Case law

Opinion No. (1996)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1996

It should be noted that in State v. … The Nebraska Board of Pardons is a part of the executive branch of government. See Johnson v. Cunningham v. Exon , 199 Neb. 154 , 158 , 256 N.W.2d 869 , 871 (1977); Campion v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 6, 1995

State v. Wood , 231 Kan. 699 (1982). The legislature's inclusion of these permissive changes excludes all other possible changes to the method of selection scenario. … Moore v. City of Lawrence , 232 Kan. 353 (1982). In 1987 the Kansas legislature amended K.S.A. 80-2508 by adding an additional method of selection.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 1985

Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed, 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Gardinier, Inc. v. … Hathaway v. Smith, 35 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1948). See also, Keating v. State ex rel.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1971

"Assuming creation of a separate board under either Section 51.016 or 51.017, which of the two boards, the Independent School District Board or Junior College District Board, would then have jurisdiction … v(c), All rights and titles to the school property of the district, whether real or personal, shall be vested In the trustees and their successors in office. . . !

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1967

M-30 (1967), the Board questions that it would be authorized to license this individual, but the Board would like to request for the At- torney General's Office to reconsider Attorney General's Opinion … V. Geppert James Quick Alan Minter Sam Kelley A. J. CARUBBI, JR. Staff Legal Assistant

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

Wright - Page 2 V-382 year as the County Board of School Trustees of the respective County may provide,” Seotion 5, the emergency clause In S, B. 252 … B. 375, and Alitlole 2688, V,C.S.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949

Hon.aeo. w. cox, M.D. 0plnlon Ro. v-891. … Cox, MI.D.,page 2 (V-891) not be deemed legally qm?Ufied.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1987

(3) Can the State Board of Education consolidate a school in Category V if they fail to file the necessary information prior to June 1, 1987? … Category V: These districts have failed to submit proper documentation or have special problems.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1999

See also University of California Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967). … See Board of Trustees v. State Board of Higher Education, Faulkner County Case No. CIV-95-201. Presumably, a similar argument could be formulated concerning the Social Work Licensing Board.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Apr 19, 2006

Holloway v. Sheats, 83 So. 508 , 509 (Fla. 1919). And see, State ex rel. Clyatt v. Hocker, 22 So. 721 (Fla. 1897). 2 And see Op. Att'y Gen. … Cf., Holley v. Adams, 238 So. 2d 401 , 407 (Fla. 1970) ("The acceptance of an incompatible office by one already holding office operates as a resignation of the first.").

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 2005

See Slay v. Louisiana Energy and Power Authority, 473 So.2d 51 (La. 1985). … See City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Agency, 439 So.2d 399 (La. 1983); Beaird-Poulan, Inc. v. Department of Highways, 362 F.Supp. 547 (W.D.La. 1973).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 2003

board" under A.C.A. § 6-67-102 (f)(1)? … The most helpful guidance in interpreting this language comes from a case in which the Arkansas Supreme Court construed similar statutory language: Brewer v. Howell, 227 Ark. 517 , 299 S.W.2d 851 (1957).

(2010)

95 Op. Att'y Gen. 95 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 2010

See Save Our Streets v. Mitchell , 357 Md. 237 , 248 , 743 A.2d 748 (2000); Cheeks v. Cedlair Corp ., 287 Md. 595 , 606-7 , 415 A.2d 255 (1980). … See County Commissioners for Montgomery County v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · May 17, 1990

v Hinman, 122 Misc.2d 531 , 534 [Sup Ct, Onondaga Co, 1984]). … The decisions of local boards have been set aside based upon a judicial finding of conflicts of interests of board members participating in the decisions ( ibid.; Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 32 [2d Dept

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

Spacek, Page 2, V-168 therein are accurate, and in nowise misleading. … Spacek, Page 4, V-168 “the concluding words of the section above quoted are very significant.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 2008

of the Parish of Rapides (iii) 33% to the City of Alexandria (iv) 5% to the City of Pineville *Page 2 (v) .5520% to the Town of Boyce (vi) .5232% to the Town of Cheneyville (vii) .7302% to the Town of Glenmora (viii) .7497% … Board."

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1998

Shaw v. Caddo Parish School Board , 347 So.2d 39 (La.App. 2 Cir, 1977) writ denied, 350 So.2d 676 (La. 1977). La. … In West Jefferson Levee District v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1993

Murray v. Palmgren , 231 Kan. 524 (1982). … Association Inc. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1992

The term "officers of the public schools" under Article 19, § 26 encompasses school board members. This conclusion is compelled by the Arkansas Supreme Court's ruling in Craighead County Bd. of Educ. v. … The fact that board members are county public school officers makes them no less `officers of the public schools.' Id. at 245. The court's reasoning in Craighead County Bd. of Educ. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 13, 1988

An ordinance of the City of Fort Smith was upheld by the Arkansas Supreme Court in the case of Bourland v. … The city attorney's representation of all municipal improvement districts in cities of the second class was also referenced in the case of Rowland v.