Case law

Oakes, Christopher v. Duracap Asphalt Paving Company, Inc.

2025 TN WC App. 45 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 9, 2025

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Christopher Oakes Docket No. 2023-03-4913 v. … See Brown v. Hassler, No. E2019-01801-COA-R3-CV, 2020 Tenn. App. LEXIS 252, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 29, 2020) (“It is well settled that statements of counsel are not evidence or a substitute for testimony.”

In re the Estate of Harbeck

142 Misc. 57 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 25, 1931

Brown, the substituted trustee, was also one of the executors of Charles T. … Board of Missions (102 id. 99, 104); Hale v. Omaha *67 National Bank (49 id. 626, 634, 635); Price v. Palmer, ( 23 Hun, 504 , 506); Matter of Holmes ( 37 App. Div. 15 ; affd., 159 N. Y. 532 ); Ostrander v.

In Re Cicchetti

697 A.2d 297 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1997

See also Commonwealth v. Brown , 346 Pa. 192 , 29 A.2d 793 (1943); Commonwealth v. Buzak , 197 Pa. Super. 514 , 179 A.2d 248 (1962); Commonwealth v. Litman , 187 Pa. Super. 537 , 144 A.2d 592 (1958.) … See, Matter of Glancey , 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988); Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v. Snyder , 514 Pa. 142 , 523 A.2d 294 (1987).

Lancaster v. Carter

255 S.W. 392 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 7, 1923

McManus v. Crickett, 1 East, 67; Croft v. Alison, 4 Barn. & Ald. 590. … Co. v. Cooper, 88 Tex. 610 , 32 S.

In re the Will of Hamilton

185 Misc. 660 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 25, 1945

(Matter of Browning, 165 Misc. 819, 824 , supra.) … (Harrington v. Pier, 105 Wis. 485 .)

Bricker v. Rhoney Furniture House

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 5, 2004

Brown, an orthopedist. Plaintiff saw Dr. Brown on 26 July 1999 for a lumbar strain. On that date, Dr. Brown provided a note authorizing plaintiff to return to work on 2 August 1999 with no restrictions. … Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co. , 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982).

In Re Wachovia S'holders Litig.

2003 NCBC 10 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 19, 2003

Allen v. Ferrera , 141 N.C. App 284, 540 S.E.2d 761, 764 (2000); see also Winters v. First Union Corp., 2001 NCBC 08 (No. 01 CVS 5362, Forsyth County Super. Ct. July 13, 2001) (Tennille, J.) ; Garlock v. … is treated below. [10] See Greene v.

dillard/goldsboro Alumni & Friends, Inc. v. Smith

2016 NCBC 32 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 27, 2016

IV and V. 9 Const. and By-Laws, Art. V. 10 Id. concerning the appointment of the remaining national officers of DGAF.11 On October 16, 2013, the DGAF Board appointed Elizabeth Williams as the National Treasurer. … Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 326 N.C. 387, 393, 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990) (citation omitted).

Taylor v. Hill

221 S.W. 267 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 12, 1920

The same rule was applied in cases of mutual mistake, in Cox v. Barton, 212 S. W. 652 , decided by this section of the Commission and approved by the Supreme Court. … See Mansfield v. Wardlow, 91 S. W. 859 .

ST Owner, L.P. v. Novog

31 Misc. 3d 680 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 4, 2011

Florentino, were they - - “mr brown: He had agreement with - - “the court: - - two of the co-conspirators? “mr brown: They were, your Honor. And there were others. They were both being directed by another individual. … “This right to refuse to testify has been recognized as ‘one of the most valuable prerogatives of the citizen.’ ” (Id., quoting Brown v Walker, 161 US 591, 610 [1896].)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1977

Brigdes, Nathalie v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc.

2019 TN WC 46 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 19, 2019

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Concerning temporary partial disability benefits, Ms. … The Workers' Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Halliday v. McDougall

22 Wend. 264 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1839

Pratt, 16 Pick. 433 , and in Brown and others v. Crandall and others, 11 Conn. R. 93. … In the case of Whitney v. Sterling, 14 Johns. R. 216, the court say; The only question in the case is, whether the testimony is sufficient to charge Jacob Brown as a partner with the other defendants.

Opinion No. 68-263 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 1968

be deemed a Certified Shorthand Reporter, eligible for official appointment under Section No. 6, of this Act, and entitled to use the abbreviation `C.S.R.' after his name, and without extra charge shall receive from the Board … Brown v. State, 209 P.2d 715 , 89 Okl.Cr. 443 . There is no inherent or pre-existing power to punish for contempt beyond that which the courts possess.

Adams, Larita v. Verizon Wireless

2016 TN WC 191 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 18, 2016

Brown and Weikert that her ongoing condition is work related and has arisen primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment.” (Ex. 5 at 15; Ex. 6.) Ms. Adams continued to see Dr. … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).

Town of Irvington v. 1125-1127 Clinton Avenue Associates

5 N.J. Tax 420 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 31, 1983

Niktan Realty Co. v. City of Passaic, 1 N.J.Tax 393 (Tax Ct.1980). See Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965). … Greenwald v. Metuchen, 1 N.J.Tax 228 (Tax Ct.1980). As neither party has met its burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness of the county board judgment, Warren v.

Terranova v. Lehr Constr. Co.

30 N.Y.3d 564 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 19, 2017

The Board and Appellate Division mistakenly concluded that the inverse of that statement is true, but it is not. … By letter agreement, the parties stated that the "lien reimbursement reflects a reduction of the carrier's lien pursuant to Kelly v.[ ] State Insurance Funds [sic] and all parties reserve all their rights to Burns v.[ ] Varriale

Dale v. Simon

267 S.W. 467 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 20, 1924

Ward v. Scarborough (Tex. Com. App.) 236 S. W. 437 ; Landa v. Obert, 78 Tex. 33 , 14 S. W. 297 . … Guetzkow Bros. v. Breese, 96 Wis. 591 , 72 N. W. 45 , 65 Am. St. Rep. 83 ; Prickett v. Madison County, 14 Ill. App. 454 ; Chicago v. Sperbeck, 69 Ill. App. 562 ; Joannin v. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564 , 52 N. W. 217 , 16 L.

Cook v. Champlain Transportation Co.

1 Denio 91 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · May 15, 1845

(Rathbun v. Payne, 19 Wend. 399 ; Bradley v. Waterhouse, 3 Carr. & Payne, 318; Lack v. Seward, 4 id. 106; Plucknell v. Wilson, 5 id. 375; Boss v. Litton, id. 407; Williams v. Holland, 6 id. 23; Woolf v. … Beard, 8 id. 373; Brown v. Maxwell, 6 Hill, 592 ; Vanderplank v. Miller, 1 Moo. & Malk. 169.) This principle has a broad and extended application^ but nevertheless admits of exceptions and qualifications. (Lynch v.

Department of Professional Regulation v. Goldstein

28 Fla. Supp. 2d 224 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Dec 9, 1987

Section 465.023(l)(c), Florida Statutes, provides that disciplinary action may be taken against a pharmacy permittee who has: (c) Violated any of the requirements of this chapter of any of the rules of the Board of Pharmacy … RECOMMENDA TION Based on all of the foregoing, I recommend that the Board of Pharmacy enter a final order in these consolidated cases to the following effect: (a) Finding the Respondent Gus Goldstein guilty of the violations