Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.90s

  • Brown v. State

    660 So. 2d 235 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 13, 1995

    The appellant, Tony Ray Brown, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty in 1983 to assault in the second degree. … State v. Ackerman , [Ms. CR-93-1679, August 4, 1994] ___ So.2d ___, ___ (Ala.Cr.App. 1994). The appellant must be given an opportunity to plead guilty or not guilty to the original charge.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    935 So. 2d 211 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 5, 2006

    . |¡,The defendant, William Brown, was charged by grand jury indictment with one count of first degree murder, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30, and pled not guilty. … State v. Kang, 2002-2812, p. 6 (La.10/21/03), 859 So.2d 649, 653-54 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    14 Ga. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 30, 1914

    However, the precise point was ruled on in McCullough v. State, 10 Ga. App. 403 ( 73 S. E. 546 ), and that ruling is conclusive.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Page

    39 Mich. App. 50 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1972

    Brown’s verdict was for $2,000; Mrs. Brown’s, $500. … Nagy v McEachern, 28 Mich App 439 (1970); Davidson v Baker-Vander Veen Construction Co, 35 Mich App 293 (1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    45 Ohio App. 2d 76 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1975

    The facts in the instant case are similar to the facts in United States v. Colbert (C. A. 5), 474 F. 2d 174 , where the court found the abandonment of certain briefcases. … put the bag down to secure identification for the police officers, but this slight variation in the facts of the two cases does not vary the conclusion, under the totality of the facts in each case, that both Colbert and Brown

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    262 A.D.2d 328 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1999

    the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Ortiz, 76 NY2d 446, 449 ; People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 75 , cert denied 439 US 935 ; People v Scott, 134 AD2d 379, 380 ). … The defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant his request for a missing witness inference (see, People v Kitching, 78 NY2d 532 ; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Marino v. Brown

    225 A.D.2d 529 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 1996

    While "a court, in its discretion, may grant renewal upon facts known to the moving party at the time of the original motion” (Karlin v Bridges, 172 AD2d 644, 645 ; see, Oremland v Miller Minutemen Constr. … and thereafter sought to move again on a different legal argument merely because he was unsuccessful upon the original application” (Foley v Roche, supra, at 568 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    44 So. 3d 600 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 29, 2010

    44 So.3d 600 (2010) Nathaniel BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D10-0086. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 29, 2010. Nathaniel Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    25 So. 3d 564 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 28, 2009

    25 So.3d 564 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D09-4734. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 28, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Belated Appeal granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    27 So. 3d 39 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 27, 2010

    27 So.3d 39 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 4D08-4061. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 27, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paschall v. Brown

    133 S.W. 509 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 8, 1910

    Mass v. Bromberg, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 145 , 66 S. W. 468 ; Aycock v. Kimbrough, 71 Tex. 330 , 12 S. W. 71 , 10 Am. St. Rep. 745 . The land not being Mrs. Paschall’s separate estate, D. A. … Pas-chall died before the trial, but had testified at a former trial, and his testimony then given was attempted to be reproduced by the plaintiff, Brown, and the defendant Mrs. Paschall. The former testified that D. A.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hardy v. Brown

    345 So. 2d 971 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1977

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    25 So. 3d 569 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 23, 2009

    25 So.3d 569 (2009) BROWN v. STATE. No. 4D09-2241. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 23, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gaylord v. Brown

    128 A.D. 340 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 1908

    Brown & co., who are defendants in this action; that the firm -had become interested in certain gold and - copper, lands in the Republic of Santo Domingo and caused the defendant, the San Domingo Gold and Copper Company to … Gaylord, and that this defendant is ready and willing, upon the receipt of the proper releases, authorizations, assignment or transfer of said shares of stock from the said Brown & Co. and Alice B.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Horan v. Brown

    43 A.D.3d 608 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 9, 2007

    v Spencer, 36 NY2d 35, 43-51 [1974]; Wheeler v Sears Roebuck & Co., 37 AD3d 710, 711 [2007]; Wallace v Pacelli, 221 AD2d 778 [1995]; Hlavinka v Slovak Sky Bungalow Colony, 203 AD2d 855, 856 [1994]). … Spencer, supra at 48 [citation omitted]; see Hoppe v Hoppe, 281 AD2d 595 [2001]; Cantave v Peterson, 266 AD2d 492, 493 [1999]; Hlavinka v Slovak Sky Bungalow Colony, supra at 856-857).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    916 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1996

    State v. Walton, 796 S.W.2d 374, 378 (Mo. banc 1990); State v. Becton, 841 S.W.2d 315, 319 (Mo.App.E.D.1992). … Brown sought to inject the possibility another man may have committed the robbery. The trial court has broad discretion in admitting or excluding evidence. State v. Clark, 859 S.W.2d 782, 787 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dale

    395 S.W.2d 677 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 27, 1965

    Casualty Underwriters v. Rhone, 134 Tex. 50 , 132 S.W.2d 97; Ford v. Carpenter, 147 Tex. 447 , 216 S.W.2d 558 ; Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Craik, 162 Tex. 260 , 346 S.W.2d 830 ; Traywick v. … Brown. *681 The testimony shows the driveway was 10 feet, 6 inches wide. Under the rule announced in the quote from Prewitt v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    32 So. 3d 636 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 6, 2010

    32 So.3d 636 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 5D09-4632. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 6, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    7 Or. App. 5 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 1971

    Concerning defendant’s first assignment, his claim of double jeopardy, we held,-pursuant to prior holdings of the Oregon Supreme Court, in State v. … State v. Romero, 1 Or App 217 , 461 P2d 70 (1969); State v. Holbert, 1 Or App 552 , 464 P2d 834 (1970). See also, State v. Steffes, 2 Or App 163, 465 P2d 905 , Sup Ct review denied (1970).

    Reversed on other grounds by State v. Brown, 262 Or. 442 (1972)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown Suber

    2021 Ohio 2291 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2021

    [Cite as State v. Brown Suber, 2021-Ohio-2291.] … SUBER AKA DONNIE : SUBER-BROWN AKA DONNIE BROWN- SUBER, : Appellant.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.