Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.24s

  • Opinion No. (2008)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 2008

    Laws ch. 2 , § 9; see also part V, below. 3 The term "trade name" has not been defined by the Board of Dentistry in its Administrative Rules. See OAC 195:1-1-1 — 35-1-5. … The Board should consider the promulgation of such rules to provide guidance to the Board and practitioners as to what factors the Board would take into account in determining whether a sign is an advertisement and, if so

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • FIRST UNION CORP. v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., 2001 NCBC 09 (Amended 08/10/01)

    North Carolina Business Court · Aug 10, 2001

    BALLOUN, PETER C. ) 01-CVS-8036 BROWNING, W. HAYNE HIPP, ) LLOYD U. … {50} Eight years after Smith v. Van Gorkom, in Cede & Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bethune, Brandon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    2016 TN WC 236 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 10, 2016

    Parrish himself once worked as an on-road supervisor and as a loader of UPS' "brown package cars." (Ex. 4 at 6-8.) … See, e.g., Tindall v. Waring Park, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987). Moreover, the Court notes Tennessee authority to the effect that an inaccurate history does not support a finding of causation. In Hamilton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Patten

    250 S.W. 154 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 25, 1923

    However, the case of Murray Ginning System Co. v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 61 S. W. 508 , is almost a parallel case. … It is perfectly clear that Patten was not to share as a principal in the profits of the business, as a present owner of an interest therein (Fink v. Brown [Tex. Com. App.] 215 S.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-311 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1968

    Brown v. State Election Board, Okl. 369 P.2d 140 . … See Nixon v. Roberts, Okl., 420 P.2d 903 (1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brasher v. Sam Dell's Dodge Corp.

    32 N.Y.3d 1012 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Sep 18, 2018

    Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Bryan

    247 S.W. 276 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 24, 1923

    Discussing the law as applied to the facts of the case of Browne v. … The necessity for future action on Browne’s part as the condition for the vesture of any interest in his favor made the contract purely executory. Hazlett v. Harwood, 80 Tex. 508 , 16 S. W. 310 ; Tayler v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell

    59 S.W.2d 364 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1933

    In Galpin v. … In Morse v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Dubai Petroleum Co. v. Kazi, 43 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 412 (2000)Cited 101 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of De Stuers

    199 Misc. 777 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 17, 1950

    Rep. 458; Rowley v. Durfey, 230 App. Div. 402 ; Charles v. Scheibel, 128 Misc. 275 , affd. 221 App. Div. 816 ; Champion v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 398 ; Conners v. Winans, 122 Misc. 824 ; 27 R. C. … Browne, 119 Misc. 513 ), and an action in ejectment will lie to recover actual possession of the premises (Powers v. Ingraham, 3 Barb. 576 ; Burkhart v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Islet Scis., Inc. v. Brighthaven Ventures, LLC

    2017 NCBC 17 · North Carolina Business Court · Mar 6, 2017

    Brown v. Refuel Am., Inc., 186 N.C. App. 631, 634, 652 S.E.2d 389, 392 (2007). 25. … Brown, 186 N.C. App. at 638, 652 S.E.2d at 394 (quoting Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 790 (1984)). 27.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Browning

    10 Mills Surr. 380 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1913

    The will bequeaths a life estate to two aunts of decedent, Sarah and Anna Browning, if they survive the testatrix, with a remainder to “ such of my beloved sisters, Barbara Browning and Jane Anna Pitt Browning (Jane Gross … The rule laid down in Delafield v. Parish, 25 N. Y. 29 , has been quoted many times with approval by the courts of this state and is reiterated in Matter of Lawrence, 48 App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • CVS Corporation (6698-02) v. Monroe County Assessor

    83 N.E.3d 1281 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 29, 2017

    STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Accordingly, the Indiana Board’s final determination is supported by substantial evidence, and the Court cannot and will not reweigh the evidence on appeal. See Kildsig v. Warrick Cnty.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Langwasser

    2011 Ohio 5297 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 27, 2011

    V. … See In re Brown, V93-68964sc (7-24-94) affirmed tc (12-27-94); In re Carreon, V93-58560sc (7-29-94). {¶19}Reimbursement of college tuition has been granted if the applicant received free psychological counseling

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Window World of Baton Rouge, LLC v. Window World, Inc.; Window World of St. Louis, Inc. v. Window World, Inc.

    2019 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 16, 2019

    Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 536, 645 S.E.2d 117, 122–23 (2007); see Technetics Grp. … WW primarily relies upon the Court of Appeals’ decision in Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. App. 529, 645 S.E.2d 117 (2007), to support its position.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Sonderling

    155 Misc. 403 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 25, 1935

    effective March 7,1933, when it was authorized to suspend any provision of the Banking Law in whole or in part (Moses v. … Y. 562 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Brown

    141 Misc. 2d 572 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 20, 1988

    In the circumstances, an issue is presented whether George Brown has forfeited his right to succeed to any property interest by reason of his wife’s death (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506 ; Matter of Wells, 76 Misc 2d 458 ; cf … This narrow statutory construction is not without judicial support (Higbee v Schwartz, 185 Misc 28 ; In re Gore’s Will, 51 NYS2d 612 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ruggieri, June v. Amazon.com, LLC,

    2023 TN WC 16 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 16, 2023

    Orman, at 677; see also Smith v. TrustPoint Hosp., LLC, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Appeals Board recently issued an instructive opinion on this question. In Mitchell v. AECOM d/b/a Shimmick Construction, Inc., 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Monroe County Assessor v. Kooshtard Property I, LLC

    38 N.E.3d 754 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 2, 2015

    See Dawkins v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 659 N.E.2d 706, 709 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1995). … See Amax Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 552 N.E.2d 850, 852 (Ind. Tax Ct. 1990).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Inland Am. Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston

    2010 NCBC 19 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 24, 2010

    Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston, 2010 NCBC 19. … (Dep. of John Brown (“Brown Dep.”) 618:14−621:11.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gregory v. Primary Health Concepts

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 6, 2006

    Browne. 9. … Roth's training and board certification required study and understanding of toxicology. 28. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.