Case law

Palmore v. Bd. of Educ. of Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist.

70 N.Y.S.3d 445 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Nov 21, 2017

Schillaci v. Vill. of Sackets Harbor Zoning Bd. of Appeals

67 N.Y.S.3d 129 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 19, 2017

Vollrath v. Corinthian Ophthalmic, Inc.

2014 NCBC 59 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 20, 2014

See, e.g., Stanback v. … See Brown v. Greene, 98 N.C. App. 377, 380, 390 S.E.2d 695, 697– 98 (1990); Ussery v. Taylor, 156 N.C. App. 684, 686, 577 S.E.2d 159, 161 (2003); Hamby v. Profile Prods., LLC, 197 N.C.

Ruggieri, June v. Amazon.Com LLC

2021 TN WC 185 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 16, 2021

The Appeals Board has held that “medical reports signed by a physician are admissible. See Morgan v. Macy’s, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Allen Brown, X allen@jallenbrownpllc.com employee’s attorney Kristen Stevenson, X Kcstevenson@mijs.com employer’s attorney

Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc. v. State

10 N.J. Tax 96 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 3, 1988

Fedders [Financial Corporation v. Director, Division of Taxation], 96 N.J. [376] at 386 [ 476 A.2d 741 (1984)]; Boys’ Club of Clifton, Inc. v. Township of Jefferson, 72 N.J. 389, 398 [ 371 A.2d 22 ] (1977). … Mal Bros. v. Taxation Division Director, 124 N.J.Super. 55, 61 , 304 A.2d 750 (App.Div.1973).

First Union Corp. v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

2001 NCBC 07 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 26, 2001

BROWNING, JOHN T. CASTEEN, III,) THOMAS K. HEARN, JR., GEORGE W. ) HENDERSON, III, W. HAYNE HIPP, LLOYD U.) NOLAND, III, JOHN C. … See Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc., 761 F.2d 162, (4th Cir. 1985); Andrews v. Fitzgerald, 823 F. Supp. 356, 379-80 (M.D.N.C. 1993).

Adum v. Albemarle Plantation Prop. Owners Ass'n

2021 NCBC 4 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 19, 2021

of Directors (the “Board”). … Finley v. Brown, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 78, at *15 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2017) (“[S]tanding arguments can be presented under both Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) arguments.” (quoting Sykes v.

Sterling National Bank & Trust Co. v. Merchants Bank

48 Misc. 2d 72 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 28, 1965

Board of Elections, Nassau County, 2 N Y 2d 413) and to avoid multiplicity of litigation and to determine ultimate rights of all parties in one trial (Galka v. City of Albany, 285 App. … (Vide Gielski v. State of New York, 3 Misc 2d 578; McMahon v. State of New York, 173 Misc. 1004 , affd. 261 App. Div. 879 ; also Haas v. Brown, 282 App. Div. 916 .)

Department of Professional Regulation v. Koo

28 Fla. Supp. 2d 216 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Aug 26, 1987

Rabideau also found that Koo maintained a number of Schedule III, IV, and V, controlled substances in his office which he dispensed to patients. … Hunter v. Department of Professional Regulation, 458 So.2d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See also Davis v. Department of Professional Regulation, 457 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Curtis v. Barnet

2011 NCBC 24 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 22, 2011

Curtis v. Barnet, 2011 NCBC 24. … BROWNING, ANN MAYNARD GRAY, ORDER & OPINION JAMES H. HANCE, JR., JAMES T. RHODES, and JAMES E.

Johnson, Joshua v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

2016 TN WC 174 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 1, 2016

He relied on Taylor v. Airgas Mid-South, Inc., No. W2012- 00621-WC-R3-WC, 2013 Tenn. LEXIS 304, at *5-8 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. Panel Feb. 26, 2013), and Robertson Co. Bd. of Educ. v. Knight, No. … Name Certified Via Fax Via Email Service Sent to: Mail Bill Brown, X WJB @Voll aw.com Employee's Attorney Kimberly Greuter

High Point Bank & Trust Co. v. Sapona Mfg. Co.

2010 NCBC 11 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 22, 2010

High Point Bank & Trust Co. v. Sapona Mfg. Co., 2010 NCBC 11. … Brown, Jr. served on the Board of Directors at Sapona. {9} Defendants C.W. McCrary, Jr., C. Walker McCrary, III, W.H. Redding, Jr., S. Steele Redding, John O.H. Toledano, John O.H. Toledano, Jr., Bruce T.

Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 1, 2003

Brown v. Board of Education , 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E.2d 335 (1967); Greene v. Board of Education , 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E.2d 129 (1953). 2. Defendant's named employee, Ethel M. … Greene v. Board of Education , supra . As the Court of Appeals stated in Slade vs. New Hanover Board of Education , 10 N.C.

Pineda v. Wayne Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 1, 2003

Brown v. Board of Education , 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E.2d 335 (1967); Greene v. Board of Education , 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E.2d 129 (1953). 2. Defendant's named employee, Ethel M. … Greene v. Board of Education , supra . As the Court of Appeals stated in Slade vs. New Hanover Board of Education , 10 N.C.

Panzino v. 5 Church, Inc.

2020 NCBC 13 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 12, 2020

See, e.g., Azure Dolphin, LLC v. Barton, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 90, at *23–24 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 2, 2017), aff’d, 371 N.C. 579, 821 S.E.2d 711 (2018) (citing examples); Brown v. Secor, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 65, at *18–19 (N.C. … Gusinsky v. Flanders Corp., 2013 NCBC LEXIS 43, at *11 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 25, 2013); see also Estate of Browne v. Thompson, 219 N.C. App. 637, 641, 727 S.E.2d 573, 576 (2012). 17.

Chiropractic Neurodiagnostics, P.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

11 Misc. 3d 644 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 8, 2006

(See Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas. Co., 90 NY2d 274 [1997]; Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195 [1997]; Zappone v Home Ins. Co., 55 NY2d 131 [1982].) … PLLC v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 10 Misc 3d 128[A] , 2005 NY Slip Op 51902[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2005]; A.B. Med. Servs. PLLC v American Tr. Ins.

Tac Invs., LLC v. Rodgers

2020 NCBC 88 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 7, 2020

Since then, Rodgers has blocked the board from declaring another, most recently in February 2020. (See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 20, 21.) … See, e.g., Panzino v. 5Church, Inc., 2020 NCBC LEXIS 17, at *7–8 (N.C. Super. Ct. Feb. 12, 2020); Brown v. Secor, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 65, at *18– 19 (N.C. Super. Ct. July 28, 2017). 29.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Chris Kannady, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 91

2024 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 2024

Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶ 10, 85 P.3d 841, 845. "The words of a statute will be given their plain and ordinary meaning unless it is contrary to the purpose and intent of the statute when considered as a whole." … Higgins Discussed 2002 OK 47, 49 P.3d 719, GRIMES v. OKLAHOMA CITY Discussed 2004 OK 7, 85 P.3d 841, FANNING v. BROWN Discussed 2009 OK 20, 206 P.3d 599, WELCH v. CROW Discussed 2019 OK 6, 441 P.3d 1094, MCINTOSH v.

Barbara M. v. Harry M.

117 Misc. 2d 142 · New York Family Court · Dec 6, 1982

Accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction to specifically enforce the terms of a separation agreement (see Matter of Larney v Brown, 70 Misc 2d 546 ); however, the existence of the separation agreement does not preclude … (Kaplan v Wallshein, supra, p 829 ; see,' also, Gamble v Gamble, 71 AD2d 649 .)

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 1994

See Warner v. Kiowa County Hospital Authority, 551 P.2d 1179 (Okla.App. 1976); 59 O.S. 46 .2. … Opinion No. 64-108 relied primarily on a New York decision, Frax Realty v.