Case law

Commercial Credit Co. v. Brown

284 S.W. 911 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 23, 1926

W. 897 , from the Ninth District, but is admittedly in conflict with the cases of Holt v. Schwarz, 225 S. W. 856 , from the Fourth District, Dallas, etc., Bank v. Crismon, 231 S. … Wilson v. Donaldson, 121 Cal. 8 , 53 P. 405 , 43 L. R. A. 524, 66 Am. St. Rep. 17 , cited in American Type Founders Co. v. Nichols, supra.

Hicks v. Brown

151 S.W.2d 790 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1941

Defendant in error, Edna Brown, sustained personal injuries in a collision at a street intersection in Amarillo between two taxicabs. … Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Woodall, Tex.Com.App., 299 S.W. 220 ; Montrief & Montrief v. Bragg, Tex.Com.App., 2 S.W.2d 276 ; Horton & Horton v. House, Tex.Com.App., 29 S.W.2d 984 ; Dixie Motor Coach Corp. v.

Brown v. Robison

17 S.W.2d 766 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 5, 1929

The question arising on said motion is essentially the same as that involved in the motion to dismiss the case of Guenther v. Robison (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 765 , this day decided.

Knox v. Brown

277 S.W. 619 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 10, 1925

In Hodges v. … The case of Keen v.

Brown v. Tultex Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 2000

Ballenger v. Burris Industries, 66 N.C. App. 556 , 311 S.E.2d 881 (1984). *********** Based upon the foregoing stipulations, findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Full Commission enters the following: ORDER 1.

Brown v. Tultex Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 2000

Ballenger v. Burris Industries, 66 N.C. App. 556 , 311 S.E.2d 881 (1984). *********** Based upon the foregoing stipulations, findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Full Commission enters the following: ORDER 1.

Brown v. Mitchell

1 Posey 373 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 25, 1881

Robinson v. Schmidt, 48 Tex., 19 ; Acklin v. Paschal, 48 Tex., 177 . We hold: 1. That intervenor’s plea was sufficient to maintain his • action against Brown. 2. … That there is not sufficient error in the finding of the jury, as between Brown and Preston, to require a reversal. 3.

Brown v. Meador

1 Posey 281 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 24, 1880

Brown. … Rules of Supreme Court, rule 24; Steen v. The State, 27 Tex., 88 ; Pendarvis v. Gray, 41 Tex., 330 ; Carter v. Eames, 44 Tex., 548 .

Griffin v. Brown

1 White & W. 618 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 14, 1881

[Lindsey v. Luckett, 20 Tex. 516 .] But evidence aliunde the record cannot be considered by an appellate court in *619 determining the question of the jurisdiction of the court a quo. [Chrisman v. Graham, 51 Tex. 454 .] … [Horan v. Wahrenberger, 9 Tex. 313 ; Neil v. State, 43 Tex. 91 ; Fitzhugh v. Custer, 4 Tex. 391 .]

Kelly v. Brown

529 A.2d 271 · Delaware Family Court · May 7, 1987

As held in Schlagenhauf v. … While a Court is justified in exercising considerable restraint in disposing of the requests, See Stone v. Stone, Utah Supr., 19 Utah 2d 378 , 431 P.2d 802 (1967); Neuman v.

Brown v. Texfi Industries

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 13, 1998

. § 97-2 (6); Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 (1980); Lockwood v. McCaskill , 262 N.C. 663 (1964). 2.

Oliver v. Brown & Morrison, Ltd.

2022 NCBC 13 · North Carolina Business Court · Mar 3, 2022

Oliver v. Brown & Morrison, Ltd., 2022 NCBC 13. … OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON BROWN & MORRISON, LTD., a BROWN & MORRISON, LTD.’S AND North Carolina Business TIMOTHY J.

Oliver v. Brown & Morrison, Ltd.

2022 NCBC 16 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 7, 2022

Oliver v. Brown & Morrison, Ltd., 2022 NCBC 16. … OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. BROWN & MORRISON, LTD., a North Carolina Business Corporation, and ORDER AND OPINION ON TIMOTHY J.

Brown v. Inco, Incorporated

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 30, 1994

Tickle v. Insulating Company , 8 N.C. App. 5 , 173 S.E.2d 491 (1970); Gillikin v. Burrage , 263 N.C. 317 , 325 , 139 S.E.2d 753 (1965); Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc ., 300 N.C. 164 , 169 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980). … N.C.G.S. § 97-29 ; Wyatt v. Sharp , 239 N.C. 655 , 80 S.E.2d 762 (1954). * * * * * * * * * * * Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Full Commission enters the following AWARD 1.

Sparks v. Brown

2 Wash. Terr. 426 · Washington Territory · Jul 15, 1885

(Hosmer v. Wallace, 47 Cal. 461 ; Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet. 469 ; Shipley v. Cowan, 91 U. S. 330 ; Moore v. Robbins, 96 U. S. 531 ; Quimby v. Conlan, 104 U. S. 420 ; Steel v. Smelting Co., 106 U. S. 450 .) … Langford’s fraud, if any, was in 1863; Hulstein’s, in 1865; that of Brown and husband of the same dates ; and no *433 ■fraud has been well laid as against Hidden.

Bellingham Massachusetts Self Storage, LLC v. Town of Bellingham

Massachusetts Land Court · Jul 15, 2021

Corp. v. Board of Selectmen, 368 Mass. 385 , 394 (1975), quoting Leahy v. … v.

Brown v. Department of Transportation

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 24, 2010

Brown v. Sara Lee Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 2010

Brown v. Ross Correctional Inst.

2009 Ohio 7183 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 22, 2009

[Cite as Brown v. Ross Correctional Inst., 2009-Ohio-7183.] … Borchert v.

Meadows, Hunter v. Brown Bros., Inc.

2026 TN WC 54 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 4, 2026

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). First, Brown accepted Mr. … Requests to order Brown to authorize all future treatment require an advisory opinion, which the Court must not do. Charter Lakeside Behavioral Health Sys. v. Tenn. Health Facilities Comm’n, 2001 Tenn. App.