Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.70s
Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1986
Sailors v. Kent Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105 (1967). Student members are not elected to the Board of Regents. … The Board of Regents is essentially administrative. Board of Regents v. County of Lancaster, 48 N.W.2d 221 , 154 Neb. 398 (1951). Therefore the "one man, one vote" principle does not apply.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 2006
(See Irwin v. City of Manhattan Beach (1966) 65 Cal.2d 13 , 20-21 ; Martin v. Superior Court (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 1765 , 1768 ; 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 75 , 76 (1998).) … Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda. . . .
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1974
Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (Fla. 1969); Canney v. Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County 278 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1973). … Any gathering of two or more members of a board called for the purpose of discussing the business of the board comes within the scope of the Sunshine Law. City of Miami Beach v. Berns, 245 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1998
State Fair Association v. Townsend, 69 Ark. 215 , 63 S.W. 65 (1901). … See Board of Trustees for City of Little Rock, Ark. Police Pension Fund v. City of Little Rock, 295 Ark. 585 , 750 S.W.2d 950 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1996
The Nebraska Supreme Court has held that the constitutional power of the Nebraska Board of Pardons may not be usurped by the Legislature or by the Courts. In State v. … See, e.g. , Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v. Exon , 199 Neb. 146 , 149 (1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished65 Op. Att'y Gen. 288 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Nov 30, 1976
Ryan v. Pietrzykowski (1969), 42 Wis.2d 457 , 463 , 167 N.W.2d 242 . … Board of Representatives of Stamford (1961), 148 Conn. 33 , 166 A.2d 849 . Thus, in construing sec. 59.97, Stats. (1947), in Jefferson County v.
Cited 1 timesPublished89 Op. Att'y Gen. 18 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 2004
Reed v. President Commissioners, 226 Md. 229 , 242-43 , 172 A.2d 536 (1961); Benson v. Mellor, 152 Md. 481 , 137 A. 294 (1927); see also 79 Opinions of the Attorney General 438, 439-40 (1994). … Maryland Division of Labor Industry v. Triangle General Contractors, Inc., 366 Md. 407 , 422-23 , 784 A.2d 534 (2001).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2007
In interpreting this provision this office followed the guidelines expressed in City of Port Allen v. … However, in The Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales, Louisiana, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1985
Board of Vocational Nurse Examiners :Ls both a licensed vocational nurse and a regist,arad nurse. You ask whether she is eligible to serve on the board. … Railroad Com&sion of Texas v: Mller. 434 S.U.2d 670. 612, (Tex. 1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0434
Texas Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 2023
Dist. v. Standley, 280 S.W.2d 578, 583 (Tex. 1955) (quoting Dunbar v. Brazoria Cnty., 224 S.W.2d 738, 740 (Tex. Civ. App.—Galveston 1949, writ ref’d)). An emolument is “a pecuniary profit, gain or advantage.” … GA-0738 (2009) at 2). 2 See Tilley v. Rogers, 405 S.W.2d 220, 224 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1966, writ ref’d n r.e.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1990
Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry , 297 So.2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Florida Industrial Commission v. National Trucking Company , 107 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). 9 State ex rel. Greenberg v. … Florida Board of Dentistry, supra; State v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co ., 47 So. 969 (Fla. 1908). 10 St. Regis Paper Company v. State , 237 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Florida Industrial Commission v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1980
§ 296 , it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for a licensing agency to refuse to license an individual because of the individual's age but only if the individual is between the ages of 18 and 65 ( American Airlines v … 1978) app dsmd 46 N.Y.2d 939 (1979), found the decision of the Supreme Court in Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v Murgia ( 427 U.S. 307 [1976]) to be controlling.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1990
See generally, Collins v Manhattan Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., 62 N.Y.2d 361 (1984) (describing history and functions of public authorities). … We believe that statutorily-authorized disclosure for governmental purposes is not the type of disclosure that gives rise to civil liability (see Scott, Sardano Pomeranz v Records Access Officer of City of Syracuse, 65 N.Y
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1974
You have requested our opinion concerning the authority of the State Board of Education and the Coordinattng Board, Texas College and University System, to enter into an interagency agreement regarding the … General authority fey interagency agreements is granted by Art. 4413(32), V. T. C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1942
board of equalization..At the same meeting said council shall fix the time for the meeting of suoh board. … This canon of statutory construction is illustrated by the cese of Graham v. Lasater, 26 S. W. 472, holding that under Sayles Civil Statutes, Article 1517a.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1989
Gangale v. Khal, 14 Ohio App.3d 183 , 470 N.E.2d 454 (1984); and Braun v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen and Firemen Retirement System, City of Saginaw, 120 Mich. App. 296 , 328 N.W.2d 372 (1982). … Dempsey v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 549 F. Supp. 1334 (E.D.Ark. 1982); and Foote's Dixie Dandy v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1977
We believe that general laws governing expenditures by cities and counties would be applicable to such a board, e.g. V.T.C.S. art. 2368a. Compare Attorney General Opinion C-359 (1964) with V-1100 (1950). … SUMMARY The authority of a city-county recreation board to expend funds as well as the applicability of city charter provisions are matters to be determined by agreement between the city and county on whose behalf the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 2008
Wilkins v. Connors , 9 So. 7 , 8 (Fla. 1891). 2 See Blackburn v. … Holloway v. Sheats , 83 So. 508 , 509 (Fla. 1919). And see State ex rel. Clyatt v. Hocker , 22 So. 721 (Fla. 1897). 4 See Ops. Att'y Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2003
Holloway v. Sheats , 83 So. 508 , 509 (Fla. 1919). And see, State ex rel. Clyatt v. Hocker, 22 So. 721 (Fla. 1897). 3 See, State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority , 80 So.2d 337 , 338 (Fla. 1955); State ex rel. … Gibbs v. Gordon , 189 So. 437 (Fla. 1939); City of Riviera Beach v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMinnesota Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1998
Stat.§ 121.148, subd. 3(c) provides that: A school board ma v not proceed with construction if the state board of education upholds the commissioner·s negative review and comment or … :he �ar\ier la\V shall be consrrued :is continued in :.icti\·e npt!ration. Messrs. Roszak and Squires Page 10 Thus, after receipt of a petition, Minn. Stat. § 205A.05, subd.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna