Case law

Brown v. Brown

245 S.W.2d 995 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 24, 1951

Eckford v. Knox, 67 Tex. 200 , 2 S.W. 372 ; Preusse v. McLerran, Tex.Civ.App., 282 S.W. 293 ; Bell v. Thomsen, 116 Tex. 325 , 273 S.W. 1109 . … Brown v. Payne, 142 Tex. 102 , 176 S.W.2d 306 ; Sanderson v. Sanderson, 130 Tex. 264 , 109 S.W.2d 744 .

Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of Supervisors

263 Cal. App. 2d 41 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1968

They rely upon Adler v. … Although the Brown Act artificially classifies it as a legislative body, a board of supervisors actually performs legislative, executive and even quasi-judicial functions. (Chinn v.

Brown v. Brown

521 S.W.2d 730 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 9, 1975

CURTISS BROWN, Justice. This is a divorce case. Lisa McArdle Brown (appellee) filed suit for divorce on June 20, 1974. Robert Dwayne Brown (appellant) was served with citation on or about September 3, 1974. … Brown then perfected this appeal.

Indiana University v. Hartwell

174 Ind. App. 325 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1977

Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. (1940), 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N.E.2d 399 ; State ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd. (1951), 230 Ind. 1 , 101 N.E.2d 60 . … Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd., supra and Schakel v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Division (1968), 142 Ind. *331 App. 475, 235 N.E.2d 497 .

Brown v. Brown

76 Ark. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 27, 2002

Appellant, David Brown, XJ^and appellee, Janet Brown, were divorced in 1993. In 2001, Janet filed a motion for contempt and for an increase in child support. … In Tucker v. Tucker, 74 Ark.

Cook County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal Board

403 Ill. App. 3d 139 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 30, 2010

IX, §4(a); Walsh v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 181 Ill. 2d 228, 234 , 692 N.E.2d 260 (1998). … See Du Page County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 284 Ill. App. 3d 649, 654-55 , 672 N.E.2d 1309 (1996).

Brown v. Brown

2021 Ohio 1932 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2021

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2021-Ohio-1932.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY JASON R. … BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 14-20-24 v. MEAGHAN J. BROWN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Brown v. Brown

520 S.W.2d 571 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1975

Whatley v. Whatley, 493 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1973, no writ); Harris v. Lebow, supra; Johnson v. Brown, 218 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1948, writ ref’d n. r. e.). … As to Cooper v.

Brown v. Brown

79 So. 3d 190 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 2012

See Holden Cove, Inc. v. 4 Mac Holdings, Inc., 948 So.2d 1041, 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (rejecting an irreparable harm argument as being premature and speculative). … See Jackson v. Computer Sci. Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Certiorari jurisdiction does not arise unless the court first establishes irreparable harm.”).

Brown v. Brown

31 So. 3d 532 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2010

Loftice v. Loftice, supra. … See, e.g., Skannal v.

Brown v. Brown

255 So. 3d 313 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 11, 2018

Brown v. Brown

379 S.C. 271 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 28, 2008

See Pool v. … Brown v. Brown, Op. No.2008-UP-051 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Jan. 14, 2008) (unpublished opinion). 2 . We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Brown v. Brown

2013 Ohio 3456 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2013

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] … [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] I. The Relocation Restriction {¶ 2} The parties, Holli and Troy Brown, are the mother and father of three minor children.

Brown v. Brown

180 So. 2d 106 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1965

180 So.2d 106 (1965) Barbara Anderson BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald T. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10448. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 28, 1965. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1965. … Estopinal v. Estopinal, 223 La. 485 , 66 So.2d 311 (1953) and McCaa v. McCaa (La.App., 2 Cir., 1964) 163 So.2d 434 , writ refused 246 La. 579 , 165 So.2d 480 . Mrs.

Brown v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 896 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2017

Hartog, 85 NY2d at 48 ; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Dinoto v Dinoto, 97 AD3d 529, 530 [2012]; Alper v Alper, 77 AD3d 694, 695 [2010]; Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008]; Scharfman v Scharfman, 19 AD3d 474 [2005 … Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to a share of that appreciation (see Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36 [1995]; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Hymowitz v Hymowitz, 119 AD3d 736, 739 [2014]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d at 667

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1976

award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where the true facts as to finances and standards of living of the parties can be ascertained, and where the defendant’s right to alimony can be finally determined (see Tobias v

Brown v. Brown

158 So. 2d 305 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1964

158 So.2d 305 (1963) Tom BROWN et al. v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana. No. 5947. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. … See Adams v. Review Board (1951), 121 Ind.App. 273 , 98 N.E.2d 681 , Bartlett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act (Connecticut, 1955), 142 Conn. 497 , 115 A.2d 671 , Cameron v.

Brown v. Brown

187 So. 3d 538 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2016

Brown’s exception of no cause of action. Appellate courts conduct a de novo review óf a trial court’s ruling granting an exception of'ho cause of action as the exception presents questions of law. St. Pierre v. … See Melancon v. D & M Enterprises, 95-0644 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/28/95) , 662 So.2d 54 ; DeBaillon v. Consolidated Operating Co., 07-1117 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/30/08) , 975 So.2d 682 ; and Stroscher v.

Brown v. Brown

91 Ky. 639 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Feb 21, 1889

Brown, on the 9th day of February, 1878, conveyed to his brother, the appellant, W. S. Brown, all his property, consisting of real estate lying in Marion county, Ky. The-conveyance was by deed, which was duly recorded. … (Yankey v. Sweeney, &c., 85 Ky., 55 .)

Klug v. BRIDGEWATER TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

407 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2009

v. … We emphasize that a planning board is not required to accept the testimony of any expert. El Shaer v.