Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.29s

  • Brown v. Weld

    5 Kan. App. 341 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Mar 22, 1897

    Our Supreme Court, in the case of Hafer v. … The Supreme Court, in support of this conclusion in the case of Hafer v. Hafer, cited above, cites the case of Jacobs et al. v. Jacobs et al., 42 Iowa, 600 , with approval.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    11 So. 3d 361 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 8, 2009

    11 So.3d 361 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D08-3875. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 8, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    205 A.D.2d 854 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1994

    court may correct by the exercise of its inherent powers (see, Matter of Kisloff v Covington, supra; People v Wright, supra; People v Minaya, 54 NY2d 360, 364 , cert denied 455 US 1024 ). … Davidson v Kelly, 193 AD2d 1140, 1141 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    1 So. 3d 187 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 12, 2009

    1 So.3d 187 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D04-2348. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 12, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Mandate recalled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    953 N.E.2d 679 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2011

    953 N.E.2d 679 (2011) BROWN v. STATE. No. 34A02-1010-MI-1145. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 6, 2011. BARNES, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Reversed and Remanded. ROBB, C.J., concurs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    381 S.W.3d 175 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 23, 2011

    CR2008-2319, Brown was charged with two counts of second-degree domestic battery. The two counts named Robert Brown and Michael Brown, appellant’s ^brothers, as the victims. … Green v. State, 79 Ark. App. 297 , 87 S.W.3d 814 (2002).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    212 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2007

    Dept. v. … See, e.g., State v. Sanders, 202 Or App 672 , 126 P3d 1260 (2005), rev allowed, 340 Or 359 (2006); State v. Stickney, 195 Or App 155 , 97 P3d 1205 (2004), rev den, 338 Or 17 (2005); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Brown

    716 N.E.2d 1030 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

    Co. of Indiana v. Nuckolls, 682 N.E.2d 534, 537 (Ind.1997). … Schnell v. Hayes, 710 N.E.2d 208, 210 (Ind.Ct.App.1999).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pagan v. Brown

    176 A.D.2d 690 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1991

    (See, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 240.) Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Glover

    158 Mo. App. 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1911

    In consideration of one dollar this day paid to me, and services rendered me by him, including board.” … [Lietman’s Estate v. Lietman, 149 Mo. 112 , 50 S. W. 307 .] But that situation, so far as appears by this record, has not arisen.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    97 Mich. App. 606 · Michigan Court of Appeals · May 20, 1980

    See People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978). The Supreme Court has modified the Chamblis rule in cases where the motivating policies of the rule are not offended. … People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lanier

    60 N.C. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1983

    Vernon v. Crist, supra. … Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C. App. 264 , 276 S.E. 2d 718 (1981). The duty of a person signing a contract to read the contract is not absolute. Sexton v. Lilley, 4 N.C. App. 606 , 167 S.E. 2d 467 (1969).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    998 So. 2d 608 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 16, 2009

    998 So.2d 608 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 1D07-3996. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 16, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laird v. Brown

    210 S.W.2d 276 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 1948

    Gause, Tex.Com.App., 56 S.W.2d 855 ; Porter v. … Shearer v. Porter, 8 Cir., 155 F.2d 77 to 82.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cowell

    19 So. 3d 1171 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 20, 2009

    Brown appeals the trial court’s sua sponte dismissal of his petition for annulment for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction. … Lowe v. Lowe, 948 So.2d 836, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Nissen v. Cortez Moreno, 10 So.3d 1110, 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). We reverse. Appellant, a resident of Duval County, Florida, married Daucia T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    570 So. 2d 1070 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 29, 1990

    The trial judge sentenced Brown for both offenses. The combined scoresheet included points for “legal constraint.” It placed Brown in the community control or 12 to 30 months incarceration bracket. … Smith v. State, 566 So.2d 57 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also State v. Simpson, 554 So.2d 506 (Fla.1989); Jones v. State, 553 So.2d 702 (Fla.1989); State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988); Tillman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    443 So. 2d 309 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 27, 1983

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Billingsley v. Brown

    569 N.E.2d 687 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1991

    In order to recover for negligence, Billingsley must show Brown breached a duty owed to him that proximately caused Billingsley's injuries. See Estate of Ogden v. … Robinson v. Kinnick (1989), Ind.App., 548 N.E.2d 1167, 1168 , trans. denied. Billings-ley fails to establish Brown owed any duty to him under the circumstances.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    751 So. 2d 1155 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Sep 7, 1999

    In United States v. … Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 620 (Miss.1985). Brown concedes that his sentence is within the statutory limits.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    281 A.D.2d 340 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2001

    Since defendant’s speedy trial motion was based entirely on CPL 30.30, a ground waived by defendant’s guilty plea, he failed to preserve his constitutional speedy trial claim (People v Rowe, 244 AD2d 295 , lv denied 91 NY2d … Were we to review this claim, we would find, after balancing the factors set forth in People v Taranovich ( 37 NY2d 442 ), that defendant was not entitled to dismissal of the indictment.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.