Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1994

The County Board of Education? The local Board? Other? … Your fifth question is: V.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1993

Rosenthal v. Orleans Parish School Bd., 214 So.2d 203 , (La.App. 4th Cir. 1968) application denied 215 So.2d 130 , 252 La. 963 . … Rosenthal v. Orleans Parish School Bd., supra.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1940

In discussingyour first question, Ve shall first analyze the opinion ih the aase of-Board of Trusteee of IndependentSchool Dlstz$ct of Houston v. Dow, 63 3. W. 1027, (writ of error denled). ! … A majority of said board shall constitutea quorum to do business, and they shall choose a president, secretary, treasurer and other necessary officers and committees By section 6 the board Is vested with

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1999

See also University of California Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967). … See Board of Trustees v. State Board of Higher Education, Faulkner County Case No. CIV-95-201. Presumably, a similar argument could be formulated concerning the Social Work Licensing Board.

Opinion No. (1987)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1987

In Arizona Board of Regents v. … In Marston v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 16, 1997

Despite your search, you have been unable to locate a medical geneticist who is able to serve in the remaining position on the Board. Applicable rules of statutory construction are set forth in Davey v. … City of Wichita v. 200 South Broadway , 253 Kan. 434 , 436 , 855 P.2d 956 (1993).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 2002

of Public Instruction of Broward County v. … Stat.); Mitchell v. Leon County School Board , 591 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Witgenstein v. School Board of Leon County , 347 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Ops. Att'y Gen.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 1985

Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed, 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Gardinier, Inc. v. … Hathaway v. Smith, 35 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1948). See also, Keating v. State ex rel.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 2002

In my opinion the two provisions quoted above (art. 5, § 9 and A.C.A. § 16-90-112 (b)) are applicable to the office of school board director. Cf. Martin v. … State ex rel, 240 Ark. 743 , 402 S.W.2d 121 (1966) (prosecuting attorney successfully ousted school board member who also improperly served on county board of education) and State ex rel. Robinson v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1977

State v. Tunnicliffe, 124 So. 279 (Fla. 1929); Gaulden v. Kirk, 47 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1950); and cf . State v. Jacksonville, 50 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1951). … See also , Florida Citrus Commission v. Golden Gift, Inc., 91 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1956); Peters v. Hansen, 157 So.2d 103 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1963); State v. Mitchell, 188 So.2d 684 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1966); Mourning v.

Opinion No. (1983)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1983

Nor can it be said that the Park Board of Commissioners is a de facto park board which, because of its assumption of the powers granted in Section 90.550 , properly enjoys the exercise of those powers. In Cherry v. … City of Republic v. Smith, 139 S.W.2d 929 (Mo. banc 1940), Fort Osage Drainage Dist. of Jackson County v. Jackson County, 275 S.W.2d 326 (Mo. 1955), and State ex rel. Hand v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 8, 1995

The School Board considered the recommendation on January 10, 1994 at which time it was approved. In Easterling v. … In Harris v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 9, 1999

select, by majority vote, two persons to serve on the board. … See, e.g. , Weir v. U.S., 339 F.2d 82 (8 th Cir. 1964) (the title of an act cannot overcome the meaning of plain and unambiguous words used in the body); and Quinney v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

V-54 Re: Local funds or institutional receipts, expenditure of for research purposes by Board … The governing boards of. . . including . . .

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1968

Vernon's Civil Statutes, and the current General Appropriation to the Veterans' Land Board, the Board is authorized to pay the costs of travel, lodging and meals of any officer or employee of the Board, State … V& truly yours, WFORU C. MARTIN General of Texas -1148- Hon.

Opinion No. (1999)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Aug 16, 1999

Wilkerson v. State of Colorado , 830 P.2d 1121 (Colo.Ct.App. 1992); Evert v. Ouren , 549 P.2d 791 (Colo.Ct.App. 1976); Francis v. Iowa Employment Security Commission , 250 Iowa 1300 , 98 N.W.2d 733 (1959); State ex rel. … Wilkerson v. State of Colorado , 830 P.2d 1121 (Colo.Ct.App. 1992).

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 2002

Co ., 263 Kan. 875 , 879 (1998). 6 Id . 7 Early Detection Center, Inc. v. Wilson , 248 Kan. 869 , 874 (1991). 8 City of Wichita v. … Partnership , 260 Kan. 154 , 163 (1996); First Page, Inc. v.

(1971)

60 Op. Att'y Gen. 276 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1971

office or to change the term of office of members of the village board." … Even where the offices are held by separate persons, the system of safeguards, including audit by the town board, is not a guarantee that defalcations cannot occur. See Grob v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 2005

of Louisiana v. … In Hall v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1976

You inquire whether the town board may grant the assessor a 90 day leave of absence; whether the town board may provide that such leave will be without pay; whether the town board may refuse to grant a leave of absence; whether … Board of Education, 93 N.Y. 1 [1883]; Fitzsimmons v. City of Brooklyn, 102 N.Y. 536 [1886]; Grieb v. City of Syracuse, 94 App. Div. 133 at p. 136 [1904]; Matter of Carroll v.