Case law

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1990

Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry , 297 So.2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Florida Industrial Commission v. National Trucking Company , 107 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). 9 State ex rel. Greenberg v. … Florida Board of Dentistry, supra; State v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co ., 47 So. 969 (Fla. 1908). 10 St. Regis Paper Company v. State , 237 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Florida Industrial Commission v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1995

Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tjw 1 See, e.g., Times Publishing Company v. Williams, 222 So.2d 470 , 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969). 2 Id. 3 See, e.g., McCoy Restaurants, Inc. v. … Fla. 84-54 (1984); Town of Palm Beach v. Gradison, 296 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1974), holding that advisory boards created by a board or commission subject to s. 286.011 to make recommendations are subject to the Sunshine Law.

Opinion No. (2001)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 2001

Sermchief v. Gonzales , 660 S.W.2d 683 (Mo. 1983). This is particularly true when there is an apparent ambiguity in a statute. State ex rel. Rogers v. … Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Bowers , 965 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App. 1998).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1968

aside as would a like contract between two individuals, as such rules are set out in the case of Stevenson v. … Section 19 of Article 542l.mprovides certain prerequisites to the declaring of a forfeiture by the Veterans' Land Board. Automatic forfeiture is not specified, but forfeiture operates at the discretion of the Board.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 1992

The City of Winnfield's Fire and Police Civil Service Board (Board) is governed by LSA-R.S. 33:2531 et seq. … Massey v. Cunningham, 420 So.2d 1036 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1982), Delta Equipment and Construction Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co., 186 So.2d 454 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966).

Opinion No. (2001)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · May 17, 2001

Board. … California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians , 480 U.S. 202 (1987).

Opinion No. (1987)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1987

Lebeau v. Kelly, 697 S.W.2d 312 (Mo.App. 1985). … O'Flaherty v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 680 S.W.2d 153 (Mo. banc 1984).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 2001

Hargis (Sup.Ct.) 179 La. 623 ; 154 So. 628 State ex rel Floyd v. Hodges (Sup.Ct.) 165 La. 552 , 115 So. 747 Michell vs. La. State Board of Optometry Examiners (La.App. 3) 146 So.2d 863 (1962) Feinblum vs. La. … State Board of Optometry Examiner (La.App. 1) 97 So.2d 657 (1957) Fakier v. Picou (La.App. 1) 158 So. (2) 285 (1964) And the cases cited therein.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 2000

Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 719 S.W.2d 428 (1986). … See, e.g., Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. Priest, 325 Ark. 257 , 926 S.W.2d 432 (1996); Henson v. Fleet Mtg. Co., 319 Ark. 491 , 892 S.W.2d 250 (1995).

Opinion No. Oag 1-78, (1978)

67 Op. Att'y Gen. 1 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 1978

"(c) Transfer some or all functions, duties, responsibilities and privileges of any county office, department, committee, board, commission, position or employment to any other agency including a committee of the board." … In Geyso v. Cudahy , 34 Wis.2d 476 , 488 , 149 N.W.2d 611 (1967), it was held that the rule of cum onere does not extend to reimbursement for necessary expenses but that: ". . .

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1998

Shaw v. Caddo Parish School Board , 347 So.2d 39 (La.App. 2 Cir, 1977) writ denied, 350 So.2d 676 (La. 1977). La. … In West Jefferson Levee District v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 1983

See also , Harvey v. Board of Public Instruction, 133 So. 868 (Fla. 1931); Buck v. McLean, 115 So.2d 764 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1959). … Cf ., Edwards v. State, supra, at 85; Pierce v. Division of Retirement, supra , at 672.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1992

The term "officers of the public schools" under Article 19, § 26 encompasses school board members. This conclusion is compelled by the Arkansas Supreme Court's ruling in Craighead County Bd. of Educ. v. … The fact that board members are county public school officers makes them no less `officers of the public schools.' Id. at 245. The court's reasoning in Craighead County Bd. of Educ. v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1984

Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed, 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Edgerton v. International Company, 89 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1956); White v. … not authorize the board to enter into a lease with a private for profit corporation, see, Dobbs v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Feb 16, 1977

In Robin v. … (See, e.g., Good Humor Corp . v. City of New York, 290 N.Y. 312 , 316-317 ; People v. Lewis, 295 N.Y. 42 , 51 ; Wholesale Laundry Bd. of Trade v. City of New York, 17 A.D.2d 327 , 330 , affd. 12 N.Y.2d 998 ; Kim v.

Opinion No. (1999)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1999

In Parriott v. … The court, in Catania v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1979

Martin v. Michell, 188 So.2d 684 (4 D.C.A. Fla., 1966), cert. discharged , 192 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1966); Peters v. Hansen, 157 So.2d 103 (2 D.C.A. Fla, 1969); cf . Southern Utilities Co. v. … Thus, the board possesses such implied powers as are necessary to carry out its statutorily imposed duties. See Molwin Investment Co. v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1993

Murray v. Palmgren , 231 Kan. 524 (1982). … Association Inc. v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1962

Church v. … V. Geppert, Chairman J. C.

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1983

officer or agency to employ an attorney or contract for legal services (see Seif v City of Long Beach, 286 N.Y. 382 [1941]; and Cahn v Town of Huntington, 29 N.Y.2d 451 [1972]). … ( Seif v City of Long Beach, supra, pp 386-387 ).