v. Morgan (Tex. Com. App.) 12 S.W. (2d) 200 ; Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Henderson (Tex. Com. App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 565 ; Oilmen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Franklin, 116 Tex. 59 , 286 S. W. 195 . … Farmers Life Insurance Co., v. Wolters (Tex. Com. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 698 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • People v. Maksymenko

    105 Misc. 2d 368 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Sep 30, 1980

    (Brown v Texas, supra, at pp 50-51 ; Delaware v Prouse, 44 US 648 .) … (Brown v Texas, 443 US 47 , supra; People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tierney v. Reed Lallier Chevrolet

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 16, 2008

    The video shows plaintiff performing some limited tasks outside his son's business, such as lifting a screen printing board up in the air to look for imperfections and pulling pieces of masking tape off screen printing boards … Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 329 , 477 S.E.2d 197 , 2002 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Andrews

    34 Misc. 2d 432 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 25, 1962

    Div. 239 ; Livingston v. Gordon, 84 N. Y. 136 .) In holding Lucretia Shaffer entitled to the $500, I also hold that she is entitled to her proportionate share of the residue as one of the legatees named in the will. … Having disposed of Luella Cull as a potential remainderman, how about Lawrence Brown’s interest? Is it a vested or contingent remainder?

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grabbe v. Carroll County Assessor

    1 N.E.3d 226 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 31, 2013

    See, e.g., Inland Steel Co. v. … Hometowne Assocs., L.P. v. Maley, 839 N.E.2d 269, 275 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Idris v. Marion County Assessor

    12 N.E.3d 331 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 4, 2014

    Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 471 (Ind. … Because the majority of those items were not admitted into evidence during the Indiana Board hearing, the Court may not consider them on appeal. See, e.g., North Park Cinemas, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tally v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n

    48 S.W.2d 988 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 28, 1932

    Ass’n v. Neatherlin (Tex. Com. App.) 48 S.W.(2d) 967 , not yet reported [in State reports}. … Ass’n v. Neatherlin, supra.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In Re Larsen

    717 A.2d 39 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1998

    v. … See, e.g., Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v. Snyder, supra at 151, 523 A.2d at 298 .

    Vacated in part by In Re Appeal of Larsen, 571 Pa. 457 (2002)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Beck v. Wake Cty. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 1, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cranfill-Reynolds Co. v. Security Ins. Co.

    67 S.W.2d 258 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 24, 1934

    Co. v. Brannon, 99 Tex. 397 , 89 S. W. 1057, 1060 , 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 548, 13 Ann. Cas. 1020; Kelley v. Ward, 94 Tex. 295 , 60 S. W. 311, 313 . In Kelley v. … Inst. v. Burdick, 87 N.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Grant County Assessor v. Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, LLC

    955 N.E.2d 876 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 20, 2011

    ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Kimball Int’l, Inc., 865 N.E.2d 732, 739 (Ind.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Pollock

    3 Redf. 100 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1877

    In Price v. … In Bartley v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ogburn v. Ward County Irr. Dist. No. 1

    280 S.W. 169 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 10, 1926

    Board to Lower Property Value. … The defendant in error is not entitled to recover on the value placed on his property by .the board. Lively v. Railway Co., 120 S. W. 852 , 102 Tex. 545 ; Power v. Andrews (Tex. Civ. App.) 253 S. W. 870 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.