Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.75s
Florida Attorney General Reports · May 6, 2009
Fla. 93-91 (1993) and 88-62 (1988). 2 See Alsop v. … However, if a code enforcement board finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature, it may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 per violation." 5 Section 162.09 (3), Fla. Stat. 6 Reynolds v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 2007
Golden v. Clark , 76 N.Y.2d 618 , 626-27 (1990). … Roth v. Cuevas , 158 Misc. 2d at 250 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1957
V-803, dated April 4, ‘1949, discussed at great length the fees that need not be paid to the Board of Water Engineers by public agencies - . such as the Brazes River Authority, … V-803, approved A,p ril 4, 1949, addressed to the Board of Water Engineers, reviews all prior opinions and withdraws Opinion No. O-4304 and Opinion No.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 2001
Stat. 8 See, Buckner v. School Board of Glades County, Florida , 718 So.2d 862 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Von Stephens v. … to reject such nominations). 9 See, Von Stephens v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 2000
Serv. v. Delta-Hills Health Sys. Inc., 285 Ark. 397 , 687 S.W.2d 840 (1985), that citizens may petition the court for a declaratory judgment that the actions taken at a meeting held in violation of the Act are invalid. … Aloha Pools Spas V. Employer's Ins., 342 Ark. ___ , ___ S.W.3d ___ (October 18, 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · May 7, 2001
Voth Assistant Attorney General CJS:JLM:DMV:jm 1 K.S.A. 12-744 (b). 2 56 Am.Jur.2d, Municipal Corporations, § 338. 3 See McCarthy v. City of Leawood, Kansas , 257 Kan. 566 (1995); Moore v. … See also Board of Trego County Comm'rs v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 2003
Code, §§ 31450 - 31898 ) 1 to provide for retirement benefits for county employees. ( See Traub v. Board of Retirement (1983) 34 Cal.3d 793 ; 80 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 11 (1997); 79 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 95 (1996).) … While an alternate on a board may have certain rights and meet certain qualifications (see, e.g., Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation etc.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 2011
In Ardoin v. … Board of Trustees , 94-1024 (La.App. 1 Cir. 4/7/95) , 653 So.2d 1337 , whereas in State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 2002
Culpepper v. Board of Chiropractic Exam. 343 Ark. 467 , 36 S.W.3d 335 (2001); Cyphers v. United Parcel Service. 68 Ark. App. 62 , 3 S.W.3d 698 (1999); Little Rock Cleaning Sys. Inc. v. … Weiss. 326 Ark. 1007 , 935 S.W.2d 268 (1996); Douglass v. Dynamic Enters., Inc. 315 Ark. 575 , 869 S.W.2d 14 (1994). This interpretation is bolstered by its practical application.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1943
tiembership in such a board is not named in the exceptions. … In the recent cases of Carpenter v. Sheppard, 1.46 9. #. (2) 662, Spears 0. Sheppard, 160 S. PI.(2) 769, and Cramer v. Sheppard, 167 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · May 21, 2002
In McQuinn v. Douglas County School Dist. … Added support for the belief that the Board is exercising a judicial function is found in City of Auburn v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 27, 2001
K. v. … Kansas Board of Examiners in Optometry , 268 Kan. 739 (2000), quoting Anderson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1944
Cal- veston County V, Gresh-s, 220 8. IF.560; Boydston V. Rockwell CO*, 24 S. It’. 272. … Williams V. Fura Oil Company, 78 S. W. (2d) 929. Honorable 9. C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 2000
City of San Diego (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1035 , 1050 ; Thurston v. Southern Cal. Public Power Authority (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 236 , 238 ; People v. Shepherd (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 334 , 337 ; County of San Joaquin v. … (See Harbach v. El Pueblo de Los Angeles etc. com. (1971) 14 Cal.3d 828 , 834 [joint powers agency board member may exercise discretion in voting similar to a city council member].)
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 2003
Board of Elementary and Secondary Education v. Nix , 347 So.2d 147 , 150 (1997). … Board of Elementary and Secondary Bd. v. Nix, at 154.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
v-403 Chairman, State Board of Plumbing Examiners, Rer Authority of State Austin, Texas Board of Plumbing … W o 375; Brady v. Brooks, 99 Tex. 36b, 89 S.
Cited 0 timesPublished85 Op. Att'y Gen. 167 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · May 24, 2000
McCarthy v. Board of Education, 280 Md. 634 , 374 A.2d 1135 (1977); Board of Education v. Montgomery County, 237 Md. 191 , 205 A.2d 202 (1964). … Notably, in Board of Education v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 15, 2008
Jefferson Parish School Board v. City Park Improvement Association , 345 So.2d 597 (La.App. 4 th Cir. 1977). … Guste v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 2003
In State v. … State v. Alfonso , 753 So.2d 156 (La. 1999). The connection between the Board's authority to sell or market software and the powers listed under LA R.S. 37:760 , is debatable and would be for the courts to decide.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1993
The Fifth Circuit rejected the board's attempt to rely on Cook v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 568 (1968). Citing Tinker v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna