Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.56s
138 Misc. 42 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 30, 1930
Petry v. Langan, 227 N. Y. 621 ), thus in effect emphatically reaffirming the doctrine of Soper v. Brown . … Jarman and subsequently confirmed in Soper v. Brown .
Cited 16 timesPublished139 Misc. 2d 737 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 10, 1988
Assocs. v Goldman, 137 Misc 2d 1024, 1029-1030 ; Metz v Woodward-Brown Realty Co., 182 App Div 60, 65 ). … (Arbegast v Board of Educ., 65 NY2d 161 , 169.) The court finds that CPLR 3015 (e) does not require the abrogation of established law. Also, without doubt, CPLR 3015 (e) did not repeal by implication the licensing law.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMorrison v. New Hanover Cty. Schools
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 18, 2004
Defendant is a duly self-insured and the North Carolina School Board Association is the servicing agent. 4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $322.94. 5.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSimmons v. Columbus Cty. B.O.E.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 23, 2004
such board was the governing body. … Davidson v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , 142 N.C. 544 , 543 S.E.2d 920 (2001). In the present case, Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublished134 Misc. 730 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 11, 1929
Thus, in Brown v. … Indeed, this is substantially stated by the Court of Appeals in Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublished124 Misc. 2d 587 · New York Family Court · Apr 19, 1984
Brown (supra) and its progeny. … and have elected to follow this aspect of the Brown case.
Cited 1 timesPublished2010 Ohio 5905 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 8, 2010
Plaintiffs’ first expert, Glenn Tung, M.D., a professor of diagnostic imaging at Brown University, testified that he is board-certified in internal medicine, radiology, and neuroradiology. Dr. … Nickell v. Gonzalez (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 136, 139.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRogue Gem & Geology Club, Inc. v. Josephine County Assessor
17 Or. Tax 446 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 10, 2003
Sue Brown, past-president of Plaintiff, appeared for Plaintiff. Michael Schneyder, Assessor, appeared for Defendant Department of Revenue (the department). … Methodist Homes, Inc. v. Tax Com., 226 Or 298, 308-09 , 360 P2d 293 (1961) (citing Behnke-Walker v. Multnomah County, 173 Or 510, 519 , 146 P2d 614 (1944)).
Cited 4 timesPublished149 Misc. 2d 519 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1991
stipulation in counterparts which consents to the awarding of the sum $13,421.50 to Harris, Beach & Wilcox as legal fees and disbursements on behalf of the attorneys for the various beneficiaries of the estates of Harold Brown … Fund v Grandeau, 72 NY2d 62 ; see also, Judiciary Law § 468-b; 22 NYCRR 7200.1). In addition, the Fund is a special fund of the State with its assets in the custody of the State Comptroller.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGabriel Ades v. Borough of Deal
New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 24, 2025
Then the conclusions of value would be considered by the [county] Board”); 1125-1127 Clinton Ave. Assoc. v. Irvington Twp., 2 N.J. … See Hasbrouck Heights v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarger v. Manpower of Hickory Temp. Svcs.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 22, 1997
Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers , 300 N.C. 164 ,167-68, 265 S.E.2d 389 , 392 (1980). … Ballenger v. Burris Indus. , 66 N.C. App. 556 , 567 , 311 S.E.2d 881 , 888 , rev. denied , 310 N.C. 743 , 315 S.E.2d 700 (1984).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOsolo Township v. Elkhart Maple Lane Associates L.P.
789 N.E.2d 109 · Indiana Tax Court · May 30, 2003
Furthermore, the party seeking to overturn the Indiana Board's final determination bears the burden of proving its invalidity. See Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998). … Consequently, the Assessor was required to present probative evidence showing why the Indiana Board's classification was improper. See Deer Creek Developers, Ltd. v.
Cited 94 timesPublished23 S.W.2d 300 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 22, 1930
City of Dayton v. Board of Education, 181 Ky. 574 , 205 S. W. 678 ; Dunn v. City of Cadiz, 140 Ky. 217 , 130 S. W. 1089 ; Roberts v. Improvement District, 156 Ark. 248 , 245 S. W. 489 ; Mayhew v. … Sharum v. City of Muskogee, 43 Okl. 22 , 141 P. 22 ; Temple Electric Co. v. Halliburton (Tex. Civ. App.) 136 S. W. 584 ; Fort Worth, etc., Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 943 .
Cited 14 timesPublished57 Misc. 2d 731 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1968
Thus, he assumed control and direction of the situation and responsibility for what happened (Verduce v. Board of Higher Educ., 8 N Y 2d 928; Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., 301 N. Y. 182 ; Lesniak v. … The court, accordingly, finds that the professor’s negligence is imputable to his employer under the doctrine of respondeat superior (Burmaster v. State of New York, 7 N Y 2d 65; Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublished135 Misc. 2d 73 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 25, 1987
The People place their reliance on People v Gaggi ( 104 AD2d 422 , appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 636 ), People v Brown ( 113 AD2d 812 ) and People v Gadsden (NYLJ, Jan. 21, 1982, at 13, col 3). … The court has examined People v Gaggi (supra), People v Brown (supra) and People v Gadsden (supra) (including the record on appeal for People v Gaggi and People v Brown) and finds that these cases are distinguishable from
Cited 2 timesPublishedBuff v. N.C. Law Enforcement Offices
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 27, 2005
Prior to the arrival of any sheriff's deputies, Officer Cane moved decedent's gun from where he found it to between his vehicle and Chief Brown's vehicle, laid it on the ground and then after Chief Brown left, he put it in … Garrett, a board certified pathologist, is employed by Coastal Pathology Associates and is the medical examiner for Onslow and Jones Counties, North Carolina.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the United States Trust Co.
12 Mills Surr. 367 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1914
Brown and Marie E. … Brown and Marie E. Murphy. Of course if this contention of the objectant is sound and the trust term is one for the lives of three annuitants, the limitation is void in its entirety (Brown v. Quintard, 177 N.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDavis, Betty J. v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd.
2017 TN WC 81 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2017
Brown. The Court takes judicial notice of the testimony heard and exhibits admitted into evidence at the January 23, 2017 expedited hearing. See Hughes v. New Life Dev. … Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublished166 Misc. 664 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 14, 1938
(Schermerhorn v. Talman, 14 N. Y. 93, 126 ; Brown v. Robinson, 224 id. 301, 314.) … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N. Y. 484, 495 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedLusk v. Hickory Public Schools
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 8, 2000
The defendant is self-insured with North Carolina School Board Insurance Trust as the Administrator. 4. The plaintiffs average weekly wage is $157.50 per week. 5. … His position required him to operate saws and lift boards of lumber ranging from 15 to 60 pounds.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna