Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.53s
92 Op. Att'y Gen. 137 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 2007
County Funding of Local Schools It is well established under Maryland law that county boards of education are State agencies. See Chesapeake Charter, Inc. v. … Financial Audit v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 2004
McComas Wichita, Kansas 67217 Dear Representative Swenson: You request our opinion regarding the impact of the Kansas Supreme Court case Board of County Commissioners of the County of Lincoln, Kansas v. … See also State Dept. of Admin v. PERB , 257 Kan. 275 , 284 (1995). 11 See also City of Wichita v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 2002
The case, however, provides guidance in determining whether members of the Board of INK may delegate their duty to attend Board meetings. 10 Detroit Edison Co. v. … January 25, 2002); Matjasich v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1995
Cf ., Matter of MacDonald v Ordway , 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 (1916); Matter of Haller v Carlson , supra , p 830. … The board's function is to analyze the environmental impact of projects referred to them by the planning board and to make recommendations to the planning board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 1978
See also art. 6701d, § 27(a)(5); but see Penal Code § 1.08 ; Attorney General Opinion V-429 (1947) (county possesses no general police power to regulate traffic). … Opinions H-1052 (1977) (assessment of road tax not dependent on outstanding bond indebtedness); H-990 (1977) (county may not charge tolls for ferry); WW-1482 (1962) (county may not assess fees on motorboats using county park); V-
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1965
The governing boards may require the depository so designated and selected to pay Interest on deposits at a rate to be agreed upon by said depositoriesand said boards. … V. Geppert, Chairman John Banks James Strock Wayne Rodgers Howard Fender APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. Wright
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1993
The Fifth Circuit rejected the board's attempt to rely on Cook v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 568 (1968). Citing Tinker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · May 3, 2000
(Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board (1989) 49 Cal.3d 575 , 591 ; 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 218 , 220-221 (1998).) … In TRIM, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1995
State v. Williamson , 253 Kan. 163 , 166 (1993), quoting State v. Dedman , 230 Kan. 793 , 797 (1982). See also Leek v. Theis , 217 Kan. 784 , 804 (1975). … State ex rel. v. State Board of Education , 215 Kan. 551 , 554 (1974); Kan. Const., art. 6 , sec. 2 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 2000
Serv. v. Delta-Hills Health Sys. Inc., 285 Ark. 397 , 687 S.W.2d 840 (1985). There, a board took action by way of a meeting that violated the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act. … Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn., 193 Ark. 1023 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937); State ex rel Murphy v. Townsend, 72 Ark. 180 (1904). Accord, Ops. Att'y Gen. Nos. 93-276 ; 88-083.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 2005
You did not indicate that the Lafayette Parish School Board ("School Board") is being compensated for its transportation services; therefore, we are answering your questions as though the School Board is providing such transportation … State v. Walker, 775 So.2d 663 (La.App 1 st Cir. 2000); La. Const. Art. V § 26 (B); La. R.S. 16:1 ; La. C.Cr.P. Art. 61 . A determination as to whether the requisite elements of La.
Cited 0 timesPublished62 Op. Att'y Gen. 312 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1973
Pruitt v. State (1962), 16 Wis.2d 169 , 114 N.W.2d 148 . Conflicts between statutes are not favored and will not be held to exist if they may otherwise be reasonably construed. Raisanen v. … Immega v. Elkhorn (1948), 253 Wis. 282 , 288 , 34 N.W.2d 101 . Nevertheless, it is probable that public funds are available for investment in most municipalities.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1974
Boff: Citing Article 4566-l. 10 (10); V. T. C. … Article 4566-1.10, V. T. C. S., li.ets the grounds upon which the Board may refuse to license an applicant or revoke the license of a licenree.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 1992
Adkins v. Kalter, supra ; Little Rock Fort Smith R. Co. v. Howell, 31 Ark. 119 (1876); and Bartlett v. Crawford, 36 Ark. 637 (1880). … Accordingly, the provision would, in my opinion, apply to the State Hospital Board. See Harris v. Emmerling, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Jan 26, 2000
Oaths Affirmations s. 4. 2 See, Markey v. State , 37 So. 53 (Fla. 1904); Crockett v. Cassels, 116 So. 865 (Fla. 1928). 3 116 So. 865 , 866 (Fla. 1928). 4 Collins v. … State , 465 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), citing Markey v. State , 37 So. 53 (Fla. 1904), and Youngker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951
V-1170 Re: Authority of the Board to place permanent improve- ments upon land held by the State subject to mineral re- … Cox - Page 8 - V-1170 Is a matter upon which we exprecreno opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Dec 7, 2001
We entertain little doubt that a Board member holds a public office. (See People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636 , 639-640 .) … (See People v. Rodgers (1897) 118 Cal. 393 , 397 .) 1 Such a claim may be brought in an action other than quo warranto, where the issue of entitlement to office is only incidentally involved. (Klose v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1986
v Hinman, 122 Misc.2d 531 , 534 [Sup Ct, Onondaga Co, 1984]). … The decisions of local boards have been set aside based upon a judicial finding of conflicts of interest of board members participating in the decisions ( ibid.; Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 320 [2d Dept
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 2004
the fire and police civil service board. … families, parent groups and parent self-help groups, youth development, delinquency prevention and treatment, neglected or dependent children, the quality of juvenile justice, education, and social services for children; (V)
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 2008
The case of Grant v. … Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. , 392 So.2d 398 (La. 1980); Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans , 2005-979 (La. 4/4/06), 925 So.2d 1202 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna