Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.81s
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. Ag Ins. sa/nv
2019 NCBC 73 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 6, 2019
Todd Brown and Ryan G. … Good and Duke’s Board of Directors in 2010, and (v) whether Duke “expected or intended the alleged property damage” at its coal ash sites through its ash pond design. (Redacted Joining Defs.’ Mem. Supp.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAsd Three Rivers Ma Solar, LLC v. the Planning Board of the Town of Wilbraham
Massachusetts Land Court · Apr 5, 2021
Britton v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Gloucester, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 68 , 74-5 (2003). In addition, the court generally gives deference to a board's interpretation of its own Bylaw. Duteau v. … Compare The Bible Speaks v. Board of Appeals of Lenox, 8 Mass. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLawrence Teachers' Ass'n v. N.Y.S. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.
67 N.Y.S.3d 577 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 24, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text2014 TN WC 18 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 26, 2014
See generally, McCall v. Nat '! Health Care Corp., 100 S.W. 3d 209, 214 (Tenn. 2003). … Brown, Esq.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Armstrong. Election Cases 279 · New York State Assembly · Jan 2, 1855
Brown swears, that he was a minor and voted in the town of Mexico, Oswego county, at the last election for Jacob M. … He also swears that this question of residence of Peck was submitted to the board of' inspectors, and upon examination, they decided to receive the vote of Mr. Peck.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlenn, Brantouris v. Jameson Industries, LLC -- Corrected
2023 TN WC App. 32 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 25, 2023
Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). As such, although Insurer filed what it called a “motion for declaratory judgment,” we elect to treat it as a motion for summary judgment. … As we recently explained in Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlenn, Brantouris v. Jameson Industries, LLC
2023 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 24, 2023
Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). As such, although Insurer filed what it called a “motion for declaratory judgment,” we elect to treat it as a motion for summary judgment. … As we recently explained in Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 2000
Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 (Okla. 1997), the Supreme Court was again asked to review within the context of Sections 14 and 17 of Article X, a city's economic development plan. … See Board of Educ. v. State, 109 P. 563 , 566 (Okla. 1910). At the time Board of Education was decided, the Legislature had conferred no power to municipalities with regard to schools.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSchellin v. Department of Revenue
15 Or. Tax 126 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 7, 2000
Brown testified that he did not specifically remember the conversation. However, he was fairly familiar with act of God application/appeal procedures. … Smith v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 206, 210 (1994).
Cited 25 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Brown
124 Misc. 473 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 5, 1924
For some time before 1912 the decedent was the board member of Vernon C. Brown & Co., being engaged daily on the floor of the Stock Exchange. … In Wilson v. Williams (29 L. R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStokes v. Johnston Cty. Bd. of Education
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 29, 2000
Defendant, Johnston County Board of Education, is a State agency and Linda Harris was an employee of the defendant at the time of the alleged negligence. 4. … On 20 April 1998 Sunny Hill Road was part of the regular bus route set by the Johnston County Board of Education. Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedB. F. & C. M. Davis Co. v. W. E. Callaghan Const. Co.
298 S.W. 273 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 5, 1927
A boarding house might be conducted by the contractor (like some company stores concerning which states have legislated Keokee [Consol.] Coke Co. v. Taylor, 234 U. S. 224 , 34 S. Ct. 856 , 58 L. … E. 1090 ; Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners (D. C.) 274 F. 662 ; Henderson Bridge Co. v. McGrath, 134 U. S. 260 , 10 S. Ct. 730 , 33 L. Ed. 934 ; Wood v. Port Wayne, 119 U. S. 312 , 7 S.
Cited 15 timesPublishedCarter, James v. Ricoh America Corp.
2020 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 2, 2020
Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Pele I. Godkin joined. Carolina V. Martin, Nashville, Tennessee, for the employer-appellant, Ricoh America Corp. … State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519, 526 (Tenn. 2009); Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp.
Cited 0 timesPublished79 Misc. 2d 504 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jun 10, 1974
(People v. Duchin, 12 N Y 2d 351, 354; People v. Carroll, 3 N Y 2d 686.) The waiver of jury is a relatively modern concept. In thirteenth century England, as provided in Statute of Westminster 1(3 Edw. … Y. 119 ,130 Matter of Broderick v. City of New York, 295 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAlaska Airlines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
10 Or. Tax 518 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 14, 1987
Defendant’s citation of Communication Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 156 Cal App 3d 726, 203 Cal Rptr 779 (1984), which was an income tax case, is likewise of little benefit in this case. … Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 2009
Board of Regents v. Livingston , 111 P.3d 734 , 737 (Okla.Civ.App. 2005), and to a suit by one municipality against another municipality which involved purely fiscal accounting between the two municipalities in Brown v. … Brown v. W. M. Acree Trust , 999 P.2d 1119 , 1121 (Okla.Civ.App. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Estate of Silverstein
56 Misc. 2d 680 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 8, 1968
The two classes are not invaribly or commonly the same (Matter of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc., 237 N. Y. 367 ; Matter of Battalico v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 250 App. Div. 258 ). … (See Matter of Commissioner of Taxation v. General Elec. Co., 278 App. Div. 414 ; Matter of Gruhn v. Miller Brown, Inc., 275 App. Div. 975 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished168 Ariz. 10 · Arizona Tax Court · Apr 30, 1991
Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. Warren, 97 Ariz. 180 , 398 P.2d 892 (1965)(en banc). … Brown owned the DC Ranch as partners from some time before 1930 until Brown's death in the early 1950's. When Brown died, the ranch was divided, with Marley taking the south half and Brown's heirs the north half.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn re the Supplementary Appraisal of the Estate of Durfee
10 Mills Surr. 173 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1913
The leading case upon that subject in this state is Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 152 , and the following cases sustain that proposition : Matter of Albrecht, 136 N. Y. 91 ; Brown v. Brown, 79 Hun, 44 ; Toole v. … Board of Supervisors, 13 App. Div. 472 ; Hiles v. Fisher, 144 N. Y. 306 ; Zorntlein v. Bram, 100 id. 13.
Cited 2 timesPublished23 S.W.2d 316 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 29, 1930
However, in our opinion, the above-quoted holding in the Sealf Case is clearly overruled *318 by the Supreme Court in the later case of Brown v. Mitchell, supra. In Brown v. … In the case at bar the Court of Civil Appeals itself very correctly holds that Scalf v. Collin County is overruled by Brown v. Mitchell.
Cited 24 timesPublished
Ask Donna