Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • Horsman v. Department of Professional Regulation

    12 Fla. Supp. 2d 196 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Mar 6, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Savoy v. Univ. of Akron

    2013 Ohio 5928 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 10, 2013

    At plaintiff’s request, the decision of the hearing board was reviewed by the UA Appeal Board and on June 12, 2008, plaintiff was notified by letter that the hearing board’s decision was upheld. … Brown Peter D. Traska Jeanna R. Volp P.O.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Brown

    5 Misc. 2d 657 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 30, 1957

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dennis, Jr., Robert v. Polymer Components

    2016 TN WC 186 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 10, 2016

    He cited Tryon v. Saturn Corp., 254 S.W.3d 321, 328-330 (Tenn. 2008); Williams v. Saturn Corp., No. M2004-01215-WC-R3-CV, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 1032, at *6-9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. Panel Nov. 15, 2005); and Hackney v. … Brown, Esq. X wjb@vollaw.com Gordon Aulgur, Esq.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greer v. Evangeline of Lenoir

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 31, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1993)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1993

    THE 1981 LAW CAME ABOUT AS THE RESULT OF THE CASE OF KIRK V. BOARD OF CTY.COM'RS. MUSKOGEE CTY, 595 P.2D 1334 (OKLA.1979), WHICH ESSENTIALLY STRUCK DOWN THE 1978 SALARY SCHEDULE. … THE CASE IS KAVANAQH V. BROWN, 206 F.SUPP. 479 (E.D.MICH. 1962). THE DECISION BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN KAVANAAH WAS ULTIMATELY APPEALED TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND WAS SUMMARILY AFFIRMED. KAVANAQH V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • David A Gertz v. Porter County Assessor

    Indiana Tax Court · Feb 3, 2026

    P’ship v. Brown Twp. Assessor, 851 N.E.2d 399, 401 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2006) (quoting previous version of statute). … Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 471 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2005), trans. denied. And a party “must walk the Board, and this Court, through every element of their analyses.” Garrett LLC v. Noble Cnty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brummel v. Architectural Review Bd. of Vill. of E. Hills

    71 N.Y.S.3d 4 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Feb 13, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Opinion No. 71-211 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1971

    In the case of Brown v. … State Election Board, 369 P.2d 140 (Okl. 1962), the Court stated in the body of its opinion: "Public officers have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised in the manner prescribed

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gregg v. First. Nat. Bank In Brownsville

    26 S.W.2d 179 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 9, 1930

    Browne unquestionably gives James A. Browne an undivided one-fifth interest in all the property owned by testatrix. The probate of such will fixed and confirmed that right. Robertson v. Du Bose, 76 Tex. 1 , 13 S. … Baker v. Clepper, 26 Tex. 629 , 84 Am. Dec. 591 ; Taul v. Wright, 45 Tex. 388 ; Graves v. Griffin (Tex. Com. App.) 228 S. W. 913 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-253 (1975) Ag Part II of Part II

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975

    The rule of the Brown case, supra, on delegation of legislative authority, which appears to be the only statement of that kind in the country, utilizes reasoning that is not consistent historically with the reasoning on similar … (Emphasis added) In Wells v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brummel v. Bd. of Trs. of the Vill. of E. Hills

    73 N.Y.S.3d 121 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Apr 3, 2018

    Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Board of Trustees of the Village of East Hills, N.Y. and Michael R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. DiNapoli

    70 N.Y.S.3d 881 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Feb 13, 2018

    Board of Trustees of N.Y. … Board of Trustees Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II , 60 N.Y.2d 347 , 352, 469 N.Y.S.2d 635 , 457 N.E.2d 740 [1983] [emphasis added]; see Matter of Starnella v.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Lawrence Teachers' Ass'n v. N.Y.S. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    67 N.Y.S.3d 577 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 24, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Piper v. Wake County

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 17, 2007

    Barham, Jerry Brown or Alan Foster) about his alleged back injury. Mr. Barham, Mr. Brown, nor Mr. … Callaway is a board-certified orthopedic surgeon.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Corwin v. British Am. Tobacco P.L.C.

    2015 NCBC 74 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 4, 2015

    Reynolds Tobacco Company acquired BAT’s United States subsidiary, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. … Estate of Browne v. Thompson, 219 N.C. App. 637, 639–40, 727 S.E.2d 573, 575–76 (2012) (refusing to reject the “special injury” test pursuant to Tooley in favor of the Barger test).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ehrenhaus v. Baker

    2008 NCBC 20 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 5, 2008

    Ehrenhaus v. Baker, 2008 NCBC 20. … See generally Barger v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glenn, Brantouris v. Jameson Industries, LLC -- Corrected

    2023 TN WC App. 32 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 25, 2023

    Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). As such, although Insurer filed what it called a “motion for declaratory judgment,” we elect to treat it as a motion for summary judgment. … As we recently explained in Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glenn, Brantouris v. Jameson Industries, LLC

    2023 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 24, 2023

    Ferguson v. Brown, 291 S.W.3d 381, 387 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). As such, although Insurer filed what it called a “motion for declaratory judgment,” we elect to treat it as a motion for summary judgment. … As we recently explained in Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. Planning Bd. of the Town of Mamakating

    70 N.Y.S.3d 446 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Nov 20, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.