Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1998

Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE VALERIE BROWN … In Moody v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2009

See also Robinson v. Taylor , 342 Ark. 459 , 463 , 29 S.W.3d 691 (2000); McCarty v. Board of Trustees , 45 Ark. App. 102 , 117 , 872 S.W.2d 74 (1994). … Campbell v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2002

CODE ANN. 9 37-011(k), (0 (V emon Supp. 2002). … § 37.007(b), (4, (e), (f) (V emon Supp. 2002).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951

Cox $geoutiva Dlreator Board for Texas Stat,e Bospi- talsand Special Schools Austin, Texas~ 0pinfon Bo. v-IX&? … Cox - Page 5 (v-1172) Contracts made by the Board for architects' services to be paid from the State Hospitals and Special Schools Bullding Fund are not sub-

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949

(v-941) ,. … Logan, page 3 (v-941) Control should be procured by the Board.

Opinion No. Oag 40-77, (1977)

66 Op. Att'y Gen. 148 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1977

State v. Hamley , 137 Wis. 458 , 119 N.W. 114 (1909), Stoltman v. Lake , 124 Wis. 462 , 102 N.W. 920 (1905). … County boards have only such legislative powers as are conferred upon them by statute, expressly or by clear implication. Maier v. Racine County , 1 Wis.2d 384 , 84 N.W.2d 76 (1957).

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 2006

Chapman v. … (See §§ 31453, 31453.5, 31530-31536, 31580-31619; Bandt v. Board of Retirement (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 140 , 150-155 ; In re Retirement Cases (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 426 , 438-439 ; Westly v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 2021

Coastal Com. v. … (a); Ward v. San Diego School 69 Dist. (1928) 203 Cal. 712, 718-719; Kirchmann v.

Opinion No. (2009)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 2009

BROWN JR.Attorney General TAYLOR S. CAREY Deputy Attorney General. … App. 4th 1361 , 1375 , 1376 (2005). 24 Ehrlich v. City of Culver City , 12 Cal. 4th 854 , 895 (1996) (citing U.S. v.

Opinion No. Oag 101-76, (1976)

65 Op. Att'y Gen. 303 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1976

to county board members. … V I, sec. 4, or to the county executive, county assessor or judge, and the matter is not one of such statewide concern that it must be carried out by the use of the officer, board, commission or committee established by or

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 2009

Herbert , 404 U.S. 807 , 92 S.Ct. 52 , 30 L.Ed.2d 39 (1971) (summarily reversing Hebert v. … Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree , 1997-1256 (La. 1/21/98), 707 So.2d 12 ; Reinhardt v.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1999

(See Pomona Officers' Assn. v. City of Pomona (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 578 , 584-585 ; Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109 , 1119-1120 ; Oden v. … Board of Administration (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 194 , 198 ; Claypool v. Wilson (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 646 , 653-655 ; City of Sacramento v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 2003

(Stigall v. City of Taft (1962) 58 Cal.2d 656 , 569; Finnegan v. Schrader (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 572 , 579-580 ; Thorpe v. Long Beach Community College Dist. (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 655 , 659 ; Frazer-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. … (See also Thomson v. Call, supra, 38 Cal.3d at pp. 648-649; Stigall v. City of Taft, supra, 58 Cal.3d at p. 571; City Council v. McKinley, supra, 80 Cal.App.3d at p. 212 ; People v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 2008

With regard to your question of whether members of the Board of Commissioners of the District may serve as Trustees of the Foundation, the issue of membership for the Board of Trustees is addressed by Article V of the Articles … Further, Article V of the Bylaws, entitled "Amendments," provides that "The Member or the Board of Trustees may amend these Bylaws by a majority vote.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1984

Browning v. Tarrant County, 111 S.W. 748. … writ dim d); Wexler v. State, 241 S.W. 231 (Tex. P Civ. App. - Galveston 1922, no writ); Spencer v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1951

Article 2654-1, V. C. … Edgar, page 3 (V-1270) effect relating to the State Board for Vocational Education. “Sec. 2.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1987

e.a., Brown v. Truscott Indenendent School District, 34 S.W.2d 837 (Tex. 1931): Desdemona Indeoendent School District v. Howard, 34 S.W.Zd 840 (Tex. 1931); Cain v. Lumsden, 204 S.W. 115 (Tex. … * Te s a 'o Mccraw, 126 S.W.2d 627 (Tex. 1939); Brown v.

Opinion No. Oag 49-79, (1979)

68 Op. Att'y Gen. 133 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1979

in that capacity in excess of the sum the treasurer is authorized by the board to retain. … A county board may delegate powers which are purely ministerial and executive to a committee or to an officer. Duluth, South Shore Atlantic R. Co. v. Douglas County , 103 Wis. 75 , 79 N.W. 34 (1899). In French v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1969

State v. City of " Austin, 160 Tex. 348, 331 S.W.2d 737 (1960); Bexar County v. Linden, 110 Tex. 339, 220 S.W. 761 (1920); Road Distric; No. 4, m County v. … Allreg, 123 Tex. 77, 68 S.W.2d 164 ( 9 4); Jefferson County <~ Board of Count and District Road Indebtedness, 143 Tex. 99 18 9 8 ( 4')y City of Aransas Pass v. Keel- ing, 112 Tei. 3~9~'%?S.~. 8:: 71423).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 2006

Id., citing Nelson, supra and Board of Trustees v. Stodola, 328 Ark. 194 , 942 S.W.2d 255 (1997). … City of Little Rock v. Black Motor Lines, Inc., 208 Ark. 498 , 501 , 186 S.W.2d 665 (1945), citing Porter v. Waterman, 77 Ark. 383 , 91 S.W. 754 (1906); and Pace v.