Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSAG

10,000+ results

0.36s

  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 2009

    Bernard Library Board of Control (Library Board). … Co. , 94-2065, p. 8 (La. 2/20/95), 650 So.2d 1148 , 1153 ; quoting Smith v. Flourney , 115 So.2d 809 , 814 (La. 1959)) and Dore v. Tugwell , 84 So.2d 199 , 204 (La. 1955) (citing Bradford v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1961

    Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Tex. 1, 75 S.W. 488, 492 (1903). t Halff, 75 Tex. 132, 12 S.W. 610 (1889); Conley v?%&$ers of the Republic, 106 Tex. 80, 156 S.W. 197 (1913); Mumme v. … Frohmiller, 45 Ariz. 490, 45 P. 2d 955 (1935); State v. Angle, 54 Ariz. 13, 91 P.2d 705 (1939). Caldwell v. Board of Regents, 54 Ariz. 404, 96 P.2d 401 (1939 ; Trotter v. Frank P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (1974)

    63 Op. Att'y Gen. 453 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1974

    In Martin v. … Spaulding v. Wood County (1935), 218 Wis. 224 , 260 N.W. 473 ; Maier v. Racine County (1957), 1 Wis.2d 384 , 84 N.W.2d 76 . Article IV , sec. 22 , Wis. Const., provides: "Powers of county boards.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 2006

    Estay v. Lafourche Parish School Board , 230 So.2d 443 , 446 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1969). Moreover, a public board is constituted to act in the interest of the public welfare as a deliberative body. … Generally, the legislative and discretionary powers given to a school board may not be delegated to its subordinates. Johnson v. Sabine Parish School Board , 140 So. 87 , 89 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1932). La.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 2002

    (See Grupe Development Co. v. Superior Court (1993) 4 Cal.4th 911 , 915-923 ; Loyola Marymount University v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1256 , 1262-1263 ; Canyon North Co. v. … Dist. v. City of Corona (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1577 , 1583-1587 ; Shapell Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2006)

    California Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2006

    (See §§ 22870, 22871, 22880, 22881, 22885, 22890, 22892, 22893, 22899, 22901; Valdes v. Cory (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 773 , 783-789 ; see also Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System v. … (See §§ 16300, 16301; Riley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950

    V. C. Marshall - Page 3 (V-1106) Sec. 2. … V. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. Oag 16-85, (1985)

    74 Op. Att'y Gen. 73 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1985

    Sundby v. Adamany , 71 Wis.2d 118 , 237 N.W.2d 910 (1976); State ex rel. Kleczka v. Conta , 82 Wis.2d 679 , 264 N.W.2d 539 (1978). *Page 75 1. … The board cannot make tax levies for future years or create a sinking fund. Immega v. Elkhorn , 253 Wis. 282 , 34 N.W.2d 101 (1948).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 2011

    In light of the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales, Louisiana, Inc. v. … brought against the board or its members or staff.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 2003

    Code, §§ 65800 - 65912 ; Euclid v. Ambler Co. (1926) 272 U.S. 365 , 386-395 ; Miller v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 477 , 484-488 .) … Board of Public Works, supra, 195 Cal. at p. 493 ; College Area Renters Landlord Assn. v. City of San Diego (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 677 , 687 ; Ewing v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2001

    We entertain little doubt that a Board director holds a public office. (See People ex rel. Chapman v. … (Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 , 1159 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 2006

    State v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, supra at 411. See also, Clement v. Daniels (Ark.Sup.Ct. … Byrd v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

    See also Thompson v. Roberts, 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998) (positions of mayor and city bookkeeper incompatible); Byrd v. … See however, The Bath Club, Inc., v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 7, 2000

    Bates v. State , 664 S.W.2d 563 (Mo.App. 1983). If a claim is made against a member of the Board, or the Board itself, however, the Legal Expense Fund is unavailable to whichever defendants may be named. … Nowhere within the LEF provisions is there coverage for individuals appointed to a board such as the Board of County Visitors. In Cates v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950

    V~. C. … V, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 2000

    Southwestern Bell Tel. v. Ar. Pub. Ser. , 69 Ark. App. 323 , ___ S.W.3d ___ (2000); Southwestern Bell v. Ar. Pub. Ser. , 68 Ark. App. 148 , 5 S.W.3d 484 (1999); ATT Comm. v. Arkansas Pub. Ser. Comm. , 67 Ark. … Bd. v. Bolding, 324 Ark. 238 , 920 S.W.2d 825 (1996); Douglass v. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. , 315 Ark. 575 , 869 S.W.2d 14 (1994); Junction City Sch. Dist. v. Alphin, 313 Ark. 456 , 855 S.W.2d 316 (1993); Brimer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949

    Oplnlens: V-6$, O-1422, O-989. … Opinions V-759, V-689, V-3\ 5, o-5087, O-4982; O-7491. Accordingly, we answer both your submitted questions in the negative.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Nebraska Attorney General Reports · May 16, 2001

    Of Equalization v. Graf , 258 Neb. 810 , 606 N.W.2d 736 (2000); Hoiengs v. County of Adams , 254 Neb. 64 , 574 N.W.2d 498 (1998); State ex rel. City of Elkhorn v. Haney , 252 Neb. 788 , 566 N.W.2d 771 (1997). … The Nebraska Supreme Court, in Halpin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (1972)

    61 Op. Att'y Gen. 165 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Mar 17, 1972

    Schultz v. Milwaukee County (1947), 250 Wis. 18 , 22 , 26 N.W.2d 260 . … They protected him against being deprived of the salary incident to his office during the term for which he was elected. * * *" In Feavel v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 2011

    bond, conditioned on the faithful execution of his or her office. 5 Relative to vacancies on the board, the special act provides that "[v]acancies created by the resignation, death, or removal from said board of commissioners … Pinellas Sports Authority , 461 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1984) (when a special act and a general law conflict, the special act will prevail). 8 See Florida Association of Counties, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.