Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 2000

Southwestern Bell Tel. v. Ar. Pub. Ser. , 69 Ark. App. 323 , ___ S.W.3d ___ (2000); Southwestern Bell v. Ar. Pub. Ser. , 68 Ark. App. 148 , 5 S.W.3d 484 (1999); ATT Comm. v. Arkansas Pub. Ser. Comm. , 67 Ark. … Bd. v. Bolding, 324 Ark. 238 , 920 S.W.2d 825 (1996); Douglass v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. , 315 Ark. 575 , 869 S.W.2d 14 (1994); Junction City Sch. Dist. v. Alphin, 313 Ark. 456 , 855 S.W.2d 316 (1993); Brimer v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0451

Texas Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 2023

Co. v. … City of Waco v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1958

Section 14~ of Article V of House Bill 133, Acts of the 55th Legislature, ,RegularSession, Chapter 385, p. 11&O, same being the current Biennial Appropriation Act, provides i.r! … V. Geppert.

Opinion No. (1984)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 1984

Ebke v. … Belker v. Board of Educational Lands and Funds , 184 Neb. 621 , 171 N.W.2d 156 (1969).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2011

occurring on the board during any term will be filled by the village commission. 5 However, once the board is appointed, the foundation's board exercises full control over the operations of the foundation. 6 The board appoints … Berns , 245 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1971). 25 See Board of Public Instruction Of Broward County v. Doran , 224 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 1969); Wood v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 2006

court in Young v. … Code art. 13 . 12 See State v. BP Exploration Oil, Inc., 96-0716 (La. 1/14/97), 686 So.2d 823 , 828 ; Board of Trustees of State Employees Group Benefits Program v. St.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1976

And to the same effect are the following authorities: Minot v. Inhabitants of West Roxbury * * *; Anthony v. Adams ( 1 Met. 284 ); Parsons v. Inhabitants of Goshen ( 11 Pick. 396 ); Lemnon v. … City of Newton ( 134 Mass. 476 ); Cornell v. Town of Guilford ( 1 Denio, 510 ); Board of Supervisors v. Ellis, ( 59 N Y 620 )."

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951

board, as the case may be." … Art. 8265a, Sec. 5, V.C.S* The Board of Navigation and Canal Com- missioners may, by resolution, adopt the pro- visions of Section 18-a of Article 8263e, V.

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1987

school students does not violate the separation of church and State set forth in the Establishment Clause ( Board of Education v Allen, 392 U.S. 236 [1968]; Everson v Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 [1947]). … To the extent a school district makes these services available, it must make them available on an equal basis to all students (see, Finkel v New York City Board of Education, 474 F.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1981

This power is discretionary, which means that the board of trustees also may abolish an established planning board ( Russell Oaks, Inc. v Planing Bd. of Incorporated Village of Russell Gardens, 28 A.D.2d 569 [2d Dept, 1967 … Having exercised its discretion to establish a planning board and confer powers upon it, a governing body may exercise its discretion to abolish the board or withdraw powers from it (see Russell Oaks, Inc. v Planning Bd.

Opinion No. (2001)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 2001

Hamilton v. Foster, 155 Neb. 89 , 50 N.W.2d 542 (1951); State ex rel. Comstock v. Stewart, 52 Neb. 243 , 71 N.W. 998 (1897); Douglas County v. Timme, 32 Neb. 272 , 49 N.W. 266 (1891). … Stewart, 52 Neb at 255 , 71 N.W. at 1002 , 1003 (quoting Douglas County v. Timme, 32 Neb. at 275 , 49 N.W. 267 ). In the present instance, art.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1952

V-3.547 Executive-Director. Board for Texas State Iios-Re: Necessity for business pitala'. … Cox, page 5 (V-1547) SUMMARY !l!

Opinion No. (1991)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1991

This conclusion was based on the case Krug v. … Following the view in Braddy v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Sep 15, 1997

In Neu v. … In Michel v.

Opinion No. (1979)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Dec 7, 1979

See Speer v. Kratzenstein, 143 Neb. 300 , 9 N.W.2d 306 ; Bass v. County of Saline, 171 Neb. 538 , 106 N.W.2d 860 . … Once again a similar result occurred in Municipal University of Omaha v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1948

The Board of Pardons and Paroles requests an opinion from the Attorney General of Texas as to  - r The Board of Pardons and Paroles - Page 3 (v-561) whether or not we would have a right … % The Board of Pardons and Paroles - Page 4 '(v-561) - The Board of Pardons and Parolks has jur-

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1995

Arkansas courts have long interpreted the above-quoted statutory provision as allowing school boards wide latitude in formulating the rules and policies that govern their school systems. See, e.g., Safferstone v. … Tucker, 235 Ark. 70 , 72 , 357 S.W.2d 3 , 4 (1962); Isgrig v. Srygley, 210 Ark. 580 , 197 S.W.2d 37 (1946). See also Springdale Board of Education v.

Opinion No. (2001)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 2001

The Nebraska Supreme Court has held that the constitutional power of the Nebraska Board of Pardons may not be usurped by the Legislature or by the courts. In State v. … The Laura , 114 U.S. 411 , 414 (1884); Schick v. Reed , 419 U.S. 256 , 266 (1974).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 2008

See McKinney v. Robbins , 319 Ark. 596 , 892 S.W.2d 502 . … Sullivan v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1999

Bd. v. Bolding, 324 Ark. 238 , 920 S.W.2d 825 (1996); Douglass v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc., 315 Ark. 575 , 869 S.W.2d 14 (1994); Junction City Sch. Dist. v. Alphin, 313 Ark. 456 , 855 S.W.2d 316 (1993); Brimer v. … See Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997); Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 , 631 (1996); Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957 (1982); Craft v. City of Fort Smith, 335 Ark. 417 , 984 S.W.2d 22 (1998); Medlock v.