Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.01s

  • Brown v. Brown

    51 So. 3d 1134 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 15, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    141 S.W.3d 417 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2004

    Brooks Brown appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Lori Brown. He contends the evidence of his imputed income was insufficient to support the judgment ordering him to pay child support and maintenance.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    404 S.W.2d 286 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jan 28, 1966

    Rowe, Ky., 343 S.W.2d 140 (1961) ; Kelley v. Haas, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 687 (1953) ; Gibson v. Sellars, Ky., 252 S.W.2d 911 , 37 A.L.R.2d 1435 (1952); Bolen v. … Bartley v. Rowe, supra, at p. 142 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    35 So. 3d 26 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 6, 2008

    BROWN v. EMILY BROWN ET AL. No. 2080018. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. November 6, 2008. Decision of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeal Without Published Opinion Case reinstated.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    618 So. 2d 451 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1993

    Plaintiff, Joan Claire Brown, appeals a judgment of the trial court which dismissed her appeal for failure to post bond and pay costs. … Dusenberry v. Andrus, 510 So.2d 386 (La.App. 1 Cir.1987). Such is the case in the instant matter. See LSA-C.C.P. art. 2087. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2126 provides in pertinent part as follows: A.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    375 S.C. 48 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Aug 9, 2007

    Brown (Husband) alleges the family court erred in finding that unallocated support payments were non-deductible to him and non-taxable to Rita R. … See Delaney v. Delaney, 278 S.C. 55 , 293 S.E.2d 304 (1982); Beinor v. Beinor, 282 S.C. 181 , 318 S.E.2d 269 (1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    988 So. 2d 1053 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 25, 2008

    "In Deramus Hearing Aid Center, Inc. v. … Ex parte Brown , 963 So.2d 604 , 607-09 (Ala. 2007).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    264 S.W.2d 142 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 21, 1954

    Grooms v. Rust, 27 Tex. 231 ; Neyland v. Bendy, 69 Tex. 711 , 7 S.W. 497 ; Howard v. Zimpelman, Tex.Sup., 14 S.W. 59 ; Briscoe v. Bright’s Adm’r, Tex.Com.App., 231 S.W. 1082 ; Carl v. … Brown and wife, Nettie Brown, that the parents would convey these lands here in controversy to S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BROWN & BROWN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. Brown

    698 S.E.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2010

    698 S.E.2d 201 (2010) BROWN & BROWN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. BROWN. No. COA09-1665. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed July 20, 2010. Certification Date August 9, 2010. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Drury Chesterfield, Inc. v. Muehlheausler

    347 S.W.3d 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2011

    Savage v. State Tax Comm’n of Mo., 722 S.W.2d 72, 74 (Mo. banc 1986), quoting State ex rel. Cassilly v. Riney, 576 S.W.2d 325, 328 (Mo. banc 1979). … Friedman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown & Co.

    25 Tenn. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 5, 1941

    As held in McDonnell v. Amo, 162 Tenn., 36, 41 , 34 S. … See Mitchell v. Schulte et al., 142 Ark., 446, 222 S. W., 365, 369 , 10 A. L. R., 887, cited in Henderson et al. v. Watson et al, supra. And see, also, Fleming v. Greener, 173 Ind., 260 , 90 N. E., 72, 73 , 140 Am. St.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    473 So. 2d 851 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1984

    Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans [ 246 La. 893 ], 168 So.2d 595 (La.1964). … We are aware of the language used by this Court in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    604 So. 2d 932 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 21, 1992

    Buttermore v. Meyer, 559 So.2d 357, 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the order appealed is AFFIRMED. JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    171 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

    The 14 July 2004 order is the subject of a corollary appeal in Brown v. Brown, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (filed 5 July 2005, COA04-1189). … Because the 14 July 2004 order on contempt must be vacated for the reasons set forth in Brown v. Brown, ___ N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    732 So. 2d 1169 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 20, 1999

    Because prejudgment interest ordinarily pertains only from the date of loss, Argonaut Ins. v. … See Lake Placid Holding Co. v. Paparone, 414 So.2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Worldwide Development-Kendale Lakes West v. Lot Headquarters, 305 So.2d 271 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    790 So. 2d 453 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 1, 2001

    Beasley v. Beasley, 154 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). … Landingham v. Landingham, 685 So.2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    29 Conn. Super. Ct. 507 · Connecticut Superior Court · Apr 24, 1972

    In Arserio v. Arserio, 13 Conn. Sup. 146 , the court held that where there is no order of alimony, there is no order to be set aside or altered. … Howell v. Howell, 104 Cal. 45 ; Duvall v. Duvall, 215 Iowa 24 ; Bassett v. Bassett, 99 Wis. 344 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    100 Ind. App. 427 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1935

    Brown.” … See: Towles et al. v. McCurdy et al. (1904), 163 Ind. 12 , 71 N. E. 129 ; Taylor v. Fehler (1914), 181 Ind. 441 , 104 N. E. 22 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    69 S.W.3d 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2002

    Brown, Sr. (“Husband”) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dissolving his marriage to Lula M. Brown (“Wife”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    136 N.C. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2000

    The administratrix of the estate of Gladys Brown (“plaintiff”), Marsha T. … Russell (“Brown administratrix”), made a motion in the trial court to be substituted for plaintiff in the present action for equi *332 table distribution, a divorce from bed and board, alimony pendente lite and permanent

    Reversed on other grounds by Brown v. Brown, 353 N.C. 220 (2000)Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.