Case law

(2002)

87 Op. Att'y Gen. 17 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 2002

Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc., 278 Md. 580 , 586-87 , 366 A.2d 360 (1976); Charles E. Brohawn Bros., Inc. v. Board of Trustees, 269 Md. 164 , 304 A.2d 819 (1973). … Prince George's County v. Board of Trustees, 271 Md. 21 , 27 , 313 A.2d 678 (1974).

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 2007

Tompkins v. … Hopkins v. Board of Education of the City of Council Grove , 106 Kan. 863 , 865 (1920); Rogers v. Slonaker , 32 Kan. 191 , 193 (1884); State ex rel. Toepke v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0486

Texas Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 2025

Auth. v. … See Aldine, 280 S.W.2d at 583 (observing the tax assessor-collector for a school district “is but an agent or employee of the Board to discharge the clerical duties necessary to carry out the school Board’s powers of taxation

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 7, 2008

See " Cherry Tells Road Board Choices ," Sam G. Harris, Arkansas Gazette, supra at 2A. … See also, State Board of Workforce Education v. King , 336 Ark. 409 , 985 S.W.2d 731 (1999) (striking down service of legislators on certain executive boards, and citing Starnes v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 2005

Johnny Brown Miami-Dade County School Board Attorney School Board Administration Building 1450 Northeast 2nd Avenue, Suite 400 Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. … Fla. 81-98 (1981), 78-76 (1978) and 75-203 (1975). 4 See, e.g., Alsop v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 2006

Quattlebaum v. … "), and Wright v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1978

Board of Adiustment of Citv of Fort Worth v. Stovall, 216 S.W.2d 171, 174 (Tex. 1949) (Board of Adjustment is a meida County v. City of Utica, 22 N.Y.S.‘Ld 642, 644 (Sup. Ct., App. … See Stelzer v. Huddleston, 526 S.W.2d 710 (Tex. Civ. App.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1999

, county or municipal office; State v. … Board of Trustees of City Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers in City of Tampa , 580 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1991); Frazier v. Pingree , 612 F.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2010

V, § 28. See State ex rei. Angelini v. … (emphasis added); McFall v. State Bd ofEduc., 110 S.W. 739, 740 (Tex. 1908) (holding that the supreme court may not issue mandamus against the State Board of Education, because Governor is a member thereof).

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 2010

); McFall v. … State Bd. of Educ , 110 S.W. 739 , 740 (Tex. 1908) (holding that the supreme court may not issue mandamus against the State Board of Education, because Governor is a member thereof). See also A T Consultants, Inc. v.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1979

Honorable Reagan V. Brown Commissioner of Agriculture Stephen F. Austin Building Austin, Texas 78711 Re: Whether a public official may receive an honorarium for delivering a speech. Dear Mr. … Brown: You have asked if a public official may receive an honorarium.

California Attorney General Opinion 22-402

107 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 1 · California Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 2024

Brown Act” until 1961. (Stats. 1961, c. 115. § 1, p. 1127.) 30 Freedom Newsp. Inc. v. Orange Co. Employees Ret. Sys. (1993) 6 Cal. 4th 821, 825. 31 Julian Volunteer Fire Co. Assn. v. … v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 16, 2007

Refunding Board of Arkansas , 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S.W.2d 980 (1941)). The Court had previously, in Clinton v. … See generally Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas , supra .

California Attorney General Opinion 24-102

California Attorney General Reports · May 8, 2025

Code, § 11120 et seq. 26 Torres v. Board of Commissioners (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 545, 549-550; see also McKee v. … Torres v.

Opinion No. (2007)

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 2007

A high school district's board of trustees is a "legislative body of a local agency" for purposes of the Brown Act. (§§ 54951, 54952, subd. (b); see Kavanaugh v. … (a)) and whose official actions are deemed to be under the Board's control ( Frazer v. Dixon Unified School Dist. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 781 , 792 , fn. 14; see also Main v.

Opinion No.

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 2011

A water district is a local agency for purposes of the Brown Act, 6 and a water district's board of directors is a "legislative body of a local agency" subject to the Act. 7 Under the Brown Act, each legislative body of a … Inc. v. Orange Co. Employees Ret. Sys. , 6 Cal. 4th 821 , 825 (1993) (Brown Act "adopted to ensure the public's right to attend the meetings of public agencies"). 16 Galbiso v. Orosi Pub. Util. Dist. , 167 Cal.

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 2001

the board? … We thus conclude that a majority of the board members of a local public agency may not e-mail each other to develop a collective concurrence as to action to be taken by the board without violating the Brown Act even if the

Opinion No. (2009)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 2009

In Frazer v. … Dist. , 29 Cal. 4th 911 (2003) (school district board is legislative body of local agency, subject to the Act). 11 Frazer v. Dixon Unified Sch. Dist. , 18 Cal.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2004

CODE ANN. 5 61.302(2) (V emon Supp. 2004). … CODEANN. 9 61.303(a) (V emon Supp. 2004).

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 23, 2005

Brown Act (Gov. … We have previously determined that a county retirement board is subject to the Brown Act's requirements. ( 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 412 , 413 (1982) ["A county retirement board, as a permanent board or commission of a `local