Case law

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1963

In the case of Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. … State v. Robinson (Tex.Sup.), 30 S.W.2d 297."

(1974)

63 Op. Att'y Gen. 16 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 1974

No. 9 v. WERB (1967), 35 Wis.2d 540 , 151 N.W.2d 617 and Joint School District No. 8 v. Wisconsin E. R. Board (1967), 37 Wis.2d 483 155 N.W.2d 78 . … Board of Education v. WERC (1971), 52 Wis.2d 625 , 640 , 191 N.W.2d 242 .

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1987

Attorney General Opinion JM-257 (1984) (citing Tri-City Fresh Water Supply District No. 2 of Earris County v. Mann. 142 S.W.Zd 945, 940 (Tex. 1940); Lower Nueces River Water Supply %rict v. … V. $18(b); Canales v. Laughlin, 214 S.W.Zd 451. 453 (Tex. 1948).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2004

the 1998 revision to Article V , Florida Constitution, a question has been raised regarding the continuance of the library board. 4 You state that the filing fee created to establish and maintain the law library will be … V , Fla.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1995

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 3. 95-513  Cal.3d 711, 724, quoting Moyer v. … Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 495; Amador Valley Joint Union School District v. State Board of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 245-246.)

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951

v-1217 Re: Authority of the Board of Plumbing Examiners to adopt a rule that failure of plumb- ers to comply with city … Liceos'esissued by the Board shall be valid throughout the state, but shall not be assignable or  ,’ J Hon. C. E. Belk, page 3 (V-1217) transferable.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 2008

Lyon v. Bd. of Supervisors of the County of Steuben , 115 A.D. 193 (4 th Dep't 1906). The Board of Elections is authorized to establish as many fixed branch offices as it deems necessary. Election Law § 3-214 (2). … *Page 3 Stanton v. Bd. of Supervisors of the County of Essex , 191 N.Y. 428 (1908).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1988

V, 54 (a), at 1082. This $75 limit on food and lodging expenses conflicts with the "actual travel expenses" allowed by the board's enabling act and gives rise to the current controversy. … Because section 4(l) of article V of the current Appropriations Act provides for per diem *[aIs authorized by Section 2 of article 6813f,' it does not apply to per diem established by other statutes,

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1975

V. T. C. S., art. 4477-5, sec. 2.13. … If the photographs are taken by an employee or agent of the board they will be confidential only insofar as they are excepted from disclosure under the Open Records Act. V. T. C. S., art. 6252-17a.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 2008

Morrison v. Oshman Sporting Goods Co. , 275 Kan. 763 , 768 (2003). 21 State v. Yrigolla , 38 Kan.App.2d 1029 , 1034 (2008). … Zeit , 2008 WL 900658 (Kan.App. 2008). 28 State v. Rupnick , 280 Kan. 720 , 735 (2005). 29 State v. Busse , 252 Kan. 695 , 699 (1993). 30 K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 74-8734 (h)(10).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 2008

See , e.g. , Kyle v. State , 312 Ark. 274 , 849 S.W.2d 935 (1993). Third, Act 274 is the more specific statute. See , e.g., Donoho v. … position as established by the local board of directors.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1974

The Division of Parole Supervision is created by the provisions of Article 42.12, Sets. 26 - 32, V. T. C. C. P. … V. T.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

Carl Gilliland - Page 2 (V-295) Under these facts, you have asked whether it was necessary for the County School Board of Trus- tees of both counties to enter their joint order call- ing the election … Weaver v. ‘Board of Trus- tees or Wilson I. US. D., 184 5.’ W. (2d) 864; Trio 1.S.D. v. sabinal I.&D., 192 9. W. (26) 899; Worth C.S.D. v. Live Oak County Board, 199 5. W. (2d) 764. It follows  r Eon.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Jul 1, 2004

See , e.g. , Matter of Karedes v. Colella , 100 N.Y.2d 45 (2003); Morin v. Foster , 45 N.Y.2d 287 (1978); Matter of Harrison Cent. Sch. Dist. v. … Highlands v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1958

See also Industrial Accident Board v. … Brown, Jr. Richard B, Stone Jack Goodman REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: W. V. Geppert

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1941

aawaemsnts. .15eheld in IEUler v, Vsncre,107 Tex+ a, lrnS.W* 739, ‘an indspendsnf s&601 CUetrlot WhOU taxes are oolleoted by oounty otrloials need not has6 a dietrial;board of equaliestion.~ Xt … *Thor;lsht ii~rumU tD0hav4 in u8u~t rnleu8U'~ u l8lu 4quJJ in1 WA*; on Tazation (Se.M.) p* 991, ‘is on0 0fwUs.h an own&r shouldnotba danied.~ Quoting, as amplieabla* fma the 4440 of Xlller v.

(2008)

93 Op. Att'y Gen. 47 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 2008

Powell v. State , 179 Md. 399 , 405 , 18 A.2d 587 (1941). … Bouse v. Hutzler , 180 Md. 682 , 687 , 26 A.2d 767 (1942); see also Comptroller v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 11, 2008

*Page 5 Generally, substantive provisions, as opposed to procedural provisions, must be construed prospectively and not retroactively, Procell v. … Richmond , 899 So.2d. 535 (La. 2005); Russell v. Goldsby , 780 So.2d 1048 (La. 2000).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 14, 2007

Relying on City of Port Allen v. La. … VII, § 14 in Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales v. All Taxpayers, et al. 2005-2298 (La. 09/06/06), 938 So.2d. 11 ( Cabela).

Opinion No. Oag 16-85, (1985)

74 Op. Att'y Gen. 73 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1985

Sundby v. Adamany , 71 Wis.2d 118 , 237 N.W.2d 910 (1976); State ex rel. Kleczka v. Conta , 82 Wis.2d 679 , 264 N.W.2d 539 (1978). *Page 75 1. … The board cannot make tax levies for future years or create a sinking fund. Immega v. Elkhorn , 253 Wis. 282 , 34 N.W.2d 101 (1948).