Case law

City of Atlantic v. Director, Division of Taxation

24 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 8, 2008

Riorano, Inc. v. … V.

Westerhold, John v. Toms River Twp

New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 21, 2024

McMahon v. City of Newark, 195 N.J. 526, 546 (2008) (citing N.J.S.A. 2B:13-2 and Union City Assocs. v. Union City, 115 N.J. 17, 23 (1989)). … Lawrenceville Garden Apartments v. Township of Lawrence, 14 N.J. Tax 285 (App. Div. 1994). Alid, Inc. v. North Bergen Twp., 180 N.J. Super. 592 (App.

In re the Estate of Brown

131 Misc. 420 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 3, 1926

Brown. He has never accounted. On July 17, 1924, a petition was verified by William A. Evans, as executor of the last will and testament of one Herbert D. Brown, to compel the filing of an account by the executor. … (Matter of Evans v. Brown, 215 App. Div. 675, 676 .)

Bushmann, LLC v. Bartholomew County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Mar 19, 2024

Bushmann, LLC, (“Bushmann”) challenges the Indiana Board of Tax Review’s (“Indiana Board”) final determination upholding Bushmann’s property tax assessments for tax years 2016 and 2017. … Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Chevrolet, the Court rejects both challenges and affirms the Indiana Board’s final determination. See Chevrolet of Columbus, Inc. v. Bartholomew Cnty.

Druesdow v. Baker

229 S.W. 493 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 23, 1921

Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 434 , 14 Sup. Ct. 1114, 38 L. Ed. 1039 ; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Taggart, 163 U. S. 30 , 16 Sup. Ct. 1054, 41 L. Ed. 49 . … Lively v. M. K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas, 102 Tex. 545 , 120 S. W. 852 .

Marion County Assessor v. Gateway Arthur, Inc.

43 N.E.3d 279 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 30, 2015

Accordingly, the Court finds no basis for reversing the Indiana Board’s rejection of the subject property’s 2007 purchase price. See, e.g., French Lick Twp. Tr. Assessor v. … P’ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1138-39 (Ind.

Polk County v. Department of Revenue

14 Or. Tax 566 · Oregon Tax Court · May 6, 1999

Catherine’s Residence, Inc. v. … Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 257 Or 622 , 478 P2d 393 , 480 P2d 713 (1971). One of the problems with Brown’s approach is that he assumes that “old” accommodation fees are out-of-date.

French Lick Township Trustee Assessor v. Kimball International, Inc.

865 N.E.2d 732 · Indiana Tax Court · May 3, 2007

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Endowment Corp. v. Lake County Prop. … The party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board’s final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003).

In Re Larsen

746 A.2d 108 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 2000

The docket entries and verdict slips in Commonwealth v. Larsen, Allegheny County Criminal Docket No. 93-13844 (Board Exhibits 7 and 8); 3. The Superior Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. … Larsen, 452 Pa.Super. 508 , 682 A.2d 783 (1996) (Board Exhibit 3a); 4. The Supreme Court’s Order of March 19, 1997, Commonwealth v.. Larsen, 547 Pa. 752 , 692 A.2d 564 (1997) (Board Exhibit 3b); 5.

Johnson Co. Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals and the Johnson Co. Assessor v. KC Propco LLC d/b/a Kindercare Learning Center

28 N.E.3d 370 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 1, 2015

Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2003). … Dist. v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 930 N.E.2d 1257, 1260 (Ind.

Wabash, Inc. v. Department of State Revenue

729 N.E.2d 620 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 1, 2000

Similarly, in Brown Group Retail, Inc. v. … See Exxon Corp. v.

Shelbyville MHPI, LLC v. Thurston

978 N.E.2d 527 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 5, 2012

A final determination of the Indiana Board is contrary to law if it violates any statute, constitutional provision, legal principle, or rule of substantive or procedural law. See John Malone Enter., Inc. v. … Apts: v. Conner, 854 N.E.2d 950, 958 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005) (citation omitted).

Garrett LLC v. Noble County Assessor

112 N.E.3d 1168 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 24, 2018

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … The Court has repeatedly reminded parties that they must walk the Indiana Board, and this Court, through every element of their analyses. See, e.g., Clark v.

Cuvillier v. State

132 Misc. 182 · New York Court of Claims · May 24, 1928

Brown v. Bd. of Supers. Onondaga Co., 4 N. Y. Cr. 102; affirmed, 102 N. … Co. v. Canal Board, 204 id. 471). These cases show what is meant by a moral obligation, and in each case some direct benefit was- received by the State.

Harlingen Independent School Dist. v. Page

48 S.W.2d 983 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 21, 1932

in Board of Trustees of Alpine Independent School District v. … In Board of Trustees of Alpine Independent School District v.

People v. Jaoui

52 Misc. 3d 769 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · May 16, 2016

cases that follow Sibblies: People v Rodriguez ( 135 AD3d 587 [1st Dept 2016]) and People v Brown ( 126 AD3d 516 [1st Dept 2015], lv granted 25 NY3d 1160 [2015]). … By contrast, in Brown , there was nothing in the record to cast doubt upon the truthfulness and accuracy of the People’s COR (see People v Brown, 126 AD3d 516, 518-519 [2015]).

Deer Creek Developers, Ltd. v. Department of Local Government Finance

769 N.E.2d 259 · Indiana Tax Court · May 30, 2002

Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the State Board's final determination of Issue V. VI. … final determination of Issues I-V.

Mayfair Holding Corp. v. Township of North Bergen

4 N.J. Tax 38 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 4, 1982

Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488 , 70 A.2d 733 (1950); Suburban Department Stores v. East Orange, 47 N.J.Super. 472 , 136 A.2d 280 (App.Div.1957); Danis v. Middlesex Cty. … The circumstances of this case do not warrant application of estoppel against the county board. An individual is chargeable with knowledge of the law, Gilbralter Factors Corp. v.

Duke Power Co. v. Hillsborough Township

20 N.J. Misc. 240 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 2, 1942

This board had occasion to consider the question in the case of Feindt v. … MacPherson v. State Board, supra.

Lanier v. Eddie Romanelle's

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 22, 2007

Adam Brown, a neurosurgeon. Dr. Brown reviewed plaintiff's MRI and found what appeared to be bilateral radiculopathies or compression of nerves at both C4-C5 and C5-C6 for which he recommended surgery. … See, Holley v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 , 581 S.E.2d 750 (2003); Young v. Hickory Business Furniture , 353 N.C. 227 , 538 S.E.3d 912 (2000). 2.