Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.43s
17 A.D.3d 283 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 28, 2005
The court properly denied defendant’s application made pursuant to Batson v Kentucky ( 476 US 79 [1986]). … The record establishes that defendant consented to submis *285 sion of statutory materials to the deliberating jury pursuant to CPL 310.30 (see People v Brown, 90 NY2d 872, 874 [1997]; People v Spruill, 245 AD2d 534 [1997
Cited 3 timesPublished147 Wash. App. 1005 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 20, 2008
Cited 2 timesPublished990 A.2d 38 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2009
990 A.2d 38 (2009) COM. v. WILLIE BROWN. No. 343 MDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. December 17, 2009. Affirmed, Reversed and Remanded.
Cited 0 timesPublished216 Cal. App. 3d 596 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1989
Frank Edward Brown appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of vehicular manslaughter (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. … None of the changes affect the case at bench. 2 People v.
Cited 12 timesPublished45 So. 2d 912 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1950
Such was the ruling of this Court in the case of Henderson v. Graham, 199 So. 439 . We next consider that portion of the petition seeking to nullify the default jactitory judgment. … Earl Mayfield v. J. Herman Brown, et al.’ No. 18181 on the docket of this court, be annulled and decreed void; and for all orders necessary and for general and equitable relief.” (Italics by the Court).
Cited 6 timesPublished248 A.D.2d 145 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 1998
the jury specifically, as requested, that defendant’s mere presence at the scene was insufficient to convict her under an acting in concert theory, since the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standards (see, People v
Cited 2 timesPublished38 Mich. App. 69 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1972
Tukel [defendant Brown’s counsel]: Which statute ? … Barber v Page, supra; People v Zabijak, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished300 A.D.2d 314 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 2002
of the case’ ” (People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 566 , quoting People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 714 ). … ; People v Lindo, 167 AD2d 558, 559 ).
Cited 8 timesPublished802 So. 2d 434 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 12, 2001
802 So.2d 434 (2001) Jacqueline Cooper BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D00-886. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 12, 2001. … We disagree and affirm on the authority of Raford v.
Cited 3 timesPublished983 P.2d 474 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1998
Brown cites Holloway v. … Brown, citing Tison v.
Cited 14 timesPublished84 Okla. Crim. 115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1947
In Jump v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 9 , 133 P. 2d 561 , this court held: “When an appeal in a misdemeanor case is not taken within the 60 days prescribed by the statute (Section 3192, O. S. 1931, 22 O. … See, also, Gunter v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 83 , 162 P. 231; Wilkerson v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 152 , 134 P. 2d 998 . Miller v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 112 , 144 P. 2d 120 .
Cited 5 timesPublished83 A.D.3d 1577 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2011
Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal does “not encompass the right to challenge the legality of the sentencing procedure on appeal” (People v Nicholson, 237 AD2d 973, 974 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 908 [1997]), … nor is preservation required to challenge the legality of a sentence (see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 56 [2000]).
Cited 1 timesPublished214 A.D.2d 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1995
Rivera, All AD2d 662; People v Wells, 144 AD2d 400 ; People v Jones, 138 AD2d 405 ). … Marilla, 1 NY2d 319; People v Mower, 144 AD2d 117 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished12 Mass. App. Ct. 988 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 11, 1981
Contrast Commonwealth v. Ennis, 1 Mass. App. … Commonwealth v. Stasiun, 349 Mass. 38,45 (1965); Commonwealth v. England, 350 Mass. 83,87-88 (1966); Commonwealth v. Benjamin, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 604, 617-618, 626-628 (1975). John F. Donahue for the defendant. William T.
Cited 6 timesPublished147 Wash. App. 1032 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 24, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublished981 A.2d 1014 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2009
981 A.2d 1014 (2009) UPLINGER v. BROWN. No. 631CD09. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. October 15, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished138 Cal. App. 3d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1982
{People v. Hitch, supra, 12 Cal.3d 641, 645 .) People v. … {United States v.
Cited 8 timesPublished11 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 26, 1971
Combs, 273 N.C. 462 , 160 S.E. 2d 308 ; Walston v. College, 258 N.C. 130 , 128 S.E. 2d 134 ; Brinson v. Kirby, 251 N.C. 73 , 110 S.E. 2d 482 ; Davis v. Vaughn, 243 N.C. 486 , 91 S.E. 2d 165 ; Honeycutt v. … Bank, 242 N.C. 734 , 89 S.E. 2d 598 ; Ingram v. Easley, 227 N.C. 442 , 42 S.E. 2d 624 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 217 N.C. 70 , 6 S.E. 2d 812 ; Caldwell v. Blount, 193 N.C. 560 , 137 S.E. 578 ; Best v.
Cited 6 timesPublished49 So. 3d 337 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 10, 2010
Appellant, Donald Ray Brown [“Brown”], filed in this Court an untimely notice of appeal in which he allegedly seeks review of a June 14, 2010, order denying his motion to vacate and set aside judgments and sentences. … The trial court concluded that Brown had failed to present any evidence that the order was actually rendered on a date later than June 4 and that Brown’s testimony was not credible.
Cited 0 timesPublished612 N.W.2d 104 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Feb 9, 2000
See United States v. Oates, 173 F.3d 651, 656 (8th Cir.1999); United States v. … .”); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 863 (10th Cir.1992); United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna