Case law

Prosnitz v. Augustus

175 Misc. 2d 582 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 8, 1998

In Board of Mgrs. v Anderson (NYLJ, Aug. 25, 1993, at 25, col 5), the condominium Board of Managers brought a summary proceeding to evict the respondent unit owner based on the failure of the respondent to pay past due common … (See, Susskind v 1136 Tenants Corp., 43 Misc 2d 588 ; First N. Y. Bank for Bus. v 155 E. 34 Realty Co., 158 Misc 2d 658 .)

Cooley v. Miller

228 S.W. 1085 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 16, 1921

W. 78 (writ of error refused); Brown v. Humphrey, 43 Tex. Civ. App. 23 , 95 S. W. 23 ; Breath v. Flowers, 43 Tex. Civ. App. 516 , 95 S. W. 26 ; Mitchell v. Robinson (Civ. App.) 162 S. … W. 443 (writ of error refused); Nunez v. McElroy (Civ. App.) 174 S. W. 829 ; Davis v. Cox (Civ. App.) 176 S. W. 931 ; Brown v. Foster (Civ. App.) 178 S.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1989

The Court in a more recent opinion in Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. … The Healy predecessor, Brown-Forman and its holding. ¶ 11 In Brown-Forman Distiller Corp. v.

Parker v. Holstead

255 S.W. 724 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 21, 1923

He cites Weller v. Gay, 24 Wend. 485 ; People v. Warren, 5 Hill 440 ; Wilmarth v. Burt, 7 Metc. 257 ; Twitchell v. Shaw, 10 Cush. 46 ; Watson v. Watson, 9 Conn. 140, 146 (citing Belk v. Broadbent, 3 T. … R. 183-185; Gruman v. Raymond, 1 Conn. 40 ; Miller v. Davis, Comyn, 590); Cunningham v. Mitchell, 67 Pa. St. 78; Brainard v. Head, 15 La. App. 489 ; Wall v. Trumbull, 16 Mich. 228 ; Bird v.

In re the Estate of Brown

155 Misc. 620 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 17, 1935

Powell, and my beloved grandson, Samuel Brown, son of my deceased son, Samuel H. … Brown, share and share alike and to their heirs and assigns forever, subject however as to the share of said Samuel Brown my said grandson to the following provision, trust and condition to wit:” This paragraph of the will

Guthrie v. North Carolina Department of Education

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 20, 1996

Humphries v. N.C.D.O.C.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 28, 1995

G.S. § 143-291 et seq .; Cf., Brown v. Wesleyan College , 65 N.C. App. 579 , 309 S.E.2d 701 (1983). 3. Mr. Tyrone Humphries was not contributorily negligent for the injuries which he sustained on or about 8 April 1990. … G.S. § 143-291 et seq .; Cf., Brown v. Wesleyan College , 65 N.C.

People v. Smith

82 Misc. 2d 204 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · May 16, 1975

In People v Brown, NYLJ, Dec 15, 1970, p 19, col 2) the special officer was an employee of the New York City Department of Hospitals, employed to maintain security at Harlem Hospital. He was not a peace officer. … The government may not appoint agents to perform governmental functions, as here, and at the same time claim that they are immune from constitutional restrictions placed upon governmental authority” (People v Brown, supra

Hensley v. Ashland, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 3, 2005

See Smith v. Champion , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999); Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works , 84 N.C. App. 188 , 352 S.E.2d 690 (1987). 4. … Smith v. Champion , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999); Wilder v. Barbour Boat Works , 84 N.C. App. 188 , 352 S.E.2d 690 (1987). 7.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Chris Kannady, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 91

2024 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 2024

Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶ 10 , 85 P.3d 841, 845 . "The words of a statute will be given their plain and ordinary meaning unless it is contrary to the purpose and intent of the statute when considered as a whole." … Higgins Discussed 2002 OK 47 , 49 P.3d 719 , GRIMES v. OKLAHOMA CITY Discussed 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 , FANNING v. BROWN Discussed 2009 OK 20 , 206 P.3d 599 , WELCH v.

Leftwich v. United Federation of Dairy Herd

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 4, 2003

pounds; (iv) limited standing of one hour maximum without breaks; (v) limited sitting of one hour without breaks; and (vi) no driving of an automobile. 7. … Kanipe v. Lane Upholstery, Hickory Tavern Furniture Co. , 151 N.C. App. 478 , 566 S.E.2d 167 (2002). 2.

Speedway Public Library v. Indiana Department of Local Government Finance

12 N.E.3d 996 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 24, 2014

See Brown v. Dep’t Local Gov’t Fin., 989 N.E.2d 386, 388 (Ind.Tax Ct.2013). … See Town of Beverly Shores Plan Comm’n v.

Gurley v. Pilgrim Oil Co.

285 S.W. 283 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 16, 1926

In this very connection, we quote as follows from Chief Justice Willie in the case of Davie v. … A somewhat similar case is that of Railway Co. v. Crump, 102 Tex. 253 , 115 S. W. 26 .

Woods, Jon v. Traeger Pellet Grills, Inc.

2019 TN WC 145 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 10, 2019

Allen Brown, xX allen @ jallenbrownpllc.com Employee’s Attorney Gerard Jabaley, xX gjabaley @ wimberlylawson.com Employer’s Attorney / “Gury WU in Penny Shrujy, Clerk of Court Court of Werkers’ Compensation … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Caswell

1 S.W.2d 597 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 18, 1928

league, to wit: 96 acres of land of the David Brown league on the bank of the Neches river, beginning at the N. … Laidacker v. Palmer (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 739 , affirmed (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 362 . Moreover, express adjudication controls mere recitals.

In re Eakin

150 A.3d 1042 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2016

V, § 18(b)-(d). … V, § 18(b)(5).

Kearney v. Vance Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 24, 2004

Pope v. Patterson , 90 S.E.2d 706 (1956). Additionally, the Court of Appeals held in Speight v. … In Mitchell v. Board of Education , 1 N.C. App. 373 , 161 S.E.2d 645 (1968), the Court of Appeals held that a seven-year-old child is presumed to be incapable of contributory negligence. And in Sharpe v.

In re the Estate of Palestine

151 Misc. 100 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 6, 1934

(Matter of Brown, 131 Misc. 420, 421 .) … (Matter of Brown, 222 App. Div. 52 .)

Joselyn D. v. Oscar O.

132 Misc. 2d 964 · New York Family Court · Jul 15, 1986

If it had abated no useful purpose could be served in remitting the proceeding to the Board to make findings on the question of paternity. … The policy to expand the opportunity to obtain orders of filiation is reflected in decisional law invalidating short Stat *970 utes of Limitation in paternity actions (Pickett v Brown, 462 US 1 ; Mills v Habluetzel, 456 US

Bowman v. Yount Home Center, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 12, 1994

STAT. §§ 97-25 , 97-2 (19), and Hyler v. G.T.E. Products , 333 N.C. 258 (1993), so long as the medical treatment effects a cure, provides relief or lessens the period of disability. … Brown, or any physiotherapy or devices ordered by Dr. Brown for the.