Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.81s

  • Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. Ag Ins. sa/nv

    2019 NCBC 73 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 6, 2019

    Todd Brown and Ryan G. … Good and Duke’s Board of Directors in 2010, and (v) whether Duke “expected or intended the alleged property damage” at its coal ash sites through its ash pond design. (Redacted Joining Defs.’ Mem. Supp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Asd Three Rivers Ma Solar, LLC v. the Planning Board of the Town of Wilbraham

    Massachusetts Land Court · Apr 5, 2021

    Britton v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Gloucester, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 68 , 74-5 (2003). In addition, the court generally gives deference to a board's interpretation of its own Bylaw. Duteau v. … Compare The Bible Speaks v. Board of Appeals of Lenox, 8 Mass. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawrence Teachers' Ass'n v. N.Y.S. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    67 N.Y.S.3d 577 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 24, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Burnette, Gail v. K-Mart

    2014 TN WC 18 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 26, 2014

    See generally, McCall v. Nat '! Health Care Corp., 100 S.W. 3d 209, 214 (Tenn. 2003). … Brown, Esq.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Contested Seat between Warner

    1 Armstrong. Election Cases 279 · New York State Assembly · Jan 2, 1855

    Brown swears, that he was a minor and voted in the town of Mexico, Oswego county, at the last election for Jacob M. … He also swears that this question of residence of Peck was submitted to the board of' inspectors, and upon examination, they decided to receive the vote of Mr. Peck.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glenn, Brantouris v. Jameson Industries, LLC -- Corrected

    2023 TN WC App. 32 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 25, 2023

    Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). As such, although Insurer filed what it called a “motion for declaratory judgment,” we elect to treat it as a motion for summary judgment. … As we recently explained in Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glenn, Brantouris v. Jameson Industries, LLC

    2023 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 24, 2023

    Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). As such, although Insurer filed what it called a “motion for declaratory judgment,” we elect to treat it as a motion for summary judgment. … As we recently explained in Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 2000

    Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 (Okla. 1997), the Supreme Court was again asked to review within the context of Sections 14 and 17 of Article X, a city's economic development plan. … See Board of Educ. v. State, 109 P. 563 , 566 (Okla. 1910). At the time Board of Education was decided, the Legislature had conferred no power to municipalities with regard to schools.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schellin v. Department of Revenue

    15 Or. Tax 126 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 7, 2000

    Brown testified that he did not specifically remember the conversation. However, he was fairly familiar with act of God application/appeal procedures. … Smith v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 206, 210 (1994).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Brown

    124 Misc. 473 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 5, 1924

    For some time before 1912 the decedent was the board member of Vernon C. Brown & Co., being engaged daily on the floor of the Stock Exchange. … In Wilson v. Williams (29 L. R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stokes v. Johnston Cty. Bd. of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 29, 2000

    Defendant, Johnston County Board of Education, is a State agency and Linda Harris was an employee of the defendant at the time of the alleged negligence. 4. … On 20 April 1998 Sunny Hill Road was part of the regular bus route set by the Johnston County Board of Education. Ms.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • B. F. & C. M. Davis Co. v. W. E. Callaghan Const. Co.

    298 S.W. 273 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 5, 1927

    A boarding house might be conducted by the contractor (like some company stores concerning which states have legislated Keokee [Consol.] Coke Co. v. Taylor, 234 U. S. 224 , 34 S. Ct. 856 , 58 L. … E. 1090 ; Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners (D. C.) 274 F. 662 ; Henderson Bridge Co. v. McGrath, 134 U. S. 260 , 10 S. Ct. 730 , 33 L. Ed. 934 ; Wood v. Port Wayne, 119 U. S. 312 , 7 S.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Carter, James v. Ricoh America Corp.

    2020 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 2, 2020

    Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Pele I. Godkin joined. Carolina V. Martin, Nashville, Tennessee, for the employer-appellant, Ricoh America Corp. … State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519, 526 (Tenn. 2009); Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Pasaro

    79 Misc. 2d 504 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jun 10, 1974

    (People v. Duchin, 12 N Y 2d 351, 354; People v. Carroll, 3 N Y 2d 686.) The waiver of jury is a relatively modern concept. In thirteenth century England, as provided in Statute of Westminster 1(3 Edw. … Y. 119 ,130 Matter of Broderick v. City of New York, 295 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

    10 Or. Tax 518 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 14, 1987

    Defendant’s citation of Communication Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 156 Cal App 3d 726, 203 Cal Rptr 779 (1984), which was an income tax case, is likewise of little benefit in this case. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2009)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 2009

    Board of Regents v. Livingston , 111 P.3d 734 , 737 (Okla.Civ.App. 2005), and to a suit by one municipality against another municipality which involved purely fiscal accounting between the two municipalities in Brown v. … Brown v. W. M. Acree Trust , 999 P.2d 1119 , 1121 (Okla.Civ.App. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Silverstein

    56 Misc. 2d 680 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 8, 1968

    The two classes are not invaribly or commonly the same (Matter of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc., 237 N. Y. 367 ; Matter of Battalico v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 250 App. Div. 258 ). … (See Matter of Commissioner of Taxation v. General Elec. Co., 278 App. Div. 414 ; Matter of Gruhn v. Miller Brown, Inc., 275 App. Div. 975 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • TITLE USA v. Maricopa County

    168 Ariz. 10 · Arizona Tax Court · Apr 30, 1991

    Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. Warren, 97 Ariz. 180 , 398 P.2d 892 (1965)(en banc). … Brown owned the DC Ranch as partners from some time before 1930 until Brown's death in the early 1950's. When Brown died, the ranch was divided, with Marley taking the south half and Brown's heirs the north half.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re the Supplementary Appraisal of the Estate of Durfee

    10 Mills Surr. 173 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1913

    The leading case upon that subject in this state is Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 152 , and the following cases sustain that proposition : Matter of Albrecht, 136 N. Y. 91 ; Brown v. Brown, 79 Hun, 44 ; Toole v. … Board of Supervisors, 13 App. Div. 472 ; Hiles v. Fisher, 144 N. Y. 306 ; Zorntlein v. Bram, 100 id. 13.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pickering v. Harris

    23 S.W.2d 316 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 29, 1930

    However, in our opinion, the above-quoted holding in the Sealf Case is clearly overruled *318 by the Supreme Court in the later case of Brown v. Mitchell, supra. In Brown v. … In the case at bar the Court of Civil Appeals itself very correctly holds that Scalf v. Collin County is overruled by Brown v. Mitchell.

    Cited 24 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.