Case law

Brown v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 2, 2021

Dru Darren Brown v. State of Maryland, No. 1103, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Woodward, J. … Previously, in Williams v.

Brown v. Singh

52 A.D.3d 367 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 19, 2008

contemporaneous range of motion limitations in his cervical and lumbar spine resulting from the accident, and therefore fails to raise an issue of fact as to whether his injuries were permanent or significant (see Thompson v

Brown v. State

866 So. 2d 94 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 21, 2004

Brown v. State., 638 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (table). … Brown v. State, 688 So.2d 976 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). On remand, the trial court vacated appellant’s sentences and imposed concurrent terms of 10 years in prison with 5-year mandatory mínimums.

Linvill v. Brown

9 Kan. App. 747 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Mar 19, 1900

(Rapp v. Kyle, 26 Kan. 93 .) The publication notice is not in the record. Its sufficiency must be presumed. … In the case of Johnson v.

Brown v. Outback Steakhouse

39 A.D.3d 450 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 2007

Corp., 304 AD2d 717 [2003]; Hopkins v Statewide Indus. Catering Group, 272 AD2d 577 [2000]; Eisenberg v Lunch Boy, 256 AD2d 93 [1998]). … Burmester, 37 AD3d 668 [2007]; Korina v New York City Tr.

Albers v. Brown

177 Ga. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 31, 1986

See in this regard Gregory v. King Plumbing, 127 Ga. App. 512 ( 194 SE2d 271 ); Drew v. Hagy, 134 Ga. App. 852 ( 216 SE2d 676 ); Ale-8-One of America v. Graphicolor Svcs., 166 Ga. … See generally Mathews v. City of Atlanta, 167 Ga. App. 168 ( 306 SE2d 3 ).

LaCrosse v. Brown

109 Wash. App. 1011 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 9, 2001

Dinten-Quiros v. Brown

49 A.D.3d 588 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 11, 2008

would warrant denial of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and a reasonable justification for the failure to have presented such facts at that time (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]; Madison v … Claire v Gaskin, 295 AD2d 336, 337 [2002]). Here, the plaintiff did not provide a reasonable justification for her failure to proffer the alleged new facts in opposition to the defendant’s prior motion.

Brown v. State

226 Ga. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 29, 1997

Morgan v. State, 191 Ga. App. 367, 368 [( 381 SE2d 583 ) (1989)].” While this is a correct statement of the law, it is not addressed to Brown’s enumerations. … Brown also acknowledged that his attorney had explained his rights to him, that he understood such rights, and that his plea was freely and voluntarily given. See Scurry v. State, 194 Ga.

People v. Brown

38 A.D.3d 795 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2007

No juror was questioned or excused in the absence of the court (see People v Toliver, 89 NY2d 843 [1996]; People v Pinkney, 272 AD2d 52 [2000]). … Under the circumstances, the record does not demonstrate that there was an improper delegation of judicial authority by the trial court (see People v Pulido, 278 AD2d 254 [2000]).

Stroman v. Brown

194 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1984

Super. 307 (1984) 476 A.2d 874 LEROY STROMAN AND MATTIE STROMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MARGUERITE C. BROWN AND WILLIAM D. BROWN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … In Kulko v.

People v. Brown

91 Ill. App. 3d 582 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 5, 1980

Binns recognized defendant (a prior acquaintance) and his automobile (a two-tone brown Cadillac). … Brown (1977), 47 Ill. App. 3d 920 , 365 N.E.2d 514 ); however, in order to impeach a witness by omission, there must be materiality and a proper foundation should be laid (People v. Hamelin (1979), 75 Ill.

People v. Brown

749 P.2d 436 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1987

People v. Macias, 631 P.2d 584 (Colo.1981). … See People v. Lucero, 201 Cal.Rptr. 99 , 154 Cal.App.3d 245 (5th Dist.1984).

Brown v. State

72 S.W.3d 233 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2002

Thereafter, it was retransferred “for reconsideration in light of George Brown, Jr. v. State of Missouri, [ 66 S.W.3d 721 ] (No. … See Brown v. State, 19 S.W.3d 190 (Mo.App.2000). .

Brown v. Parish

1 La. App. 246 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1924

Brown.” On January 10, 1924, the owner of the property, J. P. Brown, filed this suit, setting up the fact that he had leased the property to C. M. … Brown.”

Brown v. Singletary

732 So. 2d 364 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 5, 1999

McCray v. State, 699 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1997). ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Buckingham v. Brown

356 Ill. App. 3d 1149 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 3, 2005

App.3d 1149 BUCKINGHAM v. BROWN. No. 5-04-0778. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. May 3, 2005. Affirmed.

People v. Brown

112 A.D.2d 13 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 1985

People v Bones, 103 AD2d 1012 ).

Wells v. Brown

303 So. 2d 395 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 27, 1974

Dawson v. Blue Cross Assoc., Fla.App. 1st, 1974, 293 So.2d 90 . However, it is also incumbent upon the pleader to state a cause of action alleging legal liability. Messana v. … Hawk v. Trumbull Construction Co., 401 Pa. 570 , 166 A.2d 41 (1960); Martin v. Central Engineering Co., 350 Ill.App. 589 , 113 N.E.2d 573 (1953).

Brown v. State

21 Ala. App. 298 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1926