Case law

Brown v. State Personnel Board

166 Cal. App. 3d 1151 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1985

Assn. (1937) 20 Cal.App.2d 157, 165-166 [ 67 P.2d 368 ]; see also e.g., Lux v. Haggin, supra, 69 Cal. at pp. 269-270; Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners, supra, at p. 360 relying upon Brown v. … (Slivkoff v. Board of Trustees (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 394, 401 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 920 ].)

Brown v. State Personnel Board

43 Cal. App. 2d 70 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1941

(Nilsson v. State Personnel Board, 25 Cal. App. (2d) 699, at 705 [ 78 Pac. (2d) 467 ].) … (Kelly v. State Personnel Board, stipra.)

Brown v. Board of Education

42 A.D.2d 702 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1973

(Matter of Clausen v. Board of Edue. of City of N. Y., 39 A D 2d 708; Matter of Gordon v. State Univ. of N. Y. at Buffalo, 35 A D 2d 868, affd. 29 E Y 2d 684; Matter of Albury V. New York City Civ. Serv. … The above authorities have not been overruled, insofar as the situation at bar is concerned, *704 by Board of Regents v. Roth 408 TJ. S. 564, and Perry v. Sindermann, 408 TJ. S. 593. (See Canty v.

Brown v. Board of Education

108 Ky. 783 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jun 20, 1900

of said board.” … But it is insisted that in the case of Woods v. Board (Ky.) 53 S.

Brown v. Board of Review

8 Ill. App. 3d 19 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 25, 1972

The Board determined that Katherine Brown (claimant) was not entitled to receive benefits for the period of May 17, 1970 through June 6, 1970. The claimant has appealed. … (Reger v. Administrator, 132 Conn. 647 , 46 A.2d 844 ; Erie Resistor Corp. v. Board of Review, 94 A.2d 367 and Higgins v. Board of Review, etc., 111 A.2d 288 .) We find Nelson v.

Brown v. Board of Trustees

41 Cal. App. 100 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1919

The action was brought by Helena Brown, the widow of Alexander Brown, and by ten children and grandchildren of the deceased, to recover damages for the death of said Alexander .Brown, alleged to have been caused by the negligence … (Kenna v. Central Pac. R. R. Co., 101 Cal. 29 , [ 35 Pac. 333 ]; Brett v. Frank & Co., 153 Cal. 272 , [ 94 Pac. 1051 ]; Mugford v. Atlantic etc. Co., 7 Cal. App. 678 , [ 95 Pac. 674 ].)

Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

134 Pa. Commw. 31 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1990

Brown (claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee’s termination of claimant’s benefits. *33 The facts of this case are as follows. … Buckley v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Corbo’s AM PM Mini Market), 109 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 64, 530 A.2d 530 (1987). The City relies on Shenango, Inc. v.

Brown v. Franchise Tax Board

197 Cal. App. 3d 300 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1987

Background Plaintiff Sandra Brown represents the class of investors who paid the challenged tax. … Plaintiff Brown sought a refund of this tax on her own behalf and on behalf of the class. Companies also sought to be excused from reporting their distributions as taxable income. The Board denied both requests.

Brown v. Board of Education

81 N.M. 460 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1970

Brown v. Romero, 77 N.M. 547 , 425 P.2d 310 (1967). She subsequently filed a mandamus proceeding in the district court of Rio Arriba County, in accordance with a suggestion in Brown v. … Brown v. Hatley, supra.

Brown v. Handgun Permit Review Board

188 Md. App. 455 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 28, 2009

The Board affirmed the denial of Brown’s permit by a vote of three to zero. … See United States v. Brooks, 330 A.2d 245, 247 (D.C.1974). Consequently, the evidence before the Board supported the conclusion that Brown’s conviction must have been under § 22-3214(b).

Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM

202 N.J. Super. 312 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1985

Super. 312 (1985) 495 A.2d 119 CHARLIE BROWN OF CHATHAM, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … Plaintiff, Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc.

Brown v. Texas Board of Nurse Examiners

194 S.W.3d 721 · Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Jun 9, 2006

Eventually, the Board obtained a default judgment against Brown for failing to appear at a hearing to determine the status of her license. In April of 2000, her license was formally revoked by the Board. … At no point before Brown filed her brief did she raise the issue she attempts to do so here. “[E]ven a constitutional claim must have been asserted in the trial court in order to be raised on appeal.” Dreyer v.

Brown v. Board of Education

89 A.D.3d 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 2011

488 stances, any deficiencies in the APPR do not render the determination to discontinue his employment arbitrary and capricious since the hearing testimony provided ample grounds for his termination (see Matter of Sorell v … Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 168 AD2d 453 [1990]).

Brown v. Sandy City Board of Adjustment

339 Utah Adv. Rep. 13 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Mar 26, 1998

BACKGROUND Thomas and Nancy Brown, Dennis Clo-ward, and Joseph Bowers (the owners) owned homes in Sandy City. The homes owned by the Browns and Cloward were in areas zoned R-l-8 Residential. … Sandy, citing Ewing v.

Brown v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

60 A.D.3d 107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 2009

Between December 1, 2005, and July 15, 2006, it would have been reasonable for Brown to believe that the Racing and Wagering Board could change its position on the issue (see Matter of Jones v Amicone, 27 AD3d 465, 468 [2006 … v Board of Educ. of Northport-E.

Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

137 Pa. Commw. 575 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1991

Johnson v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Albert Einstein Medical Center), 137 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 176, 586 A.2d 991 (1991); Boehm v. … Brown prior to April 21, 1988. 1 .

Brown v. Suffolk County Board of Elections

264 A.D.2d 489 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 1999

Meisser, 22 NY2d 762 ; Matter of Merrill v Adler, 253 AD2d 505 ; Matter of Boyle v New York City Bd. of Elections, 185 AD2d 953 ; Matter of Zunno v Fein, 175 AD2d 935, 936 ). … The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, Matter of Ferraro v McNab, 60 NY2d 601, 603 ; Matter of Klug-man v King, 242 AD2d 346 ). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Sullivan, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Akron Board of Education

129 Ohio App. 3d 352 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1998

Defendant Akron Board of Education has attempted to appeal from an order of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that denied it summary judgment in a tort action brought against it by plaintiff Paul J. Brown. … In Mitchell v.

Brown v. Board of Education

29 Ill. App. 572 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 10, 1889

It seems that previous to the meeting of June 26, .1886, the board bad advertised for bids for the janitorship, and Brown’s was the lowest bid. … Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362 ; Polk v. Daly, 14 Abb. Pr. N. S. (N. Y.) 156; Costigan v. Mohawk R. R. Co., 2 Den. 609 ; Wood’s Master and Servant, p. 238.

Brown v. Board of Police Commissioners

58 Cal. App. 2d 473 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1943

Brown, decreeing that such respondents issue him a permit for the conduct of a game called “Defiance.” … In Jackson v.