Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.91s

  • In re the Probate of the Will of Egger

    188 Misc. 542 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 11, 1947

    Brown. The examination of Lois M. Brown and Donald S. Brown on the issue of undue influence is granted. … (Crellin v. Van Duzer, 267 App. Div. 744 ; Gillette v. Warren, 175 Misc. 614 , affd. 260 App. Div. 900 ; De Maria v. Gaidusek, 186 Misc. 340 ; Angell v. Booth, 169 Misc. 735 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • American Insurance v. Dunham & Wadsworth

    15 Wend. 10 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Jul 1, 1835

    A majority of the supreme court of errors of the state of Connecticut also decided, in the *14 case of Brown v. … Bowne v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • High Point Bank & Trust Co. v. Sapona Mfg. Co.

    2010 NCBC 11 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 22, 2010

    High Point Bank & Trust Co. v. Sapona Mfg. Co., 2010 NCBC 11. … Brown, Jr. served on the Board of Directors at Sapona. {9} Defendants C.W. McCrary, Jr., C. Walker McCrary, III, W.H. Redding, Jr., S. Steele Redding, John O.H. Toledano, John O.H. Toledano, Jr., Bruce T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Silas, Verna v. Brock Services

    2015 TN WC 5 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 15, 2015

    See generally, McCall v. Nat'! Health Care Corp., 100 S.W.3d 209,214 (Tenn. 2003). … The statement ofthe evidence must be approved by the Judge before the record is submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board. 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Howe

    213 S.W. 609 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 21, 1919

    Hudson v. Wheeler, 34 Tex. 356 ; Kuhlman v. Baker, 50 Tex. 630 ; Connoly v. Hammond, 58 Tex. 11 . … [Porter’s Lessee v. Cocke] Peck [Tenn.] 30; [Turney v. Williams] 7 Yerg. [Tenn.] 212; [Jones v. Read] 1 Humph. 346 ; [Marr v. Rucker] Id. 353; [Tubb v. Williams] 7 Humph. 367 .

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Tac Invs., LLC v. Rodgers

    2020 NCBC 88 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 7, 2020

    Since then, Rodgers has blocked the board from declaring another, most recently in February 2020. (See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 20, 21.) … See, e.g., Panzino v. 5Church, Inc., 2020 NCBC LEXIS 17, at *7–8 (N.C. Super. Ct. Feb. 12, 2020); Brown v. Secor, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 65, at *18– 19 (N.C. Super. Ct. July 28, 2017). 29.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barbara M. v. Harry M.

    117 Misc. 2d 142 · New York Family Court · Dec 6, 1982

    Accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction to specifically enforce the terms of a separation agreement (see Matter of Larney v Brown, 70 Misc 2d 546 ); however, the existence of the separation agreement does not preclude … (Kaplan v Wallshein, supra, p 829 ; see,' also, Gamble v Gamble, 71 AD2d 649 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Humphries v. Cleveland County Bd. of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 22, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of St. John v. STATE BD. OF TAX COM'RS

    698 N.E.2d 399 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 2, 1998

    John v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 691 N.E.2d 1387, 1390 (Ind.Tax Ct.1998) (order). Petitioners have moved for clarification of this paragraph. … See Bender v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 676 N.E.2d 1113 (Ind.Tax Ct.1997). Such objective errors are correctable pursuant to precise and exact standards.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-258 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1977

    Brown, Okl. 516 P.2d 526 (1973). … Schaff v. Rea, 103 Okl. 62 , 229 P. 472 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Route 17K Real Estate, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Newburgh

    101 N.Y.S.3d 740 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · May 9, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc. d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland

    2016 TN WC 130 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 25, 2016

    Brown, counsel for Mr. Pope, an attorney's fee based on twenty percent of the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Mr. Pope. 6. … and assigned to an appeals board judge for review.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1996

    Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 , 313-314 (1976). … Lamb v. Brown, 456 F.2d 18 (10th Cir. 1972) (citation omitted). A classification "will not be set aside if any state of facts reasonably may be conceived to justify it." McGowan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington Township Assessor, Allen County Assessor, and Allen County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals v. Verizon Data Services, Inc.

    43 N.E.3d 697 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 30, 2015

    V. Pet. Judicial Review Final Determination [Indiana Board] (“Pet’rs’ Br.”) at 8-11.) … See LTV Steel Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. New Hanover Bd. of Educ.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 10, 2000

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spear & Jackson (U.S.), Inc. v. State Tax Commission

    2 Or. Tax 153 · Oregon Tax Court · May 17, 1965

    Brown v. Maryland, 25 US (12 Wheat) 419, 6 L Ed 678 (1827); Low v. Austin, 80 US (13 Wall) 29, 20 L Ed 517 (1871). … Board of Review, City of Milwaukee, 15 Wis2d 330, 112 NW2d 914 (1961).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Underwriters v. Kirby Lumber Co.

    267 S.W. 703 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 20, 1924

    Stone v. Brown, 54 Tex. 342 . But it would be useless and impracticable for the title to express all of the provisions of a particular act and the details of each-provision. … Snyder v. Compton, 87 Tex. 377 , 28 S. W. 1061 ; Austin v. G., C., & S. F. R. R. Co., 45 Tex. 267 ; Stone v. Brown, 54 Tex. 343 ; Breen v. T. & P. R. R. Co., 44 Tex. 305 ; Morris & Cummings v.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Minnig, Katalin v. Walmart Associates, Inc.

    2020 TN WC 25 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 14, 2020

    See Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Reilly

    165 Misc. 214 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 10, 1937

    (Gall v. Gall, 114 N. Y. 109, 118 ; Caujolle v. Ferris, 23 id. 90, 106; Tracy v. Frey, 95 App. Div. 579, 583 ; Matter of Biersack, 96 Misc. 161 , 178; affd., 179 App. Div. 916 ; Ellis v. … (Do ugherty v. Equitable Life Insurance Co., 266 N. Y. 71 ; Gwynne v. Board of Education, 259 id. 191, 196; Matter of Sunderov, 156 Misc. 661, 664, 665 ; affd., 249 App. Div. 763 ; affd., 274 N.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Khelawan v. Corneil

    190 Misc. 2d 621 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 5, 2002

    Jackman-Brown, J. … revocation would affect the owner’s property interests (see, Matter of Schultz Mgt. v Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N.Y., 103 AD2d 687 [1st Dept]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.