Case law

Brown v. Brewington

513 S.W.2d 768 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1974

Brown, d/b/a Brown Meat Company, as garnishee. Brown was defendant’s employer at the time of the garnishment. Brown failed to withhold defendant’s wages as required by the garnishment. … Respondent cites Goforth v. Goforth, 301 S.W.2d 877 (Mo. App.1957), as authority for the proposition that an order granting the 90% exemption from garnishment is not an appealable order. Goforth v.

People v. Brown

251 A.D.2d 341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1998

as to People’s exhibits 20 and 21, the People showed “ ‘circumstances providing] reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition’ ” of the canvas bag and bullets found near the defendant’s apartment (People v … Julian, 41 NY2d 340 , 343, quoting Amaro v City of New York, 40 NY2d 30, 35 ).

State v. Brown

2014 Ohio 4381 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 2014

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-4381.] … State v. A.H., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98622, 2013-Ohio-2525, ¶ 10, citing State v.

Brown v. State

229 Ga. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 30, 1997

See Wells v. State, 212 Ga. App. 60, 63-64 ( 441 SE2d 460 ) (1994); Johnson v. State, 164 Ga. App. 501, 504 ( 297 SE2d 38 ) (1982); see also Thornton v. State, supra at 165; cf. Ponder v. State, 191 Ga. … See also Leonard v. State, 228 Ga. App. 792 ( 492 SE2d 747 ) (1997), the appeal of Brown’s co-defendant, Spencer Charles Leonard.

Brown v. Eimicke

144 A.D.2d 460 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1988

Coombs v Edwards, 280 NY 361 ; Matter of Corbeau Constr. … Corp. v Board of Educ., 32 AD2d 958 ). The proper procedure for compelling obedience to a subpoena is an application pursuant to CPLR 2308. We take no position on the merits of such an application.

Brown v. State

920 So. 2d 694 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 3, 2006

People v. Brown

203 A.D.2d 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1994

, People v Bond, 156 AD2d 573 ). … Soto, 198 AD2d 38 ; People v Fulmore, 133 AD2d 169, 170 ; see also, People v Morales, 37 NY2d 262, 271-272 ; People v Kirkland, 192 AD2d 414 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1075 ).

Brown v. Buehner

79 Or. App. 58 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1986

Petitioners challenge the validity of a Builders Board rule, pursuant to which the Board dismissed their claim against the builder of their house. … If the court action is in existence before the claim is submitted to the Board, the Board may refuse to accept the claim. That action effectively terminates any Board involvement.

Brown v. State

24 So. 3d 664 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 15, 2009

24 So.3d 664 (2009) Syehean BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D09-176. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 15, 2009. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. … See Giuliano v. State, 46 So.2d 182 (Fla.1950). MONACO, C.J., TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Sprague

229 Ill. App. 338 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 9, 1923

In support of this the cases of Plew v. Board, 274 Ill. 232 ; Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. Miller, 194 Ill. App. 316 ; Anderson Computing Scale Co. v. Hattenbach, 199 Ill. App. 467 ; Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. … Plew v. Board, supra. And in Alpena Portland Cement Co. v. Jenkins & Reynolds Co., 244 Ill. 355 , and Finch & Co. v.

Brown v. Elder

182 Ga. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 17, 1987

Appellant Brown and appellee Elder entered into a contract for the purchase of appellant’s home. In a separate agreement, appellant agreed to sell specified items of personalty to appellee. … Compare Giles v. Smith, 80 Ga. App. 540 ( 56 SE2d 860 ) (1949), cited by appellant. 2.

Brown v. Eppinette

833 So. 2d 1268 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 2002

Vivian Kattapong, a board-certified neurologist, who was accepted as an expert. Dr. Kattapong testified that she had reviewed the medical records of Brown's treatment at GRMC in March 1994. Dr. … Roberts v. Cox, supra ; Iseah v. E.A. Conway Memorial Hospital, 591 So.2d 767 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991).

Brown v. Coffman

54 S.W.2d 237 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1932

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the habeas corpus proceedings brought ■by appellants Babe Auburg Brown joined by her husband, Robert A. Brown, against appel-lees, T. F. … S.; Davis v. Sears (Tex. Com. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 99, 100 ; Tunnell v. Reeves (Tex. Com. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 707 ; Duckworth v. Thompson (Tex. Com. App.) 37 S.W.(2d) 731 ; Legate v. Legate, 87 Tex. 248 , 28 S. W. 281 .

Brown v. Peterson

117 Ill. App. 401 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 15, 1904

Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court. Lemuel L. … Walker v. Carey, 53 Ill. 470 ; Allen v. LeMoyne, 102 Ill. 28 .

Brown v. State

692 So. 2d 987 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 2, 1997

Brown appeals from his judgment and sentence of robbery with a weapon. 1 He argues on appeal that the trial court erred in sentencing him, a juvenile, to adult sanctions without a written sentencing order imposing them. … Smith v. State, 684 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Oliver v. State, 681 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Crabb v. State, 676 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Roberts v. State, 677 So.2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

State v. Brown

5 Neb. Ct. App. 889 · Nebraska Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1997

See, also, People v. … See, e.g., U.S. v.

Brown v. Moodie

116 A.D.2d 980 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 24, 1986

Tompkins v R. B. D. … It was clearly improper for the court to communicate with the juror in absence of the parties (see, Silverman v New Rochelle Hosp., 98 AD2d 774 ; Linke v Savage, 39 AD2d 326, 327 ; Gundersen v All Am.

State v. Brown

117 Wash. App. 1041 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 30, 2003

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-01453-1, Jay V. White, J., entered June 28, 2002. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brown v. Garton

86 N.J. Eq. 289 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 31, 1916

The complainants are Horace Brown, an infant of the age of seventeen years, and John Brown, an infant of the age of eleven years. The bill was preferred and filed by Della C. Dare, as their next friend. … Thompson v. Hart, 58 N. Y. App. Div. 439; affirmed, Same Case, 169 N. Y. 571 . "We are not without adjudication on this question in our own state. In Tomkins v. Miller, 27 Atl.

Evans v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 23, 2010

Drake, a board-certi- fied pathologist, performed an autopsy on Romann. … Fichtel v. Board of Directors of River Shore of Naperville Condominium Ass'n, Hillcrest Management Co., 389 Ill. App. 3d 951, 956, 907 N.E.2d 903, 907 (2009).