Case law

Brown v. Dunbar

29 So. 2d 357 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1947

defendants contend that they are not liable to plaintiff for three principal reasons: first, because he was not a passenger at the time he was injured, as he had not up to that time indicated to the driver his intention of boarding … He was injured when he was in the act of getting in the taxicab, a public conveyance, and was attempting to board the conveyance at a place where the cab had stopped to pick up another passenger. [1] On the second point,

Brown v. State

11 Fla. L. Weekly 1861 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 27, 1986

State v. … Vera v.

People v. Brown

54 A.D.3d 621 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 23, 2008

People v. Brown

52 A.D.3d 230 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 3, 2008

Brown v. State

14 So. 3d 1011 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 8, 2009

14 So.3d 1011 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D09-551. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 8, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

State v. Brown

4 La.App. 3 Cir. 0184 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2004

In State v. … However, in State v.

People v. Brown

199 A.D.2d 11 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 1993

In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the ruling since the jury was apprised of its contents (People v Adams, 72 AD2d 156, 161 , affd 53 NY2d 1 , cert denied 454 US 854 ). … The court delivered an adverse inference charge against the People, eliminating thereby any possibility of prejudice to the defendant (see, People v Franco, 189 AD2d 589 , lv denied 81 NY2d 970 ).

Brown v. State

225 Ga. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 5, 1997

The record shows that a detective administered Brown the warnings required under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. … See Frymyer v. State, 179 Ga. App. 391, 392 (1) ( 346 SE2d 573 ) (1986). 3. The trial court properly denied Brown’s motion for mistrial.

State v. Brown

138 Wash. App. 1059 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 4, 2007

People v. Brown

386 Ill. App. 3d 1123 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 4, 2009

App.3d 1123 PEOPLE v. BROWN. No. 2-08-0224. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. February 4, 2009. Dismissed.

Brown v. State

129 Ga. App. 713 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 5, 1973

The first two grounds of his motion have been decided adversely to defendant in David v. Pope, 128 Ga. App. 791 ( 197 SE2d 861 ). See also Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U. S. 432 (77 SC 408, 1 LE2d 448); Schmerber v. … Brown, Jr. Murder. Mr. Hugh Patrick, Tpr. [Trooper], C. A. Lewis, True.” In the case of Switzer v. State, 7 Ga.

Brown v. State

13 So. 3d 64 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 15, 2009

13 So.3d 64 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 4D09-1472. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 15, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

State v. Brown

129 Wash. App. 1004 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 18, 2005

People v. Brown

190 A.D.2d 742 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1993

Garcia-Perez v United States, 454 US 839 ). … We have examined the defendant’s remaining argument and find it to be unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Kryminski, 154 AD2d 549 ). Mangano, P.

Brown v. State

150 Ga. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 13, 1979

Brown appeals his conviction of rape, enumerating eight alleged errors. Enumerations 1 and 2 are not supported by the evidence and are without merit. … She took the police officer to the scene where she pointed out tissues and debris from Brown’s car, and identified those items in court. Under the circumstances, there is no merit in this enumeration of error. Calfee v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

200 Ky. 313 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Oct 2, 1923

through any other means, for it is not shown that the wounds inflicted by Brown were fatal or that the deceased came to his death thereby. … The evidence clearly show® that Brown and deceased had been quarreling more or less for two days. As a consequence Brown armed himself and went to the hall where he must have known deceased would be.

Brown v. Blake

212 So. 2d 47 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 20, 1968

Brown also moved to dissolve the temporary injunction. The motion to dismiss was denied, hence this appeal. The primary point on appeal goes to the question of jurisdiction. Appellant relies upon one case, Newton v. … Hook v. Hoffman (1915) 16 Ariz. 540 , 147 P. 722 ; Patterson v. Farmington Street R. Co. (1904) 76 Conn. 628 , 57 A. 853 ; Andrews v. Guayaquil & Q. R.

State v. Brown

664 S.E.2d 666 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 8, 2008

664 S.E.2d 666 (2008) STATE v. BROWN. No. COA08-16. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed August 19, 2008. Certification Date September 8, 2008. Case reported without published opinion. No error.

Jamison v. Brown

158 Cal. App. 2d 27 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1958

Furthermore, as is stated in Sternberg v. … In Golden State Glass Corp. v.

Brown v. State

11 So. 3d 955 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 20, 2009

11 So.3d 955 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D09-862. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 20, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.