Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.47s
Wabash, Inc. v. Department of State Revenue
729 N.E.2d 620 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 1, 2000
Similarly, in Brown Group Retail, Inc. v. … See Exxon Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished91 Misc. 2d 211 · New York Family Court · Aug 5, 1977
(Matter of Larney v Brown, 70 Misc 2d 546 ; Brown v Brown, 71 Misc 2d 11 .) However, a distinction should be made between the parties’ rights under the separation agreement and their rights under a divorce decree. … (Goldman v Goldman, 282 NY 296 ; McMains v McMains, 15 NY2d 283 .) When this distinction is kept in mind, Leffler v Leffler ( 50 AD2d 93 , affd on opn below 40 NY2d 1036 ) is more readily understood.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMeridian Towers East & West v. Washington Township Assessor
805 N.E.2d 475 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 25, 2004
ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Ein-dowment Corp. v. … See Heart City Chrysler v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 714 N.E.2d 329, 333 (Ind.
Cited 18 timesPublishedKennedy v. International-Great Northern R. Co.
1 S.W.2d 581 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 11, 1928
Other cases cited against the ruling of the Court of Civil Appeals here are Boon v. Weathered, 23 Tex. 675 ; Ayres v. Duprey, 27 Tex. 594 , 86 Am. Dec. 657 ; Johnson v. Brown, 51 Tex. 65 ; Kennedy v. … On that point Boon v. Weathered, supra, Weir v. McGee, 25 Tex. Supp. 20 , and Johnson v. Brown, supra, were cited. The opinion was by the Commission of Appeals, but was “adopted.” In Weir v.
Cited 23 timesPublished46 N.E.3d 1 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 30, 2015
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … P’ship v. Smith, 926 N.E.2d 1134, 1137 (Ind.
Cited 13 timesPublished170 Misc. 579 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 18, 1939
The first consists of Lilia Brown Hinds, Anna Marie Wheeler and Arthur A. … Brown, who assert their status by reason of the alleged fact that their mother, Lilia Brown, was an adopted daughter of the present decedent’s father, Virgil Whitcomb.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 16, 2007
Brown was never made aware of the incident at work. … *Page 7 Stat. § 97-2 (6); Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 (1980); Holley v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 (2003). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 3, 1999
Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 477 S.E.2d 197 (1996). … Id. ; Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 477 S.E.2d 197 (1996).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHouston v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 14, 2006
Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. … Camalier v. Jeffries, 340 N.C. 699 , 706 , 460 S.E.2d 133 , 136 (1995). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalker v. Conway Southern Express
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 28, 1997
Brown was received into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit Two. 4. … Brown v. S N Communications , 124 N.C. App. 320 (1996), 477 S.E.2d 197 . Heatherly v. Montgomery Components, Inc. , 71 N.C. App. 377 , 323 S.E.2d 29 (1984). Watson v. Winston-Salem Transit Authority , 92 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 2004
Lawrence v. Schellstede, 348 P.2d 1078 , 1082 (Okla. 1960); see also State ex rel. Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997) (quoting Lawrence, at 1082). … . ¶ 14 In Way v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKbt Realty Servs., Inc. v. Appycity, LLC
2021 NCBC 47 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 9, 2021
DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. … See Brown v. Cavit Scis., Inc., 230 N.C. App. 460, 467 (2013) (“A complaint which fails to state a cause of action is not sufficient to support a default judgment for plaintiff.” (citation omitted)). 37.
Cited 1 timesPublished131 Misc. 420 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 3, 1926
Brown. He has never accounted. On July 17, 1924, a petition was verified by William A. Evans, as executor of the last will and testament of one Herbert D. Brown, to compel the filing of an account by the executor. … (Matter of Evans v. Brown, 215 App. Div. 675, 676 .)
Cited 7 timesPublished13 S.W.2d 685 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1929
Co. v. Winter, 44 Tex. 597 . The location and outlines of such 200 acres are in some degree more definitely shown by other evidence now to be noticed. … Brown.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAlice Luebke v. Indiana Department of Local Government Finance
Indiana Tax Court · Jul 5, 2024
State v. Sproles, 672 N.E.2d 1353, 1357 (Ind. 1996). … Indiana Dep’t of Env’t Mgmt. v. West, 838 N.E.2d 408, 415 (Ind. 2005) (quoting Andrianova v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin., 799 N.E.2d 5, 7 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPolk County v. Department of Revenue
14 Or. Tax 566 · Oregon Tax Court · May 6, 1999
Catherine’s Residence, Inc. v. … Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 257 Or 622 , 478 P2d 393 , 480 P2d 713 (1971). One of the problems with Brown’s approach is that he assumes that “old” accommodation fees are out-of-date.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCity of Atlantic v. Director, Division of Taxation
24 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 8, 2008
Riorano, Inc. v. … V.
Cited 7 timesPublishedGarrett LLC v. Noble County Assessor
112 N.E.3d 1168 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 24, 2018
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … The Court has repeatedly reminded parties that they must walk the Indiana Board, and this Court, through every element of their analyses. See, e.g., Clark v.
Cited 5 timesPublished223 S.W. 171 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 6, 1920
Another Iowa case (Bankhead v. Brown, 25 Iowa, 540 ) cited in the Welton Case, from the opinion in which by Chief Justice Dillon the court in the Welton Case quotes at length, also involved a private road. … Rep. 766 , the manifest purpose of opening the street was to benefit the property of certain members of the board of aldermen or house of delegates, and the Supreme Court of Missouri in effect, if not indeed in express terms
Cited 33 timesPublishedWesterhold, John v. Toms River Twp
New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 21, 2024
McMahon v. City of Newark, 195 N.J. 526, 546 (2008) (citing N.J.S.A. 2B:13-2 and Union City Assocs. v. Union City, 115 N.J. 17, 23 (1989)). … Lawrenceville Garden Apartments v. Township of Lawrence, 14 N.J. Tax 285 (App. Div. 1994). Alid, Inc. v. North Bergen Twp., 180 N.J. Super. 592 (App.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna