Case law

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Apr 7, 1988

V, § 4(a), at 1082. This $75 limit on food and lodging expenses conflicts with the `actual travel expenses' allowed by the board's enabling act and gives rise to the current controversy. … Because section 4(l) of article V of the current Appropriations Act provides for per diem `[a]s authorized by Section 2 of article 6813f,' it does not apply to per diem established by other statutes, i.e., those enacted after

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 2006

The board may lawfully delegate ministerial, administrative, or executive powers to a committee. See generally Jonesboro v. Montague, 143 Ark. 13 , 219 S.W. 309 (1920). … See also City of Harrison v.

Opinion No. Oag 11-78, (1978)

67 Op. Att'y Gen. 47 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1978

See Colburn v. Ozaukee County , 39 Wis.2d 231 , 159 N.W.2d 33 (1968), as to distinction between notice of injury and notice of claim statutes. … The court stated that the contractor's claim had to be submitted to the county board as a condition precedent to suit. Joyce v. Sauk County , 206 Wis. 202 , 239 N.W. 439 (1931).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1948

Avery, Page 3 (v-651) Board. … (Art. 734b, V. P. C.)

(2007)

92 Op. Att'y Gen. 148 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2007

See Board of Trustees of Howard Community College v. John K Ruff, Inc. , 278 Md. 580 , 586-88 , 366 A.2d 360 , 364 (1976) (sovereign immunity); see also Davis v. … Brohawn Bros. v. Board , 269 Md. 169 , 172 , 304 A.2d 819 , 823 (1973) (sovereign immunity) and Prince George's County v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 2008

Johnson v. Taggart , 92 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1957), Chaffee v. Miami Transfer Company, Inc. , 288 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1974), Sarasota Herald-Tribune Co. v. … State v.

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1983

Article V, § 2 of the State Constitution provides that "[t]here shall be not more than twenty civil departments in the state government, including those referred to in this Constitution" (emphasis provided). … (see Historical Note to N Y Const, Art V , § 2 [McKinney's, 1969]). Article V, § 4 of the Constitution designates the heads of certain of these departments.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 2002

See Elmore v. Burke, 337 Ark. 235 , 987 S.W.2d 730 (1999); Nance v. Williams, 263 Ark. 237 , 564 S.W.2d 212 (1978); Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. … For example, in Baxter County Newspapers, Inc. v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949

V-853. … V-184 followed the holding in Attorney General’s Opinion No.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 10, 2002

The Honorable Claud V. … No. 14 v. Massey, 315 Ark. 163 , 866 S.W.2d 369 (1993). Assistant Attorney General Suzanne Antley prepared the foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve. Sincerely, MARK PRYOR Attorney General

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 23, 1998

See, e.g., Sparling v. Refunding Board, 189 Ark. 189 , 71 S.W.2d 182 (1934). … Accord Bruce v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2000

(2) Does the Board have the authority to conditionally approve contracts, subject to further review and approval by the Board? … Hagar v. State, 341 Ark. ___ , ___ S.W.3d ___ (June 15, 2000).

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 99OAG242

Maryland Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 2014

Union v. … See Walzer v. Osborne, 395 Md. 563, 573-74 (2006). As the Court of Appeals declared in Gleaton v.

(1972)

61 Op. Att'y Gen. 403 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Oct 25, 1972

Schultz v. Milwaukee County (1947), 250 Wis. 18 , 22 , 26 N.W.2d 260 . … They protected him against being deprived of the salary incident to his office during the term for which he was elected. * * *" In Feavel v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 2002

Ryan v. Green , 58 N.Y. 295 , 304-05 (1874); O'Malley v. Macejka , 44 N.Y.2d 530 , 535 (1978); Matter of Dupras v. County of Clinton , 213 A.D.2d 952 , 953 (3d Dep't 1995). … Ryan v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 2007

Const., Art. 15 , § 1 . 10 K.S.A. 25-2001 et seq . 11 See Avery v. Midland County , 390 U.S. 474 , 88 S.Ct. 1114 , 20 L.Ed.2d 45 (1968); Reynolds v. … State Board of Healing Arts v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1995

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 3. 95-513  Cal.3d 711, 724, quoting Moyer v. … Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 495; Amador Valley Joint Union School District v. State Board of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 245-246.)

(2006)

91 Op. Att'y Gen. 145 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 2006

The Court of Appeals has held that a county board of education "is not part of the executive branch of the county government nor an agency under its control." Board of Education v. … See also Chesapeake Charter, Inc. v. Anne Arundel County Bd. Of Educ., 358 Md. 129 , 136-37 , 747 A.2d 625 (2000) (summarizing the status of a local board); Board of Education of Prince George's County v.

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 98 OAG 114

Maryland Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2013

NLRB v. … State v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1963

In the case of Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. … State v. Robinson (Tex.Sup.), 30 S.W.2d 297."