Case law

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951

Article 2654-1, V. C. … Edgar, page 3 (V-1270) effect relating to the State Board for Vocational Education. “Sec. 2.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1952

Lannlng, page 2 (V-1511) 2. … Op. v-63 (1947).

(2008)

93 Op. Att'y Gen. 59 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 2008

See Z ickefoo se v. … HO § 9-202 (g)(3); Benson v. Mellor , 152 Md. 481 , 491 , 137 A. 294 (1927). 5 See Benson v.

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 2004

(See Eldridge v. … (Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 , 647-649 ; Stigall v. City of Taft, supra, 58 Cal.2d at p. 569 ; City of Imperial Beach v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 2006

Id., citing Nelson, supra and Board of Trustees v. Stodola, 328 Ark. 194 , 942 S.W.2d 255 (1997). … City of Little Rock v. Black Motor Lines, Inc., 208 Ark. 498 , 501 , 186 S.W.2d 665 (1945), citing Porter v. Waterman, 77 Ark. 383 , 91 S.W. 754 (1906); and Pace v.

(1972)

61 Op. Att'y Gen. 245 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · May 24, 1972

He may establish his home at a boarding house, a hotel, an apartment, a mobile home or in a more conventional house. … For similar holdings, see Anderson v. Brown (1971), 332 F. Supp. 1195 (D.C.S.D. Ohio, W.D.); Michael H. Kennedy, et al. v. Thomas Meskill, et al .

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1969

State v. City of " Austin, 160 Tex. 348, 331 S.W.2d 737 (1960); Bexar County v. Linden, 110 Tex. 339, 220 S.W. 761 (1920); Road Distric; No. 4, m County v. … Allreg, 123 Tex. 77, 68 S.W.2d 164 ( 9 4); Jefferson County <~ Board of Count and District Road Indebtedness, 143 Tex. 99 18 9 8 ( 4')y City of Aransas Pass v. Keel- ing, 112 Tei. 3~9~'%?S.~. 8:: 71423).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 2009

There is no language in the Board's organic law that appears to implicitly create authority for the Board to mandate continuing education by regulation. … Seidemann Assistant Attorney General JDC/RMS/tp 1 See, Eads Operating Co., Inc. v. Thompson , 93-2155 (La.App. 1 Cir. 10/7/94) , 646 So.2d 948 ; see also, State Through Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 2004

See generally A.C.A. § 14-14-1102 (b)(2)(C)(i) and Mackey v. McDonald, 255 Ark. 978 , 501 S.W.2d 726 (1974). … I interpret this to mean that a facilities board could receive public funds, which under state law must be remitted to the county treasury (A.C.A. § 14-14-1313 (Repl. 1998). 3 See generally Chaffin v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 2009

The board has adopted bylaws . . . [that] also address the number and make-up of the board. The board is considering making changes to the number and make-up of the board. … See , e.g. , Van Camp v. Van Camp , 333 Ark. 320 , 969 S.W.2d 184 (1998) ("fundamental principles of contract law require that both parties to a contract agree to any modification of the contract").

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1962

Section 35a of Article V of Senate Bil! … Smallhorst, page 4 (WW-1431) 0PI:IIONCOMNITTEE V1.V. Geppert, Chairman L. 1. Lollar Arthur Sandlin Ernest Fortenberry REVI.Z?JED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Leo:lardPassmore

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2001

GOV’TCODEANN. 8 2113.001(2)(A) (V emon 2000). … §Q 443.027 (Vernon Supp. 2001) (State Preservation Board may publicize Capitol buildings and grounds), 445.005 (advertising of Bob Bullock State History museum), 48 1.006(a)(6) (V emon 1998) (Texas Department of Economic

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 2007

Hawks v. City of Topeka , 176 Kan. 240 , 246 (1954). 7 Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of Pharmacy , 228 Kan. 579 (1980); State, ex rel. State Bd. of Healing Arts v. Beyrle , 269 Kan. 616 (2000). 8 Umbehr v. … Board of Wabaunsee County Commissioners , 252 Kan. 30 , 33 (1992); State ex rel. Tomasic v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kan ., 264 Kan. 293 , 301 (1998).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 2005

"zoning board"). … Sargent v. Lewis, 335 Ark. 188 , 979 S.W.2d 894 (1998). And finally, effect must be given to each word of the statute, so that no language is reduced to surplusage. See Locke v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 2004

See Louisiana Association of General Contractors v. Calcasieu PSB , 586 So.2d 1354 (La. 1991); Louisiana Teacher's Assoc. v. Orleans PSB , 303 So.2d 564 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1974); Disposal Systems, Inc. v. … U.S. v. Kokinda , supra.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1961

Section 39 of Article V of said bill reads as follows: "BUILDING ALTERATIONS PROHIBITED. … by the Board of Control.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 2002

See O'Malley v. Macejka , 44 N.Y.2d 530 , 535 (1978); People ex rel. Ryan v. Green , 58 N.Y. 295 , 304-05 (1874); Matter of Dupras v. County of Clinton , 213 A.D.2d 952 , 953 (3d Dep't 1995). … No. 86-3 (construing similar provision in Town Law § 267 (1), which prohibits town board members from serving on zoning board of appeals) (citing Wood v.

Opinion No. Oag 55-76, (1976)

65 Op. Att'y Gen. 145 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Aug 16, 1976

KLAUSER, Chairman, State Elections Board You have asked a number of questions related to the impact of the United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Buckley v. … However, the Court, relying on NAACP v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1944

Board of Xduoation, oreatrd by this Aot (Arts. 2675b-1 to 2675b-10, V. A. C. … msmbers of ths State Board of 3ucatlon ne providsd for in Seotlon 10 of this Act (Art. 2675b-10, V.

Opinion

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 2011

In City of Pineville v. … This principle is cited in Smith v. Town of Cotton Valley , 584 So.2d 1199 (La. Ct. App. 2 Cir. 1991), writ denied, 589 So.2d 1057 (La. 1991). 2 See also La. Atty. Gen. Op.