Case law

Brown v. Brown

30 S.W.2d 1110 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 11, 1930

Brown, should prevail. LI J In view of these several conditions, it is of importance to ascertain the intention of the parties in order that it may be determined when the sale took place. In Woods v. … Hickman v. Hickman (Tex. Civ. App.) 20 S.W.(2d) 1073 , and numerous authorities there cited. For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Brown v. Brown

884 S.W.2d 371 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1994

Brown (“James”) 1 appeals from a decree dissolving his 14-year marriage to Phyllis I. Brown (“Phyllis”). … Brown fully participated in the trial. He didn’t appear to have any memory loss.

Brown v. Brown

592 So. 2d 325 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 3, 1992

However, the correct construction and application of this section in a dissolution proceeding is set forth in Carroll v. … Goedmakers v. Goedmakers, 520 So.2d 575 (Fla.1988); Beggs v. Beggs, 570 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Rakusin v. Rakusirt, 569 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Crawford v. Crawford, 415 So.2d 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

State v. Trager

158 Or. App. 399 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1999

In State v. … Brown , 297 at 417.

Kleiger-Brown v. Brown

306 A.D.2d 482 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 2003

Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343, 349 [1999] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ryan v New York Tel. … Corp. v Lopez, 46 NY2d 481, 485 [1979]). Here, the father’s contention with respect to child support was determined in a prior appeal (see Brown v Brown, 239 AD2d 535 [1997]).

Brown v. Brown

19 N.J. Super. 432 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952

BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided May 13, 1952. *434 Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys for plaintiff. Messrs. … Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 , 65 S.Ct. 1092 , 89 L.Ed. 1577 ( U.S. Sup. Ct. 1945); Tonti v. Chadwick, 1 N.J. 531 ( Sup. Ct. 1949); Sprague v. Sprague, 131 N.J. Eq. 104 ( E. & A. 1941); Isserman v.

Brown v. Brown

652 S.W.2d 828 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1983

Cavanaugh v. Davis, 149 Tex. 573 , 235 S.W.2d 972 (Tex.1951); King v. Heirs & Beneficiaries of Watkins, 624 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1981, writ ref’d n.r.e.). … Brown wanted to adopt Gina, but it is also very evident that there never was any agreement to adopt Gina because of the natural mother’s constant and consistent refusal to consent to the adoption. As was said in King v.

Brown v. Brown

872 So. 2d 787 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · May 11, 2004

Owen Brown appeals from a judgment of the Chancery Court of Lowndes *788 County dismissing his Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the judgment of divorce rendered upon a complaint filed by his wife, Kay Brown. … Lindsey v. Lindsey, 818 So.2d 1191, 1192 (¶ 4) (Miss.2002). ¶ 8.

Brown v. Brown

615 S.E.2d 436 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 25, 2005

Brown v. Brown

203 A.D.2d 912 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1994

Consequently, plaintiff has no claim to a share of the appreciation (see, Price v Price, 69 NY2d 8, 18 ; Robertson v Robertson, 186 AD2d 124 ).

Brown v. Brown

680 So. 2d 1203 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1996

In Pitre v. … Noe v. Roussel, supra .

Brown v. Brown

121 Ga. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 30, 1970

Kimbrough v. Kimbrough, 99 Ga. 134 ( 25 SE 176 ); Langan v. Langan, 224 Ga. 399 ( 162 SE2d 405 ); Williams v. Thomas, 200 Ga. 767, 773 ( 38 SE2d 603 ). … See Studstill v. Aetna Cas. *90 &c. Co., 101 Ga. App. 766 ( 115 SE2d 374 ); Hamby v. Hamby, 107 Ga. App. 255 ( 129 SE2d 561 ). Submitted January 12, 1970 Decided January 30, 1970. Pittman & Kinney, H. E.

Roberts v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

719 A.2d 847 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1998

Mancini’s Bakery v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Leone), 155 Pa.Cmwlth. 641 , 625 A.2d 1308 (1993). … Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Volkswagen of America), 121 Pa.Cmwlth. 436 , 550 A.2d 1364 (1988).

Henderson Square Condominium Ass' v. LAB Townhomes, L.L.C.

2014 IL App (1st) 130764 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2014

Shorge Sato, of Brown Udell Pomerantz Delrahim, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellees. … Fichtel v. Board of Directors of the River Shore of Naperville Condominium Ass’n, 389 Ill.

Brown v. Brown

288 Pa. Super. 354 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1981

As we reiterated in Howard v. … Finally, Jean Lewniczak testified that she was at the Brown’s residence over a course of many years at least once or twice a week, that the appellee’s physical condition was dirty and “unkempt” (T. 167).

Brown v. Brown

104 N.C. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1991

Defendant answered, denying the allegations of fault and seeking a divorce from bed and board. … Graves v. Walston, 302 N.C; 332, 275 S.E.2d 485 (1981).

Brown v. Brown

10 Ariz. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · Nov 25, 1969

In Burk v. … In State v.

Brown v. Brown

51 So. 3d 1134 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 15, 2009

Brown v. Brown

359 Ill. App. 3d 1186 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 20, 2005

App.3d 1186 BROWN v. BROWN. No. 1-04-1060. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. July 20, 2005. Dismissed.

Brown v. Brown

51 So. 3d 1128 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 3, 2009