Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

5.81s

  • People v. Brown

    234 A.D.2d 15 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 1996

    "[M]uch weight must be accorded the determination of the suppression court with its peculiar advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses” (People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 , 761), and the court was clearly warranted in … Goins, 73 NY2d 989 , with People v Brown, 67 NY2d 555 , cert denied 479 US 1093 ), and the People offered to make the witness available for further cross-examination, which the defense refused.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Grady v. Brown

    180 Md. App. 367 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 30, 2008

    Co. v. … Sullivan, 231 Md. 580, 583 , 191 A.2d 564, 565 (1963) (quoting Henderson v. Brown, 214 Md. 463, 472 , 135 A.2d 881, 886 (1957)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    70 A.D.3d 407 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 2010

    People v Pearson, 67 AD3d 600 [2009] [court has authority to make immediate retraction of discharge of jury]). … Velasquez, 1 NY3d 44, 48 [2003]; People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772 [1983]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Weld

    5 Kan. App. 341 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Mar 22, 1897

    Our Supreme Court, in the case of Hafer v. … The Supreme Court, in support of this conclusion in the case of Hafer v. Hafer, cited above, cites the case of Jacobs et al. v. Jacobs et al., 42 Iowa, 600 , with approval.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    74 Mass. App. Ct. 75 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 15, 2009

    In Commonwealth v. … Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 (1948) (“canon in favor of strict construction [of criminal statutes] is not an inexorable command to override common sense and evident statutory purpose”).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    18 So. 3d 543 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 22, 2009

    18 So.3d 543 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 5D09-898. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. September 22, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McNeil

    18 So. 3d 530 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 18, 2009

    18 So.3d 530 (2009) BROWN v. McNEIL. No. 1D09-3355. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 18, 2009. Decision without published opinion Certiorari dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    184 N.C. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2007

    Antonio Brown (defendant) was convicted by a jury of felony larceny on 16 August 2005 and was sentenced to serve fifteen to eighteen months in prison. It is from this conviction that he appeals. … State v. Cathey, 162 N.C. App. 350, 353-54 , 590 S.E.2d 408, 410 (2004); see, e.g., State v. Thompson, 6 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    953 N.E.2d 679 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2011

    953 N.E.2d 679 (2011) BROWN v. STATE. No. 34A02-1010-MI-1145. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 6, 2011. BARNES, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Reversed and Remanded. ROBB, C.J., concurs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    404 So. 2d 805 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 7, 1981

    The state challenges the trial court’s dismissal of charges against appellee, James Brown, on the ground that he had twice been placed in jeopardy for the same offense. … In State v. Beamon, 298 So.2d 376, 379-80 (Fla. 1974), the supreme court enumerated the elements of former jeopardy.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    12 So. 3d 232 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 2, 2009

    12 So.3d 232 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D09-1410. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 2, 2009. Decision without published opinion Habeas Corpus denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    224 Ga. App. 241 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 14, 1997

    Assuming without deciding that Brown was not the man who grabbed the victim, the record shows that, in any event, he acted as a lookout and warned his brother of the husband’s gun. See Thompson v. State, 210 Ga. … Because a rational trier of fact could have found each of the essential elements of the offenses charged, the denial of Brown’s motions for directed verdict and new trial was appropriate. Lankford v. State, 204 Ga.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    270 Ga. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 10, 2005

    Dickerson v. State, 241 Ga. App. 593, 594 (1) ( 526 SE2d 443 ) (1999), aff'd on other grounds, State v. Dickerson, 273 Ga. 408 ( 542 SE2d 487 ) (2001). 4 Id., citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U. … S. 213 (103 SC 2317, 76 LE2d 527) (1983), and State v. Stephens, 252 Ga. 181, 182 ( 311 SE2d 823 ) (1984). 5 See Dickerson, supra. 6 OCGA § 17-5-30 (b). 7 See Villegas v. State, 253 Ga.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    20 So. 3d 857 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 9, 2009

    20 So.3d 857 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D09-1906. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 9, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. White

    29 So. 2d 193 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1947

    Pearl Brown, a resident of Caddo Parish, Louisiana." … In fact, this Court has held (Brown v. Succession of Laing, La. App., 26 So.2d 34 ) that the very claim herein sued upon has been barred as against the Succession of Mrs. Laing by a prescription of one year.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    443 So. 2d 309 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 27, 1983

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    751 So. 2d 1155 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Sep 7, 1999

    In United States v. … Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612, 620 (Miss.1985). Brown concedes that his sentence is within the statutory limits.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    281 A.D.2d 340 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2001

    Since defendant’s speedy trial motion was based entirely on CPL 30.30, a ground waived by defendant’s guilty plea, he failed to preserve his constitutional speedy trial claim (People v Rowe, 244 AD2d 295 , lv denied 91 NY2d … Were we to review this claim, we would find, after balancing the factors set forth in People v Taranovich ( 37 NY2d 442 ), that defendant was not entitled to dismissal of the indictment.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    7 So. 3d 1103 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 1, 2009

    7 So.3d 1103 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D07-4747. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 1, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rodes

    132 So. 2d 304 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 11, 1961

    Benson v. … Clark v. Grey, 101 Fla. 1058 , 132 So. 832 ; United States v. Boyd, C.C., 45 F. 851 , text 855; State v. Clark, 29 N.J.L., 96 .’ ” See also Shaffran v. Holness, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 35 ; and Jones v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.