Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1991

(Brown v. Hartlage (1982) 456 U.S. 45, 54; see Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosley (1972) 408 U.S. 92, 101; Shelton v. Tucker (1960) 364 U.S. 479, 488; Thornhill v. Alabama (1940) 310 U.S. 88, 96.) … (Pittsburgh United School Dist. v. California School Employees Assn. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 875, 888-889, quoting Thornhill v. Alabama, supra, 310 U.S. at 103; see also, Brown v. Hartlage, supra, 456 U.S. at 52; Abood v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1994

See, e.g., Brown v. City of Stuttgart, 312 Ark. 97 , 847 S.W.2d 710 (1993). As such, they may constitute "interest-bearing evidences of indebtedness" under Article 16, 1. … See generally Altheimer v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee District, 79 Ark. 229 , 95 S.W. 140 (1906).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1974

Buckley v. Coyle Public School System, 476 F.2d 92 (10th Cir. 1973); Heath v. Westerville Board of Education, 345 F. Supp. 501 (S.D.Ohio 1972); Bravo v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, 345 F. … Chesterfield County School Board, 474 F.2d 395 (4th Cir. 1973); Schattman v.

(2001)

86 Op. Att'y Gen. 66 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2001

You attached to your request a memorandum of the Assistant County Attorney assigned as counsel to the Board of License Commissioners for Frederick County (the "Liquor Board"), advising that licensed premises do not include … Miller v. State, 174 Md. 362 , 374 , 198 A. 710 (1938) (statute did not authorize police officers to enter the defendant's apartment, located in the same building as a tavern, without a warrant); Brown v. State, 3 Md.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1953

Coe v. Harrison, 217 Ala. 80 114 So. 905 (1927); Jeffries v. Rowe, 63 Ind. 592 (197%); State ex rel. Johnston v. Donworth, 127 MO. App. 377, 105 S.W. 1055 (lgO'();Corn.v. Yeakel, 13 Pa. Co. Ct. 615 (18%); State e; rel. … Fugina v. ;i;;w~) ;;: W;;.p;a 2;C@31ij1;49Eq3 ( 926); Brown v.*Woods, Contra: Plunkett v. Miller, 162'Miss. 149, '137So. j37 (1931). Hon. Henry B.

Opinion No. (2010)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 2010

BROWN JR. Attorney General TAYLOR S. CAREY Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE MICHAEL P. … Chapman , 16 Cal. 2d at 636 , 643 ; see also 38 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 121 , 125 (1961). 13 Dibb v. Co. of San Diego , 8 Cal. 4th 1200 , 1212 (1994) (emphasis in original). 14 Spreckels v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1993

Brown Hutchinson City Attorney P.O. Box 1567 Hutchinson, Kansas 67504-1567 Joseph O'Sullivan Reno County Counselor 315 W. 1st Street P.O. Box 2066 Hutchinson, Kansas 67504-2066 Dear Mr. Brown and Mr. … Garrett , 235 Kan. 768 (1984); State v. Pinchon , 15 Kan. App. 2d 527 (1991)], determining liability for medical costs [ Mt. Carmel Medical Center v. Board of County Commissioners , 1 Kan.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1995

Brown Opinion No. … Paid board and commission members are “employees” for purposes of the Texas Tort Claims Act. See supra note 1.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 2001

See e.g., generally, Kellems v. … Brown, 163 Conn. 478 , 313 A.2d 53 (1972) (court would presume that legislature used terms in a tax statute in light of federal income tax practice and existing regulations) and Goldberg Co. v.

(2001)

86 Op. Att'y Gen. 253 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 2001

See California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980); FTC v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 504 U.S. 621 (1992). … See Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire, 471 U.S. 34 , 46 n. 10 (1985); Earles v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Sep 2, 1977

Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners, 82 So. 346 (Fla. 1919). … Accord : Brown v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 2004

In Morgan v. … Carl Heck Engineers, Inc. , 346 So.2d 769 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977), writ denied , 349 So.2d 873 (La. 1977); Browning-Ferris, Inc. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 16, 2000

Brown, 253 Ark. 222 , 485 S.W.2d 204 (1972) (funds held by county); State Board of Education v. Aycock, 198 Ark. 640 , 130 S.W.2d 6 (1939) (funds held by state); Walls v. … State Board of Edu., 195 Ark. 222 , 112 S.W.2d 18 (1937) (funds held by state); Board of Education of Lonoke Cty. v. Lonoke Cty., 181 Ark. 1046 , 29 S.W.2d 268 (1930) (funds held by county); Ruff v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1944

Brown, 38 Ida. 136, 221 P. 139. … Stetr v. Fox, (1939 Austin C. A.) 133 s. w. (26) 987.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1978

See Lake Howell Water and Reclamation District v. State, 268 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1972). … Rawls v. State, 122 So. 222 (Fla. 1929); Brown v. St. Lucie County, 153 So. 906 (Fla. 1934); State v. Reardon, 154 So. 868 (Fla. 1934); Gavagan v. Marshall, 33 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1948).

Opinion No. (1986)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 1986

Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 267 , 165 S.W.2d 657 , 662 (banc 1942). … Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, 296 S.W.2d 492 , 487-488 (Mo. banc 1956). In Barnes v. Bailey, No. 67631 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 2-19-86) (may be subject to motion for rehearing) and Payne v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1998

No. 6 v. Brown, 216 Ark. 14 , 223 S.W.2d 818 (1949). … Regarding the legality of any particular transportation policy or practice, I have stated that: . . . a school board's policy offering transportation to some students and not others should not be subject to challenge, provided

Opinion No. (1994)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1994

In Parriott v. … Brown County Water Imp.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1997

In other words, may a state agency require a license for such work, even if the State Licensing Board states no license is required? 3. … See generally Brown Root, Inc. v. Hempstead County Sand Gravel, Inc., 767 F.2d 464 (8th Cir. 1985) (noting that where a special statute governs a particular subject, it will apply instead of a general law).

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 2007

Catherine Hospital v. Roop , 34 Kan.App.2d 638 , 642-643 (2005). 5 This phrase was also added to K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 79-1702 . 6 Brown v. U.S.D. No. 333 , 261 Kan. 134 , 141-142 (1996). 7 Link, Inc. v. … Price , 210 Kan. 337 , 339 (1972). 20 Shriver v. Board of County Comm'rs of Sedgwick County , 189 Kan. 548 , 556 (1962). See also School Dist. No. 40, Ford County v.