Case law

Brown v. State

943 So. 2d 918 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 6, 2006

BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D06-5609. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 6, 2006. Edward L. Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Brown v. State

943 So. 2d 918 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 6, 2006

People v. Brown

195 A.D.2d 474 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 1993

Nevertheless, in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, we find that the prosecutorial misconduct constituted harmless error (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 ).

Brown v. State

949 So. 2d 1085 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 2, 2007

Appellant, Kareem Brown [“Brown”], appeals the- order of the trial court revoking his probation and sentencing him to the Department of Corrections for 8.3 years. … The court determined that Brown violated his probation.

People v. Brown

159 A.D.2d 411 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 22, 1990

(Notably, we have already determined that the lineup was fair [People v Brown, 138 AD2d 983 ].) After six viewings, counsel spoke to defendant and left. … (See, People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184, 193 .) Defendant raises several claims which have not been preserved for review by this court as a matter of law, and we thus decline to reach them. (CPL 470.05 [2].)

Brown v. Pritchett

633 S.W.2d 294 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1982

See Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp., 603 S.W.2d 627 (Mo.App.1980) [2-5]. Each element must be established in order for plaintiff to recover. … Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp., supra.

Bradford v. Brown

37 Tex. Civ. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1904

Bass v. Mitchell, 22 Texas, 293 ; Stafford v. King, 30 Texas, 257 ; Meyer v. Hale, 23 S. W. Rep., 990 ; Clayton v. Rhem, 67 Texas, 53 . … George Brown.

People v. Brown

171 Ill. App. 3d 993 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 17, 1988

JUSTICE MURRAY delivered the opinion of the court: After a jury trial, defendant Vincent Brown was convicted of murder (111. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 83, par. 9 — 1) and sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment. … (People v. R.C. (1985), 108 Ill. 2d 349, 353 , 483 N.E.2d 1241 , citing Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 473-74 , 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 723 , 86 S. Ct. 1602, 1627-28 .)

Brown v. Mortensen

181 Cal. App. 4th 789 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2010

The Browns rely on Credit Data of Arizona, Inc. v. State of Ariz. (9th Cir. 1979) 602 F.2d 195 , Davenport v. Farmers Ins. Group (8th Cir. 2004) 378 F.3d 839 , and Cisneros v. U.D. … (See Gorman v.

Brown v. State

666 So. 2d 240 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 5, 1996

Compare Alfonso v. … Next, Brown argues that the trial court erred in requiring him to maintain full-time employment as a special condition of probation. To support his argument, Brown cites Armstrong v.

Brown v. Rowland

137 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 31, 1946

Brown, died on July 24th, 1942. … In Blaine v. Krysowaty, 135 N.J. Eq. 355 ; 38 Atl.

Brown v. Arhelger

198 S.W. 811 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1917

Joab Brown, appellant, became indebted to them and executed his note for said amount, which was payable to G. A. Arhelger alone. Brown paid part of the *812 note, and was sued for the balance. … Thompson v. Cartwright, 1 Tex. 87 , 46 Am. Dec. 95 ; Wimbish v. Holt, 26 Tex. 673 ; Brown v. Chenoworth, 51 Tex. 477 ; Allison v. Insurance Co., 87 Tex. 593 , 30 S. W. 547 ; Cleveland v.

Brown v. State

162 Ga. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 27, 1982

The testimony presented by the state at the Jackson v. … See generally Jackson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 255, 256 ( 274 SE2d 665 ) (1980); Nicholson v. State, 158 Ga. App. 858 (1) ( 282 SE2d 407 ) (1981).

Brown v. Horn

32 Ga. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 19, 1924

Horn sued Brown and others on a purchase-money note. … See Hirsch v. Oliver, 91 Ga. 554 ( 18 S. E. 354 ); Dendy v. Gamble, 59 Ga. 434 ; cited in Rheney v. Anderson, 22 Ga. App. 417 , 420 et seq. ( 96 S. E. 217 ).

Brown v. LeBlanc

30 So. 3d 1183 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2010

At the outset, we note that in State v. Dunn, 408 So. 2d 1319, 1322 (La. 1982) and State ex rel. Turner v. … California Department of Corrections v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499, 505 , 115 S. Ct. 1597, 1601 , 131 L. Ed. 2d 588 (1995); State ex rel. Olivieri v.

State v. Brown

123 Wash. App. 1022 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 20, 2004

People v. Brown

264 A.D.2d 12 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 2000

We reject defendant’s contention that the term “parent” is ambiguous (see, Penal Law § 135.00 [3]; § 135.30) and that, pursuant to the rule of lenity (see, Matter of Kimberly H., 196 AD2d 192, 195 ; People v Jackson, 106

People v. Brown

131 Ill. App. 2d 5 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 5, 1971

James Brown was found guilty but was granted a new trial. … Defendant cites People v. Decker, 310 Ill. 234 , and People v. Shook, 35 Ill.2d 597 . In People v.

People v. Brown

182 A.D.2d 563 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 1992

defendant’s arguments on direct appeal that the court improperly encouraged the jury to take notes and that the court’s cautionary instructions were inadequate are unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v … Over defense counsel’s objection, the prosecutor improperly implied in his summation that the People’s witnesses were worthy of belief because they exposed themselves to danger by testifying in court (People v Brown, 76 AD2d

Brown v. State

418 So. 2d 464 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 25, 1982

These issues are foreclosed by virtue of the defendant’s plea, Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), and, therefore, the trial court properly denied relief on these issues. … See LeDuc v. State, 415 So.2d 721 (Fla.1982); Jones v. State, 384 So.2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded with instructions. LETTS, C. J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.