Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.49s
64 Op. Att'y Gen. 18 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Apr 18, 1975
See Abdella v. Abdella (1954), 268 Wis. 127 , 130 , 66 N.W.2d 689 , and State ex rel. Badtke v. School Board (1957), 1 Wis.2d 208 , 214 , 83 N.W.2d 724 . … No. 9 v. WERB (1967), 35 Wis.2d 540 , 555-558 , 151 N.W.2d 617 , and Joint School District No. 8. v. Wis. E.R. Board (1967), 37 Wis.2d 483 , 494 , 155 N.W.2d 78 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 5, 2010
Admin. v. Samuhel , 51 Ark. App. 76 , 909 S.W.2d 656 (1995). … See Barnes, et al. v. Alcohol Beverage Control Board, et al. , No. CA 09-39 (Ark. App. filed Jan. 13, 2009). Deputy Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker prepared the foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1998
See, e.g. , Davis v. Holt, 304 Ark. 619 , 804 S.W.2d 362 (1991). … For example, in Maddox v. State, 220 Ark. 762 , 249 S.W.2d 972 (1952), it was stated as follows: A public officer ordinarily exercises some part of the State's sovereign power.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1966
State Board of ledical Examiners. … V. Geppert, Chairman Pat Bailey H. Grady Chandler Phillip Crawford Ben Harrison APPROVED FOR TRE ATTORREY GENERAL By: T. B. Wright -2941-
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949
Kelly opinion RO. v-956. … In its opln$on ao- v-929, this OffIC8 held that the State Board of Control Is the appointing authority as to the superintendents of th8 Texas Sohobl for th8 Blind and the Texas School for the Deaf.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1993
Wallace v. Jaffree (1985) 472 U.S. 38, 50. The Establishment Clause was originally intended to "erect a wall of separation between church and state." Everson v. Board of Education (1947) 330 U.S. 1, 16. … Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York v. Fox (1989) 492 U.S. 469, 477. It, therefore, may be subject to greater government regulation than non-commercial speech. City of Cincinnati v.
Cited 0 timesPublished94 Op. Att'y Gen. 177 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Nov 4, 2009
Once the local board prepares its proposed annual budget, it is subject to the county budget process and procedures. Chesapeake Charter, Inc. v. … Board of Education of Anne Arundel County , 280 Md. 634 , 643-651 , 374 A.2d 1155 (1977), Board of Education of Montgomery County v. Montgomery County , 237 Md. 191 , 205 A.2d 202 (1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 3, 2006
. § 6-13-620 ] as allowing school boards wide latitude in governing their districts. See, e.g., Safferstone v. Tucker, 235 Ark. 70 , 72 , 357 S.W.2d 3 , 4 (1962); Isgrig v. Srygley, 210 Ark. 580 , 197 S.W.2d 39 (1946). … See also Springdale Board of Education v. Bowman, 294 Ark. 66 , 69 , 740 S.W.2d 909 , 910 (1987); Leola School District v. McMahan, 289 Ark. 496 , 498 , 712 S.W.2d 903 , 905 (1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1978
See also Turk v. … Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed , 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Gessner v. Del-Air Corporation, 17 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1944).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1976
Town of Palm Beach v. … City of Miami Beach v. Berns, supra; Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (Fla. 1969); also see AGO 074-22. AS TO QUESTION 2: Your second question is answered in the negative.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1966
Section 10 specifically states: "All expenditures and contracts authorized by the Commission or Operating Board shall be made, let, supervised and expended by the Board of Control of the State of … V. Geppert, Chairman John Reeves Gordon Houser Harold Kennedy APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. Wright -2999-
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 1981
The rules of the state board of education are presumptively valid and must be given effect until judicially or legislatively determined otherwise. Cf . Florida Citrus Commission v. … Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed , 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Gessner v. Del-Air Corporation, 17 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1944).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 2001
Smith Assistant Attorney General CJS:JLM:RDS:jm 1 K.S.A. 82a-615 ; 82a-617. 2 See Wiggins v. Housing Authority of Kansas City , 22 Kan. App. 2d 367 , 369 (1996). 3 Madden v. … City of Lenexa , 239 Kan. 397 , 400 (1986). 4 Hobart v. Board of Education, U.S.D. No. 309 , 230 Kan. 375 , 383 (1981). 5 K.S.A. 82a-626 (emphasis added).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 2010
In the case of Spain v. … Martin Parish Police Jury v. Iberville Parish Police Jury , 212 La. 886 , 33 So.2d 671 , 676 (1947); State v. Fontenot , 112 La. 628 , 36 So. 630 , 634 (1904).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 1982
The same are hereinafter discussed. (1) Reasons for Doubt The cases of Board of Regents v. Exon, supra , and Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Exon, supra , 199 Neb. at 149 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 2002
Matter of Gryziec v. Zweibel , 74 A.D.2d 9 , 14 (4th Dep't 1980); Matter of Muscatello v. New York State Crime Victims Board , 289 A.D.2d 789 (3d Dep't 2001). … The Board may exercise its discretion in each instance to grant or deny rehabilitative services funds, provided that its decision is supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g. Ortiz v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1978
A.D.2d 479 , modified on other ground, 15 N.Y.2d 927 [1965]; Matter of Roher v Dinkins, 32 N.Y.2d 180 [1973]). … order a special election in the event the town board fails to appoint ( Matter of Roher v Dinkins, supra ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 2009
K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 74-8735 creates the lottery gaming facility review board (Board). … Leek v. Theis , 217 Kan. 784 , 811 (1975); Riddle v. City of Ottawa , 12 Kan.App.2d 714 , 717 (1988), citing Stoldt v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1995
Attorney General Opinion No. 94-105 and Bruns v. Kansas Board of Technical Professions are related in that both deal with a regulatory board's authority to interpret legislation. … The Kansas Supreme Court has long given judicial deference to an administrative board's interpretation of a statute that it enforces. Blue v. McBride , 252 Kan. 894 , 923 (1993); Kansas Board of Regents v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1983
In Gardner v. … Com'n for Co. of Wayne v. Board of Sup'rs. , 384 Mich. 363 , 184 N.W.2d 201 (1971).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna