Case law

Brown v. Gatewood

150 S.W. 950 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1911

Vansickle v. Watson (Sup.) 123 S.W. 112 . … Co. v.

State v. Brown

804 S.W.2d 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1991

Brown was arrested for driving while revoked and while intoxicated. Brown refused to take the proffered breathalyzer. … Brown did request a blood alcohol test but was not given one. This issue has not been preserved for appeal as it was not set out by appellant in his motion for a new trial. See State v.

State v. Brown

2009 La.App. 4 Cir. 0657 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 2009

|rThe State filed a bill of information charging Michael Brown with possession with intent to distribute heroin and possession of cocaine. … See State v. Green, 2002-1022 (La.12/4/02), 831 So.2d 962 ; State v. Johnson, 408 So.2d 1280, 1283 (La.1982); State v. Rando, 2003-0073 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/9/03) , 848 So.2d 19 .

Brown v. Vining

334 So. 2d 647 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 11, 1976

BROWN, Individually and As Trustee, Appellant, v. J. Bruce VINING, Appellee. No. 75-431. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 11, 1976. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1976. *648 Norman F. … Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 50 .

People v. Brown

227 A.D.2d 237 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 16, 1996

Sinistaj, 67 NY2d 236, 239 ; People v Sigismundi, 222 AD2d 382, 383 ). … Although the hearing court found this period to be includable, it was, in fact, excludable as time expended for motion practice (see, People v Buong Sai, 223 AD2d 439 -440; People v Bissereth, 194 AD2d 317 , lv denied 82

Brown v. Dilworth

331 So. 2d 379 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 4, 1976

331 So.2d 379 (1976) David BROWN, a Minor, by and through His Parents, Legal Guardians and Next Friends, et al., Appellants, v. Helen R. DILWORTH et al., Appellees. Helen R. DILWORTH, Appellant, v. … David Brown et al., Appellees. CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. David BROWN et al., Appellees. Nos. 75-748, 75-1091, 75-1030 and 75-1058. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Brown v. Scherck

393 S.W.2d 172 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 29, 1965

In Williams v. … Warren School District [No. 28] v. Stocker, 42 N.J.L. 115 ; Buchner v. Chicago, M. & N. W. Ry. Co., 60 Wis. 264 , 19 N.W. 57 ; Brown v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 102 Wis. 137 , 77 N.W. 748 , 78 N.W. 771 , 44 L.R.A. 586 .

People v. Brown

215 A.D.2d 772 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 1995

The hearing court, which saw and heard the witnesses, found that the lineup was not suggestive (see, e.g., People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 ), and we find no reason on this record to disturb its determination.

Brown v. State

781 So. 2d 484 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 21, 2001

781 So.2d 484 (2001) Horace BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D01-458. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 21, 2001. *485 Horace Brown, Daytona Beach, pro se. … See Dunenas v. Moore, 762 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Mortimer v.

State v. Brown

624 S.W.2d 543 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1981

But the Supreme Court held in State v. … State v. Stamps, 569 S.W.2d 762, 766 (Mo.App.1978). Among the issues here were whether defendant’s possession of the marihuana was intentional and conscious. State v. Burns, 457 S.W.2d 721, 725 (Mo.1970); State v.

Brown v. State

44 So. 3d 593 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 25, 2010

44 So.3d 593 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 3D10-1844. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 25, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Brown v. Orndorff

309 S.C. 320 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Aug 10, 1992

We first note that there is no evidence in the record that Brown ever raised this argument before the trial judge and this issue therefore is not properly preserved. See Roche v. S.C. … Blackwell v. Paccar, Inc., 302 S.C. 294 , 395 S.E. (2d) 736 (Ct. App. 1990).

McClanahan v. Brown

157 Ky. 450 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Feb 17, 1914

Brown Twenty Seven & ^ Dollars (27.09-100) amount of taxes with cost, &e., of Rebecca Brown for years 1874, 1875 and 1876 for which a tract of land of Rebecca Brown’s was sold by sheriff of Bracken Co. “George B. … Brown who was an idiot as long as she lived.

Brown v. Gauss

95 N.Y.S. 538 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Oct 27, 1905

If the rule applied in McMann v. Brown, 92 App. Div. 249 , 87 N. Y. Supp. 38 , is to have any effect, the papers before us require its application.

Brown v. State

886 N.E.2d 654 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 23, 2008

886 N.E.2d 654 (2008) BROWN v. STATE. No. 84A04-0711-CR-644. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 23, 2008. ROBB, J. Disposition of case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision. Affirmed and Remanded. BAKER, C.J. Concurs.

Madry v. Brown

50 So. 3d 1139 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 6, 2011

50 So.3d 1139 (2011) MADRY v. BROWN. No. 1D10-4228. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 6, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Brown v. State

50 So. 3d 1138 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 6, 2011

50 So.3d 1138 (2011) BROWN v. STATE. No. 1D09-5697. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 6, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Brown v. State

636 S.W.2d 867 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 28, 1982

Hollins v. State, 571 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). In Hollins the convicting court was not designated in the enhancement paragraph. … Hall v. State, 619 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.Cr.App.1980) and the cases cited therein. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

State v. Brown

927 N.E.2d 968 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2010

927 N.E.2d 968 (2010) STATE v. BROWN. No. 02A05-1001-CR-44. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 4, 2010. CRONE, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed. BAKER, C.J., concurs. DARDEN, J., concurs.

Harris v. Brown

218 S.W.3d 630 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2007

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). A party requesting specific performance of a settlement agreement has the burden of proving the agreement by clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence. Randall v.