Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.44s
Kansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 1993
National Gypsum Co. v. Kansas Employment Security Board of Review , 244 Kan. 678 (1989). … The rule-making power of the board is restricted by law apart from K.S.A. 74-1406 that confers power to the board; the board cannot effectuate or make a rule that clearly offends legislative objective. Tew v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1995
Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tjw 1 See, e.g., Times Publishing Company v. Williams, 222 So.2d 470 , 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969). 2 Id. 3 See, e.g., McCoy Restaurants, Inc. v. … Fla. 84-54 (1984); Town of Palm Beach v. Gradison, 296 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1974), holding that advisory boards created by a board or commission subject to s. 286.011 to make recommendations are subject to the Sunshine Law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
of Librery Examiners, which Board is created in Art. 1682. … o- V-397) cluslon that It Is the non-delegable duty of the Com- missioners Court to conduct the menegement of the county llbrery.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1999
The failure of a county board of equalization member to take the oath of office at the required time, however, does not, in most cases, invalidate any action taken prior to swearing the oath. See e.g. , Pennington v. … In my opinion, therefore, the county board of equalization may meet in July for the purpose of "planning its work" under A.C.A. § 26-27-312 . See also, Gilmore v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 17, 1998
You request an opinion concerning this matter in light of Helms v. Cody , 856 F. … In Helms v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1995
Thomas v. State, 315 Ark. 79 , 864 S.W.2d 835 (1993). … Routh Wrecker Service, Inc. v. Wins, 312 Ark. 123 , 847 S.W.2d 707 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 1996
Special masters for value adjustment boards have been determined to be quasi-judicial officers. In Rodriguez v. … Holloway v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951
Edgar, page 3 (V-1256) Article II of House Bill 426 further provides as fol- lows: “Sec. 10. There is hereby established a Board LocaI Fund. … Edgar, page 5 (v-1256) Texas School for the ,Deaf Independent School Dis- trict.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1994
The County Board of Education? The local Board? Other? … Your fifth question is: V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1966
C-614 Director Texas National Guard Armory Board Re: Whether certain funds West Austin Station appropriated to the Austin, Texas 78703 Armory Board can be … V. Geppert, Chairman Pat Bailey Alan Minter Marvin Sentell Harry Gee APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. Wright -2987-
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Sep 2, 2010
election" in establishing the term of the successor appointed by the board? … Petersburg v. Carter , 39 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1949); Board of Trustees of the City Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers in the City of Tampa v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 1989
Ryan v Green, 58 N.Y. 295 (1874). In that case the Court held that two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the other or if there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices. … We note that this person will not be eligible for reappointment to the planning board should he remain a member of the town board. The town board appoints planning board members.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1984
Cohen v. Poelker, 520 S.W.2d 50 , 53-54 (Mo.Banc 1975). We also note that the Administrative Procedure Act applies to municipal agencies. Hunter v. Madden, 565 S.W.2d 456 , 458 (Mo.App. 1978). … Mills v. Federal Soldiers Home, 549 S.W.2d 862 , 865 (Mo.Banc 1977). Cf. Vorbeck v. McNeal, 560 S.W.2d 245 , 250 (Mo.App. 1977) (mere censure of public employee by employer did not create a contested case).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2007
In interpreting this provision this office followed the guidelines expressed in City of Port Allen v. … However, in The Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales, Louisiana, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1984
Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed, 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Edgerton v. International Company, 89 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1956); White v. … not authorize the board to enter into a lease with a private for profit corporation, see, Dobbs v.
Cited 0 timesPublished62 Op. Att'y Gen. 97 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · May 11, 1973
It is my opinion that the dismissal of the board members may be summary and need not be for cause. As you stated in your letter, the leading case in Wisconsin regarding dismissal of public officers is Ekern v. … A vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired term by a majority vote of the remaining members of the district board." In State ex rel. Pieritz v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 2000
SBN — Rules and Regulations, Chapter V-E-5. … Although at first blush these DOH regulations appear to conflict with Board of Nursing Regulation Chapter V-E-5, it is my opinion, as explained below, that the two do not conflict.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 1983
See also , Harvey v. Board of Public Instruction, 133 So. 868 (Fla. 1931); Buck v. McLean, 115 So.2d 764 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1959). … Cf ., Edwards v. State, supra, at 85; Pierce v. Division of Retirement, supra , at 672.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1978
Hopkins v. Special Road Bridge District No. 4, 74 So. 310 (Fla. 1917); Harvey v. Board of Public Instruction, supra ; State v. Ausley, 156 So. 909 (Fla. 1934); State v. Culbreath, 174 So.2d 422 (Fla. 1937); Gessner v. … Babcock v.
Cited 0 timesPublished92 Op. Att'y Gen. 65 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 2007
The Board may wish to consider adopting regulations or policies to guide agencies in structuring CMR contracts to meet these goals. I Background A. Project Delivery Method v. … Wilner, The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History (1984) at p. 117; see also ARA Health Services, Inc. v. Dep't of Public Safety and Correctional Serv. , 344 Md. 85 , 93 , 685 A.2d 435 (1996).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna