Case law

People v. Brown

291 A.D.2d 505 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 19, 2002

are not beyond criticism, when viewed in its entirety, the trial court’s conduct fell within the bounds of judicial discretion in controlling the proceedings before it and did not constitute reversible error (see, People v … Sevencan, 258 AD2d 485 ; People v Serrano, 253 AD2d 531 ; People v Riddick, 251 AD2d 517 ).

State v. Brown

117 Wash. App. 1039 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 30, 2003

Ziti v. Brown

102 A.D.2d 825 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 1984

reversed, on the law, with costs to defendants payable by Mot Cab Corp., motion granted, and complaint dismissed. 11 Thomas Ziti was injured when the taxicab he was driving was struck by a van driven by defendant Michael Brown … Brown. Thereafter Ziti and his wife commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services, etc. In their bill of particulars plaintiffs alleged that defendants were negligent.

Brown v. Eimicke

144 A.D.2d 460 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1988

Coombs v Edwards, 280 NY 361 ; Matter of Corbeau Constr. … Corp. v Board of Educ., 32 AD2d 958 ). The proper procedure for compelling obedience to a subpoena is an application pursuant to CPLR 2308. We take no position on the merits of such an application.

Brown v. State

75 So. 3d 1226 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Feb 26, 2010

75 So.3d 1226 (2010) SHANNON WAYNE BROWN v. STATE. No. CR-08-1106. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. February 26, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Brown v. State

920 So. 2d 694 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 3, 2006

Chesonis v. Brown

567 Utah Adv. Rep. 6 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Dec 14, 2006

Brennan v. … Ellison v. Ford Motor Co., 847 F.2d 297, 300 (6th Cir.1988).

Brown v. State

87 Ga. App. 244 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 19, 1952

Brown v. State, 34 Ga. App. 452 ( 129 S. E. 664 ). The reasonableness or unreasonableness of the explanation given by the defendant for his presence at the still was for the jury. Chester v. State, 74 Ga. … While it is not unlawful for one to be present at a liquor still while it is in operation (Brown v.

Thuemler v. Brown

18 Pa. Super. 117 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1901

When the lessee gave notice to the lessor of his intention to take the land under the option to buy, the agreement became a contract of sale, binding on both parties: Newell’s Appeal, 100 Pa. 513 ; Knerr v. … Bender, 87 Pa. 419 ; Bitner v. Brough, 11 Pa. 127 . These damages are compensatory. They are such as naturally flowed from the breach: Billmeyer v. Wagner, 91 Pa. 92 .

Brown v. Waters

2 Md. Ch. 201 · High Court of Chancery of Maryland · Dec 15, 1850

Brown, as the administrator of Jacob Waters, deceased, and Anne Elizabeth Waters, the only child and heir at law of said Jacob, by the said Brown, as her next friend, filed their petition in this cause, in which they allege … Brown, administrator of Jacob Waters, and Ann E. Waters, the heir at law of said Jacob, filed on the 7th of June last, and the answer thereto of Hugh Gelston, filed on the 3d of September following.

Werner v. Brown

44 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 5, 1980

Grimstad v. Dordan, 256 Or 135, 139 , 471 P2d *324 778 (1970); Beaver v. Davis, 275 Or 209, 211 , 550 P2d 428 (1976); Russell v. Gullett, 285 Or 63 , 589 P2d 729 (1979). … In State v.

Brown v. Cobb

63 Cal. App. 533 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1923

In the case of Moultrie v. … In the case of Curtin v.

Brown v. Peters

39 Ill. App. 3d 962 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 9, 1976

Brown was designated as executor. … (Feder v. Luster (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 6 , 294 N.E.2d 293 .)

State v. Brown

164 Mo. App. 726 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1912

[Smith v. Railway, 55 Mo. 601 ; Klotz v. Perteet, 101 Mo. 213 , 13 S. W. 955 ; Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622 ; Reno v. Fitz Jarrell, 163 Mo. 411 , 63 S. W. 808 ; Roberts v. Jones, 148 Mo. 368 , 49 S. W. 985 .] … S. 1909; State v. Donohue, 139 Mo. App. 639 , 124 S. W. 42 ; State v. Benton, 163 Mo. App. 39 , 145 S. W. 833 .]

Brown v. Williams

211 Ill. App. 39 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 5, 1918

In Randolph County v. … The cases of Conant v. Watts and Church v.

Brown v. Mayfield

92 So. 2d 762 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1957

92 So.2d 762 (1957) James Herman BROWN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J. Earl MAYFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 8638. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. … Brown, on March 21, 1934, from the present defendant, J. Earl Mayfield.

Brown v. Coffman

54 S.W.2d 237 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1932

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the habeas corpus proceedings brought ■by appellants Babe Auburg Brown joined by her husband, Robert A. Brown, against appel-lees, T. F. … S.; Davis v. Sears (Tex. Com. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 99, 100 ; Tunnell v. Reeves (Tex. Com. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 707 ; Duckworth v. Thompson (Tex. Com. App.) 37 S.W.(2d) 731 ; Legate v. Legate, 87 Tex. 248 , 28 S. W. 281 .

Brown v. State

170 Ga. App. 305 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 14, 1984

Gary Brown appeals his conviction of rape, enumerating as the sole alleged error the refusal of the trial court to admit certain evidence relating to the victim’s sexual behavior. … See OCGA § 24-2-3; Grant v. State, 160 Ga. App. 837 (1) ( 287 SE2d 681 ) (1982).

Mason Ex Rel. Mason v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

189 S.W.3d 217 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 30, 2005

King by King v. Kartanson, 720 S.W.2d 65, 68 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986); Roberts v. Robertson County Board of Education, 692 S.W.2d 863, 872 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985); Cadorette v. … Kindred v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 946 S.W.2d 47 (Tenn. Ct.

State v. Brown

5 Neb. Ct. App. 889 · Nebraska Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1997

See, also, People v. … See, e.g., U.S. v.