Case law

Brown v. State

4 So. 3d 1223 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 9, 2009

4 So.3d 1223 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 1D08-0925. District Court of Appeal Florida, First District. March 9, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

74 Ga. App. 880 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 21, 1947

Cook v. State, 124 Ga. 653, 655 (3) ( 53 S. E. 104 ); Well v. State, 73 Ga. App. 748 (2, 3) ( 38 S. E. 2d, 54 ); Byars v. State, 73 Ga. App. 727 ( 38 S. E. 2d, 53 ). … Smith v. State, 125 Ga. 296, 299 ( 54 S. E. 127 ). See also Pressley v. State, supra.

Brown v. State

993 So. 2d 967 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 24, 2008

993 So.2d 967 (2008) BROWN v. STATE. No. 1D08-2221. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 24, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Sabatino v. Brown

3 So. 3d 337 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 4, 2009

3 So.3d 337 (2009) SABATINO v. BROWN. No. 4D08-670. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 4, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

991 So. 2d 871 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 18, 2008

991 So.2d 871 (2008) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D08-2269. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 18, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Belated App.granted.

Johnson v. Brown

11 N.C. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 26, 1971

Gillikin v. Burbage, 263 N.C. 317 , 139 S.E. 2d 753 (1965). … Short v. Chapman, 261 N.C. 674 , 136 S.E. 2d 40 (1964) ; Hood v. Kennedy, 5 N.C. App. 203 , 167 S.E. 2d 874 (1969); Rogers v. Rogers, 2 N.C. App. 668 , 163 S.E. 2d 645 (1968).

Jankowsky v. Brown

177 A.D. 602 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1917

As stated in Snelling v. Yetter, No. 1 ( 25 App.

People v. Brown

382 Ill. App. 3d 1215 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 16, 2008

Dec. 769 PEOPLE v. BROWN. No. 2-06-0788. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. July 16, 2008. Affirmed.

Ennis v. Brown

3 So. 3d 1252 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 4, 2009

3 So.3d 1252 (2009) ENNIS v. BROWN. No. 2D08-4495. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 4, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Medina v. Brown

172 Cal. App. 2d 208 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1959

Co. v. Rogers, 83 Cal. 10 [ 23 P. 196 , 17 Am.St.Rep. 209 ].) … (Marangi v. Domenici, 161 Cal.App. *212 2d 552 [ 326 P.2d 527 ].) The use may be exclusive in the required sense even though' it is participated in by the owner of the servient tenement. (Marangi v. Domenici, supra.)

Yurick v. Commonwealth

43 Pa. Commw. 248 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1979

The grant of a continuance is a matter of administrative discretion of the Board which decision will not be disturbed unless there is an abuse of discretion. Benford v. Real Estate Commission, 8 Pa. … See Boyd v. State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 620 , 317 A.2d 307 (1974).

Brown v. MASTOS

990 So. 2d 1071 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 12, 2008

990 So.2d 1071 (2008) BROWN v. MASTOS. No. 3D08-2217. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 12, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Mand.denied.

Brown v. McClendon

56 Tex. Civ. App. 551 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1909

Owens v. Brown

864 So. 2d 640 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 2003

Brown confirmed that Owens’ vehicle struck the driver’s door. Discussion The trier of fact is owed great deference in its allocation of fault and may not be reversed unless clearly wrong. Clement v. … Clement, supra; Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury, 95-1100 (La.01/16/96), 666 So.2d 612 ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So.2d 332 (La.1977).

Brown v. State

36 Ala. App. 345 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1951

In Clark v. … Clark v. State, supra; Tribble v. State, 145 Ala. 23 , 40 So. 938 ; Tesney v. State, 77 Ala. 33 . Under the conflicting evidence in the case the general affirmative charge was properly refused.

Brown v. State

654 So. 2d 272 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 1, 1995

See Gibbs v. State, 604 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Since the trial court’s attachments do not refute appellant’s claim, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings according to rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.

Commonwealth v. Brown

46 Mass. App. Ct. 279 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 4, 1999

Commonwealth v. Brown, 413 Mass. 693, 695-696 (1992). Calls not unlike the present have qualified for admission in Commonwealth v. Giguere, 420 Mass. 226, 233-234 (1995), and Commonwealth v. Smith, 35 Mass. App. … The defendant, however, proposes variant interpretations or conclusions, (a) The judge, he says, could have chosen to sentence him to a house of correction, and under parole board regulations he would then become eligible

Brown v. State

15 Ga. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 1, 1914

State v. Trenary-Brown

311 Or. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 2021

SABRINA ANN TRENARY-BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. … Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. 580 State v. Trenary-Brown KAMINS, J. Reversed and remanded.

People v. Brown

134 A.D.2d 438 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1987

They did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment for these crimes or for this defendant (see, People v Vasquez, 104 AD2d 1012 ). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.