Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.79s
207 Mo. App. 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1921
[Scott v. Shy, 53 Mo. 478, 482 ; Haber v. Brown, 101 Cal. 445 .] … [Brown v. Barber, 244 Mo. 138, 150, 151 ; 27 Cyc. 1169; Horner v. Scott, 242 Pa. 432 .]
Cited 2 timesPublished2 So. 3d 275 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 27, 2009
2 So.3d 275 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 5D08-2881. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 27, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished109 Ga. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 13, 1964
App. 543, 549 ( 37 SE2d 372 ), Pendley v. Credit Equipment Corp., 92 Ga. App. 658 ( 89 SE2d 567 ), Markan Realty Co. v. Klarman, 99 Ga. App. 703, 704 (1) ( 109 SE2d 907 ), Floyd Const. Co. v. Stanley, 101 Ga. … Since Brown has acquired the note from the bank and is now the holder of it, we think his position here is very similar to and no better than that of the plaintiff in Arnold v.
Cited 3 timesPublished382 Ill. App. 3d 1223 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 15, 2008
Dec. 772 YARBROUGH v. BROWN. No. 3-07-0427. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. May 15, 2008. Rev'd & rem.
Cited 0 timesPublished133 Wash. App. 1005 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 25, 2006
Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Brown and Kulik, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublished57 Cal. App. 2d 1018 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1943
The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Parker, Director of Agriculture, et al. v. Brown, - U.S. - [ 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. -], is controlling upon this appeal.
Cited 1 timesPublished181 A.D.2d 1041 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 1992
Bailey, 159 AD2d 1009, 1010 ; People v Betances, 145 AD2d 961 ). … Further support for the inference that the gun did not belong to defendant is found in the fact that the gun was unloaded and no ammunition for it was found in the apartment (see, People v Bailey, supra).
Cited 4 timesPublished13 Fla. L. Weekly 235 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 20, 1988
Based on those facts, Brown contends that he could not be found guilty of possessing the drugs in the bathroom. We believe the supreme court’s decision in Brown v. … Wale v. State, 397 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Cited 2 timesPublished50 So. 3d 1145 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 22, 2010
50 So.3d 1145 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D10-38. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 22, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublished45 A.D.3d 1400 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2007
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
292 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text12 Ill. App. 2d 368 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 9, 1957
Cited 1 timesPublished200 A.D.2d 439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1994
Finally, the award of pension benefits was appropriately determined in accordance with the principles set forth in Majauskas v Majauskas ( 61 NY2d 481 ), and the distribution of marital assets was otherwise equitable.
Cited 0 timesPublished205 Ga. App. 31 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 14, 1992
Appellant/defendant Cecil Claude Brown appeals his conviction • for two counts of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. … See Jackson v. State, 177 Ga. App. 718 ( 341 SE2d 274 ) (1986); Williams v. State, 162 Ga. App. 680 (1) ( 292 SE2d 560 ) (1982).
Cited 4 timesPublished954 S.W.2d 707 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1997
This case involves the Browns’ attempt to attack a determination by the Child Abuse and Neglect Review Board (CANRB) 1 that the Browns neglected a foster child. *708 The Browns could have sought de novo judicial review of … The Browns assert that Dye v.
Cited 2 timesPublished78 A.D.2d 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 24, 1980
Therefore, said error must be considered harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 ; People v Cook, 42 NY2d 204, 208-209 ; People v Perez, 36 NY2d 848, 849-850 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished222 A.D.2d 392 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 1995
The plaintiff Derek Brown was operating the vehicle in which the plaintiff Michelle Brown was a passenger. … Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying Derek Brown’s motion to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaims for contribution against him (see, Matter of Torres v State of New York, 67 AD2d 814 ). Bracken, J.
Cited 5 timesPublished74 Okla. Crim. 249 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1942
Brown, was charged in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county with the crime of operating a motor vehicle on a state highway, in the nighttime, with only one headlight burning, was tried, convicted and sentenced to pay … Brown v. State, 74 Okla. Cr. 246 , 125 P. 2d 234 , decided on this date.
Cited 1 timesPublishedConseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Hill
252 Ga. App. 774 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 8, 2001
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Brown, 198 Ga. App. 653, 656 (3) ( 402 SE2d 753 ) (1991). We conclude that this defect violated OCGA § 51-12-5.1 (d). … Brown, supra, 198 Ga. App. at 654 (1).
Cited 34 timesPublished
Ask Donna