Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.24s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 2008
Laws ch. 2 , § 9; see also part V, below. 3 The term "trade name" has not been defined by the Board of Dentistry in its Administrative Rules. See OAC 195:1-1-1 — 35-1-5. … The Board should consider the promulgation of such rules to provide guidance to the Board and practitioners as to what factors the Board would take into account in determining whether a sign is an advertisement and, if so
Cited 0 timesPublishedFIRST UNION CORP. v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., 2001 NCBC 09 (Amended 08/10/01)
North Carolina Business Court · Aug 10, 2001
BALLOUN, PETER C. ) 01-CVS-8036 BROWNING, W. HAYNE HIPP, ) LLOYD U. … {50} Eight years after Smith v. Van Gorkom, in Cede & Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBethune, Brandon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
2016 TN WC 236 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 10, 2016
Parrish himself once worked as an on-road supervisor and as a loader of UPS' "brown package cars." (Ex. 4 at 6-8.) … See, e.g., Tindall v. Waring Park, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987). Moreover, the Court notes Tennessee authority to the effect that an inaccurate history does not support a finding of causation. In Hamilton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMillers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Patten
250 S.W. 154 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 25, 1923
However, the case of Murray Ginning System Co. v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 61 S. W. 508 , is almost a parallel case. … It is perfectly clear that Patten was not to share as a principal in the profits of the business, as a present owner of an interest therein (Fink v. Brown [Tex. Com. App.] 215 S.
Cited 15 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1968
Brown v. State Election Board, Okl. 369 P.2d 140 . … See Nixon v. Roberts, Okl., 420 P.2d 903 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrasher v. Sam Dell's Dodge Corp.
32 N.Y.3d 1012 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Sep 18, 2018
Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished247 S.W. 276 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 24, 1923
Discussing the law as applied to the facts of the case of Browne v. … The necessity for future action on Browne’s part as the condition for the vesture of any interest in his favor made the contract purely executory. Hazlett v. Harwood, 80 Tex. 508 , 16 S. W. 310 ; Tayler v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAlpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell
59 S.W.2d 364 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1933
In Galpin v. … In Morse v.
Abrogated on other grounds by Dubai Petroleum Co. v. Kazi, 43 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 412 (2000)Cited 101 timesPublished199 Misc. 777 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 17, 1950
Rep. 458; Rowley v. Durfey, 230 App. Div. 402 ; Charles v. Scheibel, 128 Misc. 275 , affd. 221 App. Div. 816 ; Champion v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 398 ; Conners v. Winans, 122 Misc. 824 ; 27 R. C. … Browne, 119 Misc. 513 ), and an action in ejectment will lie to recover actual possession of the premises (Powers v. Ingraham, 3 Barb. 576 ; Burkhart v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedIslet Scis., Inc. v. Brighthaven Ventures, LLC
2017 NCBC 17 · North Carolina Business Court · Mar 6, 2017
Brown v. Refuel Am., Inc., 186 N.C. App. 631, 634, 652 S.E.2d 389, 392 (2007). 25. … Brown, 186 N.C. App. at 638, 652 S.E.2d at 394 (quoting Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 790 (1984)). 27.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Browning
10 Mills Surr. 380 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1913
The will bequeaths a life estate to two aunts of decedent, Sarah and Anna Browning, if they survive the testatrix, with a remainder to “ such of my beloved sisters, Barbara Browning and Jane Anna Pitt Browning (Jane Gross … The rule laid down in Delafield v. Parish, 25 N. Y. 29 , has been quoted many times with approval by the courts of this state and is reiterated in Matter of Lawrence, 48 App.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCVS Corporation (6698-02) v. Monroe County Assessor
83 N.E.3d 1281 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 29, 2017
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Accordingly, the Indiana Board’s final determination is supported by substantial evidence, and the Court cannot and will not reweigh the evidence on appeal. See Kildsig v. Warrick Cnty.
Cited 4 timesPublished2011 Ohio 5297 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 27, 2011
V. … See In re Brown, V93-68964sc (7-24-94) affirmed tc (12-27-94); In re Carreon, V93-58560sc (7-29-94). {¶19}Reimbursement of college tuition has been granted if the applicant received free psychological counseling
Cited 0 timesPublished2019 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 16, 2019
Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 536, 645 S.E.2d 117, 122–23 (2007); see Technetics Grp. … WW primarily relies upon the Court of Appeals’ decision in Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 645 S.E.2d 117 (2007), to support its position.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn re the Estate of Sonderling
155 Misc. 403 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 25, 1935
effective March 7,1933, when it was authorized to suspend any provision of the Banking Law in whole or in part (Moses v. … Y. 562 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611 .)
Cited 6 timesPublished141 Misc. 2d 572 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 20, 1988
In the circumstances, an issue is presented whether George Brown has forfeited his right to succeed to any property interest by reason of his wife’s death (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506 ; Matter of Wells, 76 Misc 2d 458 ; cf … This narrow statutory construction is not without judicial support (Higbee v Schwartz, 185 Misc 28 ; In re Gore’s Will, 51 NYS2d 612 ).
Cited 3 timesPublishedRuggieri, June v. Amazon.com, LLC,
2023 TN WC 16 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 16, 2023
Orman, at 677; see also Smith v. TrustPoint Hosp., LLC, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Appeals Board recently issued an instructive opinion on this question. In Mitchell v. AECOM d/b/a Shimmick Construction, Inc., 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMonroe County Assessor v. Kooshtard Property I, LLC
38 N.E.3d 754 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 2, 2015
See Dawkins v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 659 N.E.2d 706, 709 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1995). … See Amax Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 552 N.E.2d 850, 852 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1990).
Cited 6 timesPublishedInland Am. Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston
2010 NCBC 19 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 24, 2010
Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston, 2010 NCBC 19. … (Dep. of John Brown (“Brown Dep.”) 618:14−621:11.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedGregory v. Primary Health Concepts
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 6, 2006
Browne. 9. … Roth's training and board certification required study and understanding of toxicology. 28. Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna