Case law

Brown v. State

725 So. 2d 1164 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 16, 1998

BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 96-04163 District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 16, 1998. Scott L. Robbins, Tampa, for Appellant. *1165 Robert A. … See Rolling, 695 So.2d at 290 ; see also United States v.

Muzio v. Brown

302 A.D.2d 505 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 18, 2003

Brown, Sagamore In Pine Hollow, Ltd., and Sagamore Auto Body, Inc., and the defendants Frank Verderber and Pine Lane Association, Inc., to dismiss the complaint, to impose a sanction on the plaintiffs, and for an award of … As a matter of law, damages are not recoverable for mental or emotional distress caused by destruction of personal property (see Probst v Cacoulidis, 295 AD2d 331, 332 [2002]).

State v. Brown

195 N.C. App. 460 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2009

Brown v. State

26 So. 3d 591 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 20, 2010

26 So.3d 591 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D09-1508. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 20, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Brown v. State

635 S.W.2d 211 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 1982

See Baker v. State, 552 S.W.2d 818 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Colburn v. State, 501 S.W.2d 680 (Tex.Cr.App.1973). … Rogers v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 239 , 333 S.W.2d 383, 385 (1960); Wheat v. State, 442 S.W.2d 363 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Garay v. State, 389 S.W.2d 952 (Tex.Cr.App.1965).

People v. Brown

12 A.D.3d 378 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 2004

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … Thus, he was not entitled to a jury trial to determine the facts of his prior felony convictions (see People v Rice, 285 AD2d 617 [2001]; see also People v Reddick, 1 AD3d 385 [2003]; People v Lebron, 293 AD2d 689 [2002])

Brown v. State

301 So. 2d 154 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 15, 1974

See Brown v. State, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 689 ; Yanks v. State, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 401 ; Jenkins v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 886 ; Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 223 .

State v. Brown

6 So. 3d 966 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 2009

. |, The Defendant, Francis Brown, appeals his conviction for second degree murder. … In State v.

Mendenhall v. Brown

252 S.W. 241 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1923

of seed to Mendenhall, free on board the cars at destination, which was St. … Wolf v. Pittman (Tex. Civ. App.) 247 S. W. 322 ; Pittman v. Bag Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 247 S. W. 324 .

Mitchel v. Brown

78 Cal. App. 2d 58 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1947

On appeal (Mitchel v. … (California Packing Corp. v. Larsen, 187 Cal. 610 [ 203 P. 102 ]; Martin v. Stone, 15 Cal.App. 174 [ 113 P. 706 ]; Bridges v. Price, 95 Cal.App. 394 [ 273 P. 72 ].)

People v. Brown

187 A.D.2d 872 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 25, 1992

Our holding in People v Marzano ( 147 AD2d 752 ) requires reversal of the second degree assault conviction on these facts. … Stacey, 173 AD2d 960, 961 , lv denied 79 NY2d 832 ; *873 see also, People v Ware, 173 AD2d 903, 903-904 ; People v Laurey, 163 AD2d 742, 743 , lv denied 76 NY2d 941 ).

Banks v. Brown

876 N.E.2d 335 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2007

We interpret this language as a suit against the employees in them official capacities, see Pedraza v. City of East Chicago, 746 N.E.2d 94, 100 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), which is a suit against the State, see Niksich v. … City of Hammond v. Conley, 498 N.E.2d 48, 53 (Ind.Ct.App.1986).

Massie v. Brown

9 Wash. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 27, 1973

As is said in Mann v. County of Maricopa, 104 Ariz. 561, 564 , 456 P.2d 931 (1969) quoting from Smith v. … State, 78 Wn.2d 164 , 469 P.2d 909 (1970); Seattle v. Hill, 72 Wn.2d 786 , 435 P.2d 692 (1967)) action. For application of the doctrine in other states see Mann v. County of Maricopa, supra; Powers v.

People v. Brown

131 Ill. App. 2d 992 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 30, 1971

Brown v. State

760 So. 2d 1113 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 5, 2000

See Nichols v. State, 711 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Eblin v. State, 677 So.2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). … However, we find that Brown’s appeal falls within the window period discussed in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000).

Brown v. State

25 So. 3d 567 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 30, 2009

25 So.3d 567 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D09-3343. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 30, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Habeas Corpus granted.

Wheeler v. Brown

47 Cal. App. 2d 239 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 9, 1941

(Clary v. Lindley, 30 Cal. App. (2d) 571 [ 86 Pac. (2d) 920 ].) … (Mar Shee v. Maryland Assur. Corp., 190 Cal. 1, 9 [ 210 Pac. 269 ].)

Brown v. Hotard

428 So. 2d 505 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1983

Palmer v. Asaff, 297 So.2d 487 (La.App. 2d Cir.1974); Johnson v. H.W. Parson Motors, Inc., 231 So.2d 73 (La.App. 1st Cir.1970); Hanna Investments, Inc. v. Stovall, 171 So.2d 678 (La.App. 2d Cir.1965). … Brown agreed.

Stahel v. Brown

422 So. 2d 1291 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1982

Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978). The plaintiff argues that a curator ad hoc should be appointed to view her records to determine the possibility of inheritance rights. In Prentice v. … See Kirsch v. Parker, 383 So.2d 384 (La.1980).

Brown v. English

115 A.D. 884 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1906