Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

1.43s

  • People v. Brown

    17 A.D.3d 283 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 28, 2005

    The court properly denied defendant’s application made pursuant to Batson v Kentucky ( 476 US 79 [1986]). … The record establishes that defendant consented to submis *285 sion of statutory materials to the deliberating jury pursuant to CPL 310.30 (see People v Brown, 90 NY2d 872, 874 [1997]; People v Spruill, 245 AD2d 534 [1997

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sexton v. Brown

    147 Wash. App. 1005 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 20, 2008

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Com. v. Brown

    990 A.2d 38 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2009

    990 A.2d 38 (2009) COM. v. WILLIE BROWN. No. 343 MDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. December 17, 2009. Affirmed, Reversed and Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    216 Cal. App. 3d 596 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1989

    Frank Edward Brown appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of vehicular manslaughter (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. … None of the changes affect the case at bench. 2 People v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mayfield

    45 So. 2d 912 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1950

    Such was the ruling of this Court in the case of Henderson v. Graham, 199 So. 439 . We next consider that portion of the petition seeking to nullify the default jactitory judgment. … Earl Mayfield v. J. Herman Brown, et al.’ No. 18181 on the docket of this court, be annulled and decreed void; and for all orders necessary and for general and equitable relief.” (Italics by the Court).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    248 A.D.2d 145 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 1998

    the jury specifically, as requested, that defendant’s mere presence at the scene was insufficient to convict her under an acting in concert theory, since the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standards (see, People v

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    38 Mich. App. 69 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1972

    Tukel [defendant Brown’s counsel]: Which statute ? … Barber v Page, supra; People v Zabijak, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    300 A.D.2d 314 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 2002

    of the case’ ” (People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 566 , quoting People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 714 ). … ; People v Lindo, 167 AD2d 558, 559 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    802 So. 2d 434 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 12, 2001

    802 So.2d 434 (2001) Jacqueline Cooper BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D00-886. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 12, 2001. … We disagree and affirm on the authority of Raford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    983 P.2d 474 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1998

    Brown cites Holloway v. … Brown, citing Tison v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    84 Okla. Crim. 115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1947

    In Jump v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 9 , 133 P. 2d 561 , this court held: “When an appeal in a misdemeanor case is not taken within the 60 days prescribed by the statute (Section 3192, O. S. 1931, 22 O. … See, also, Gunter v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 83 , 162 P. 231; Wilkerson v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 152 , 134 P. 2d 998 . Miller v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 112 , 144 P. 2d 120 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    83 A.D.3d 1577 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2011

    Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal does “not encompass the right to challenge the legality of the sentencing procedure on appeal” (People v Nicholson, 237 AD2d 973, 974 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 908 [1997]), … nor is preservation required to challenge the legality of a sentence (see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 56 [2000]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    214 A.D.2d 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1995

    Rivera, All AD2d 662; People v Wells, 144 AD2d 400 ; People v Jones, 138 AD2d 405 ). … Marilla, 1 NY2d 319; People v Mower, 144 AD2d 117 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    12 Mass. App. Ct. 988 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 11, 1981

    Contrast Commonwealth v. Ennis, 1 Mass. App. … Commonwealth v. Stasiun, 349 Mass. 38,45 (1965); Commonwealth v. England, 350 Mass. 83,87-88 (1966); Commonwealth v. Benjamin, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 604, 617-618, 626-628 (1975). John F. Donahue for the defendant. William T.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    147 Wash. App. 1032 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 24, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Uplinger v. Brown

    981 A.2d 1014 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2009

    981 A.2d 1014 (2009) UPLINGER v. BROWN. No. 631CD09. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. October 15, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    138 Cal. App. 3d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1982

    {People v. Hitch, supra, 12 Cal.3d 641, 645 .) People v. … {United States v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boone v. Brown

    11 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 26, 1971

    Combs, 273 N.C. 462 , 160 S.E. 2d 308 ; Walston v. College, 258 N.C. 130 , 128 S.E. 2d 134 ; Brinson v. Kirby, 251 N.C. 73 , 110 S.E. 2d 482 ; Davis v. Vaughn, 243 N.C. 486 , 91 S.E. 2d 165 ; Honeycutt v. … Bank, 242 N.C. 734 , 89 S.E. 2d 598 ; Ingram v. Easley, 227 N.C. 442 , 42 S.E. 2d 624 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 217 N.C. 70 , 6 S.E. 2d 812 ; Caldwell v. Blount, 193 N.C. 560 , 137 S.E. 578 ; Best v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    49 So. 3d 337 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 10, 2010

    Appellant, Donald Ray Brown [“Brown”], filed in this Court an untimely notice of appeal in which he allegedly seeks review of a June 14, 2010, order denying his motion to vacate and set aside judgments and sentences. … The trial court concluded that Brown had failed to present any evidence that the order was actually rendered on a date later than June 4 and that Brown’s testimony was not credible.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    612 N.W.2d 104 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Feb 9, 2000

    See United States v. Oates, 173 F.3d 651, 656 (8th Cir.1999); United States v. … .”); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 863 (10th Cir.1992); United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.