Case law

Assad v. Department of Professional Regulation

25 Fla. Supp. 2d 201 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Jun 12, 1987

On or about June 27, 1985, a probable cause panel of the Board of Veterinary Medicine met to receive and review investigative reports resulting from complaints received from certain individuals concerning Petitioner’s treatment … Upon presentation to the Board of Veterinary Medicine certain paragraphs of the settlement stipulation were amended which nonetheless resulted in dismissing all remaining cases and charges.

Department of Professional Regulation v. Cray

33 Fla. Supp. 2d 181 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · May 24, 1988

On January 15, 1986, Respondent boarded the ship Act 5 as her state pilot for approaching an intended berth at Port Everglades. *183 3. … RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED: That the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Pilot Commissioners enter a Final Order dismissing the Administrative

Board of Publications of Methodist Church v. State Tax Commission

1 Or. Tax 413 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 8, 1963

School of Bible v. Mult. … Physicians Serv. v.

In re the Estate of Reinhardt

202 Misc. 424 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 22, 1952

In Newton v. Scott ( 254 App. … (Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens *427 County Trust Co., 226 N. Y. 225, 233 ; Ward v. City Trust Co., 192 id. 61, 70, 71.) ” (See, also, Watterson v. Tremaine, 24 N. Y. S. 2d 830; Williamson v. Brown, 15 N.

Western

1 Rep. Cont. El. 144 · Massachusetts House of Representatives · Jul 1, 1813

The said Field was chairman of the board of selectmen, who admitted five persons notoriously unqualified as to property, who were friendly to the election of said Field, to vote at said election, notwithstanding the objections … The names of the persons so admitted are Joel Barrows, Aaron Hobbs, John Brown, Amri Strickland, and Samuel Monroe, the last of whom, the sitting member ad *145 mitted, before the committee, not to have the requisite qualification

Opinion No. 76-238 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 1976

See, Baird v. State Bar of Arizona, 401 U.S. 1 , 27 L.Ed.2d 639 (1971); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967)) Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301 , 14 L.Ed.2d 398 (1965); Baggett v. … Further, in Board of Public Instruction v.

Carriage Four Associates v. Teaneck Township

13 N.J. Tax 172 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 29, 1993

Terrace View Gardens v. … State v. Township of Union, 36 N.J.L. 309, 311 (Sup.Ct.1873); Brown v. Brown, 72 N.J.Eq. 667, 675, 65 A. 739 (Ch.1907).

Opinion No. 69-182 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1969

Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 , reaffirmed in Brown v. … State Election Board, 369 P.2d 140 , sets forth the applicable rule in paragraph 11 of the syllabus, as follows: "Public officers have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised

Ramsey v. Cent. State Univ. Bd. of Trustees

2025 Ohio 2171 · Ohio Court of Claims · May 30, 2025

See generally Brown v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 814 Fed.Appx. 72, 80 (6th Cir. 2020) (poor job performance is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for an adverse employment action);8 Harper v. … City of Cleveland, 781 F.App’x 389, 396 (6th 8 In Brown v.

Seay v. Wal-Mart

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 1, 2005

Holley v. ACTS, Inc ., 357 N.C. 228 , 231 , 581 S.E.2d 750 , 752 (2003). "[T]he [employee] must prove that the accident was a causal factor [of the injury] by a `preponderance of the evidence[.]'" Ballenger v. … Young v. Hickory Bus. Furn ., 353 N.C. 227 , 230 , 538 S.E.2d 912 , 915 (2000).

In re Bond

23 Fla. Supp. 206 · Florida Industrial Commission · Jul 31, 1964

Florida Unemployment Compensation Board of Review — A. WORLEY BROWN, Chairman, WALTER L. LIGHTSEY, Member, STIRLING TURNER, Member. … This cause came on for final administrative disposition by the board of review at Tallahassee on July 22, 1964, on its own motion, and was reviewed upon the record.

Ruggieri, June v. Amazon.com, LLC

2021 TN WC App. 73 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 7, 2021

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … Allen Brown X allen@jallenbrownpllc.com Kenneth M.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Osburn, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 81

2024 OK AG 12 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 2024

. § 3-103 and acknowledging that the State Board of Education "takes official actions of the Board by a majority vote"); see also Crawford v. … Oct. 26, 2010) ("The power to waive the privilege rests with the Board, and the actions of an individual Board member alone cannot waive the privilege."); see also Brown v. Unified Sch. Dist.

Opinion No. 72-289 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1972

Finley v. State Election Board of Oklahoma, Okl., 325 P.2d 1037 and Johnson v. State Election Board, Okl., 370 P.2d 551 . … Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 173 , 170 P.2d 200 .

Gafco, Inc. v. H. D. S. Mercantile Corp.

47 Misc. 2d 661 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Sep 9, 1965

Seymour Schwartz, a certified public accountant, was the sole stockholder and president of HDS and with his wife, the secretary, constituted the board of directors. … (Brown Packing Co. v. Lewis, 185 Misc. 445 ; Leifer v. Murphy, 149 Misc. 455 .) There can be no question but that this assignment was voluntary.

Wallace v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Edu.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 10, 2011

Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 NC 706 , 709 , 365 SE2d 898 , 900 (1988). … Lewis v. Brunston , 78 N.C. App. 678 , 683 , 338 S.E.2d. 595 , 599 (1986). *Page 8 4. Plaintiffs have failed to prove that Ms. Diggs breached a duty of care owed to Plaintiffs. Pulley v.

Nazario v. State

24 Misc. 3d 443 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 27, 2009

[2000]; Gullo v Graham, 255 AD2d 975 [1998]; Brown v Roland, 215 AD2d 1000 [1995], lv dismissed 87 NY2d 861 [1995]). … As “[hindsight reasoning is insufficient to defeat summary judgment” this cause of action must be dismissed (Brown v Bauman, 42 AD3d 390, 392 [2007]).

People v. Lovette

55 Misc. 3d 1097 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 31, 2017

The defendant has apparently overlooked that (a) the Smith decision applied to grand jury and trial evidence, not misdemeanor pleadings (People v Brown, 15 Misc 3d 1143[A] , 2007 NY Slip Op 51129[U] [Crim Ct, NY County 2007 … The right to confrontation is a trial right” (People v Brown, 15 Misc 3d 1143[A] , 2007 NY Slip Op 51129[U] , *3 n 5 [Crim Ct, NY County 2007, Mandelbaum, J.]). *1103 The court in People v Etienne ( 192 Misc 2d 90 [Nassau

People v. Laureano

29 Misc. 3d 664 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 23, 2010

The defendant’s reliance on People v Bright ( 71 NY2d 376 [1988]) and People v Brown ( 25 NY2d 374 [1969]) for the proposition that the subway beyond the turnstile is a public place is misplaced. … That is the area where people who have paid their fares wait to board the subway trains.

Ringen, Joseph v. Vanquish Worldwide

2016 TN WC 20 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 28, 2016

Wheetley v. State, No. M2013-01707-WC-R3-WC, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 476, at *5 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel June 25, 2014) (citing Excel Polymers, LLC v. Broyles, 302 S.W.3d 268, 274 (Tenn. 2009); Cloyd v. … Allen Brown 6. Notice of Limited Appearance submitted by J. Allen Brown 7. Vanquish’s Motion to Dismiss or an Extension of Time filed November 14, 2015 8. Mr.