Case law

Brown v. Williams

211 Ill. App. 39 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 5, 1918

In Randolph County v. … The cases of Conant v. Watts and Church v.

Brown v. State

277 Ga. App. 514 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 7, 2006

of Brown and Middlebrooks. … Fulton v. State, 278 Ga. 58, 61 (6) ( 597 SE2d 396 ) (2004); Johnson v. State, 256 Ga. 604, 605 (2) ( 351 SE2d 623 ) (1987); Ogles v. State, 238 Ga. 716 ( 235 SE2d 384 ) (1977); Hubbard v. State, 259 Ga.

Rambo v. Greene

2006 Pa. Super. 231 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2006

Ammlung v. … Long v. Brown, 399 Pa.Super. 312 , 582 A.2d 359, 363 (1990). Id. citing Ingrassia Construction Co. v.

Rogers v. Brown

884 So. 2d 523 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 13, 2004

See, e.g., Shaw v. … court to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court through re-evaluation of the testimony and evidence,” but rather the test is “whether the judgment of the trial court is supported by competent evidence”); Harbin v.

Brown v. State

45 Ala. App. 265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Dec 9, 1969

See Knox v. State, 42 Ala.App. 578 , 172 So.2d 787 , cert. den. 277 Ala. 699 , 172 So.2d 795 ; Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 ; Mapp v. … Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 ; Berry v. State, 231 Ala. 437 , 165 So. 97 ; Potter v. State, 44 Ala.App. 376 , 209 So.2d 856 .

Brown v. State

14 Fla. L. Weekly 852 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 4, 1989

Brown’s disruptive behavior during the voir dire and the proceedings prior to the trial itself demonstrates that the trial judge properly exercised the discretion he' possesses to insure a properly conducted trial. … See Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 , 90 S.Ct. 1057 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970); Foster v. Wainwright, 686 F.2d 1382 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1213 , 103 S.Ct. 1209 , 75 L.Ed.2d 449 (1983); see Jones v.

State v. Brown

148 S.W.3d 848 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2004

Arlen Brown appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of methamphetamine. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.

State v. Brown

159 S.W.3d 528 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2005

Andrew Brown appeals his conviction of one count of the class B felony of distribution of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 2000.

Brennemann v. Brown

30 Ohio App. 84 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1928

The petition recites that the defendants, Brown, Krollman, and Towle are the qualified and acting Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio; that the plaintiff entered into a contract with Robert C. … Scofield v. Excelsior Oil Co., et al, 20 O. C.C. (n. s.) 513. The only language in the petition on which plaintiff claims that he states a cause of action is that he furnished certain materials and labor.

Brown v. State

50 Okla. Crim. 103 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1931

Brown testified in her defense that the articles had been purchased from a peddler. They also' offered evidence tending to establish an alibi. Mr. Brown did not testify. … Brown took the witness stand and attempted to explain the possession of the stolen property by saying that she purchased it from a peddler. In the case of Davis v. State, 7 Okla.

Arnold v. Brown

42 Ga. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 8, 1930

Oliver v. Webb, 12 Ga. App. 216 (3) ( 76 S. E. 1081 ) ; Freeman v. Holmes, 62 Ga. 556 ; Georgia Grocery Co. v. Brunson, 24 Ga. App. 484 ( 101 S. E. 130 ). 2.

Riddell v. Brown

32 A.D.3d 1212 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 22, 2006

Brown for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her. … Brown is dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against June A.

Brown v. State

23 Tex. Ct. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1887

As to the facts expected to be proved by the witness Brown, they were proved by the State’s witness Moss, and were not disputed. … (Cole v. The State, 16 Texas Ct. App., 461; Reed v. The State, Id., 586; Cohen v. The State, 20 Texas Ct. App., 224.)

Rector v. Brown

208 S.W. 702 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 12, 1918

Rector, the appellant, being the legal and equitable owner and holder of the note, filed suit in the district court of Hamilton county against Hugh Brown, this appellee, Maude-Brown, appellee’s wife, L. L. … “On the 8th of September, 1915, he dismissed his suit against defendant Hugh Brown, defendant B. L. Wilson and R. K. Wilson, and took judgment with writ of inquiry against defendants Maude Brown, John D. Sears and O. A.

State v. Brown

81 N.C. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

While the indictments allege that the funds belonged to “Lott-Brown,” they do not allege that defendant is the “Brown” in the firm name. Courts take judicial notice of subjects and facts of common knowledge. Smith v. … The following cases, e.g., are per *286 tinent: Hudson v. State, 408 So. 2d 224 (Fla. App. 1981); State v. Elsbury, 63 Nev. 463 , 175 P. 2d 430 (1946); Patterson v. Bogan, 261 S.C. 87 , 198 S.E. 2d 586 (1973); State v.

Brown v. Tankersley

31 Ga. App. 23 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 3, 1923

From the evidence it clearly appears that Joe Brown owned and operated the Brown Transfer Company, and that Wiley was driving a car which belonged to Brown and which ordinarily was used in his transfer business. … Powell v. Berry, 145 Ga. 696 , (5) ( 89 S. E. 753 , L. R. A. 1917A, 306). See also Southern Ry. Co. v. Weatherby, 20 Ga. App. 399 (2) ( 93 S. E. 31 ), and citations. 4.

Propst v. Brown

854 S.W.2d 844 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1993

Brawley v. McNary, 811 S.W.2d 362 (Mo. banc 1991) [1]. Deference will be given to the trial court’s ability to judge the credibility of the witnesses. Id.; Rule 73.01(c)(2). … Brown v. Mercantile Bank of Poplar Bluff, 820 S.W.2d 327 (Mo.App.1991) [25-27]. Punitive damages are to be awarded for outrageous conduct, or for a party’s evil motive or reckless indifference to the rights of others.

Brown v. Johnson

107 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1932

In Greenwich Bank v. Commercial Banking Corporation, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 159 , 163„, this court said: “Nor does it matter that the negligence of the plaintiff contributed to the double payment. … Kunkel, 267 Pa. 163, 169 ; Meredith v. Haines, 14 W. N. C. 364, 366.”

Marty v. Brown

34 Ill. App. 3d 660 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 17, 1975

Stuckart v. Shortall, 287 Ill. 150 , 122 N.E. 60 (1919); Lindheimer v. Nelson, 369 Ill. 312 , 16 N.E.2d 734 (1938). … Shirk v. Glass; People ex rel. McDonough v. Birtman Electric Co.) Section 44 of the Act (Ill. Rev.

State v. Brown

2014 Ohio 4888 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2014

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-4888.] … See State v. Brown, 5th Dist. Richland No. 13CA43, 2014-Ohio-1409 ("Brown I-A"). Common Pleas Case No. 2012-CR-744 {¶10}.