Case law

Whetzel v. Department of Local Government Finance

761 N.E.2d 904 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 17, 2002

See, e.g., State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs v. L.H. … not make a final determination because that County Board of Review never acted on or forwarded the Form 133 Petition for Correction of Errors to the State Board); State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs v.

Lawson v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2008

On August 30, 2006, plaintiff and defendants mediated plaintiff's workers' compensation claims at the office of plaintiff's former attorney, Michael Brown. … Lemly v. Colvard Oil Company , 157 N.C. App. 99 , 577 S.E. 2d 712 (2003). 2.

Blewett v. Richardson Independent School Dist.

240 S.W. 529 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 10, 1922

Co. v. Harrison County, 54 Tex. 119, 123 ; Clegg v. State, 42 Tex. 605, 607 ; 37 Cyc. 984; 22 R. C. L. p. 593, § 313. … S. arts. 942, 943, 947, and 949; Moody v. City of Galveston, 21 Tex. Civ. App. 16 , 50 S. W. 481 , 482; San Antonio v. Hoefling, 90 Tex. 511 , 39 S. W. 918 . They were afforded an opportunity to appear before the board.

Tipton County Health Care Foundation, Inc. v. Tipton County Assessor

961 N.E.2d 1048 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 16, 2012

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Endowment Corp. v. Lake Cnty. Prop. … See Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin. v.

In re the Estate of Brown

132 Misc. 2d 171 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 5, 1986

Brown has been convicted of second degree murder in connection with the death of the decedent. … Brown from obtaining the proceeds of the insurance are not applicable here. (Schwartz v Public Administrator, 24 NY2d 65 .) Cited by both sides is Duverney v State of New York ( 96 Misc 2d 898 ).

Switzerland County Assessor v. Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC

130 N.E.3d 672 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 15, 2019

The Court provided instructions in its opinion for recomputing Belterra’s assessments and remanded the matter to the Indiana Board. Id. at 909. See also Switzerland Cty. Assessor v. … See, e.g., Fackler v. Powell, 839 N.E.2d 165, 167 (Ind. 2005); Skendzel v. Marshall, 330 N.E.2d 747, 749 (Ind. 1975); Lake- O’-The Woods Club v. Martinal, 154 N.E.2d 498, 500 (Ind. 1958); Town of St. John v.

Mary K. Fisher v. Carroll County Assessor

74 N.E.3d 582 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 11, 2017

Assessor v. Stout, 996 N.E.2d 871, 873 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2013). … STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v.

Hilbert v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

2016 Ohio 1256 · Ohio Court of Claims · Feb 24, 2016

Brown testified that on numerous occasions he asked plaintiff whether his CDL privileges had been restored and plaintiff replied “no.” (Brown’s deposition, page 28.) … Plaintiff testified that, on the same day, Brown had attempted to persuade him to resign.

Deleuran v. Thompson

2025 NCBC 48 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 22, 2025

Finley v. Brown, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 79, at *8 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2017) (quoting Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc., 2013 NCBC LEXIS 52, at *8 (N.C. Super. Ct. Dec. 5, 2013)). 11. … Todd Brown A. Todd Brown Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases

People v. America

51 Misc. 3d 1003 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 23, 2016

Before Rodriguez , another panel of the First Department upheld denial of a CPL 30.30 claim (People v Brown, 126 AD3d 516, 519 [2015]) because the record supported an inference that the People initially relied on a strategic … In Brown , there was only one post-readiness unreadiness. Brown adopted Judge Graffeo’s rejection of compelling the People to affirmatively justify a subsequent unreadiness.

Ovidiu Ciceu v. Knox County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Oct 24, 2025

This Court’s review of final determinations issued by the Board is limited. Snyder v. Dearborn Cnty. Assessor, 248 N.E.3d 1277, 1281 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2024). … (quoting Basic v. Amouri, 58 N.E.3d 980, 983 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016)).

Pulte Homes of Indiana, LLC v. Hendricks County Assessor

42 N.E.3d 590 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 3, 2015

The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination bears the burden of establishing its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. … The Court does not address this argument because the authority for the Indiana Board’s dismissal was in its own rules, not the Trial Rules. See Muir Woods, Inc. v.

Southern Casualty Co. v. Fulkerson

45 S.W.2d 152 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

In connection with the above, we wish to call attention to the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals at Waco in the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. .Raker et al., 277 S. … Hall Music Co. v. Robertson, 117 Tex. 261 , 1 S.W.(2d) 857 (Com. App. Op. adopted).

Muir Woods, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Assessor of Marion County

36 N.E.3d 1208 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 18, 2015

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Will’s Far-Go Coach Sales v. … Muir Woods contends that its use of the Form 133 appeal procedure was proper according to the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in Lake County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals v.

Pipquarryco, Inc. v. Hamburg Borough

15 N.J. Tax 413 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 19, 1996

After hearing this explanation, the Board granted defendant’s motion. Under N.J.S.A 54:51A-1(c) the Tax Court has the authority to review a county board of taxation dismissal for failure to prosecute. Veeder v. … VSH Realty, Inc. v.

Holland v. Buck Mountain Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc.

2020 NCBC 90 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 15, 2020

.”); Meiselman v. … Burgess v.

Harper, Randall v. USF Holland Trucking Co.

2015 TN WC 154 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 5, 2015

Brown recluse, black widow?? Bite????" However, the page does not identify the author. (Ex. 3.) 2 he could follow-up with his PCP. !d. at 25. Mr. … ~'l>L- Robert V.

Schaefer v. Borough of Chatham

27 N.J. Tax 102 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 3, 2013

County Boards of Taxation (“County Boards”) have, as their paramount objective, a duty to administer justice in each individual appeal. Veeder v. … [Pipquarryco, Inc. v. Borough of Hamburg, 15 N.J.Tax 413, 418 (Tax 1996).] When County Boards were first established in New Jersey in 1906, [1906 N.J.

Yorktown Independent School Dist. v. Afflerbach

12 S.W.2d 130 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929

It is not the actual entry in the minutes of the record of the board’s action that gives validity; such record is but evidence. The important consideration-is the act of the board. See Mecom v. … Cummins v. Gaston (Tex. Civ. App.) 109 S. W. 476 , (writ refused) ; Bums v. Dilly, etc., District (Tex. Com. App.) 295 S. W. 1091 ; Crabb v. Celeste, etc., District, 105 Tex. 194 , 146 S. W. 528 , 39 L. R. A. (N.

Keny v. Ohio State Univ.

2016 Ohio 3475 · Ohio Court of Claims · May 12, 2016

Brown, Jr. (Brown), rather than to Galia’s children. Plaintiffs argue that the disbursement was improper because Galia allegedly filed a beneficiary designation two months prior to her death. … Armstrong v.