Case law

Brown v. State

334 S.W.3d 789 · Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · Mar 9, 2011

Darwin Brown appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. The indictment contained a deadly weapon enhancement, and three enhancement paragraphs alleging prior felony convictions. … V, § 8.

Brown v. Commonwealth

61 Ky. 221 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jun 4, 1863

CHIEF JUSTICE DUVALL delivered the opinion op the coukt: Thé summons requiring the defendant to show cause why the Commonwealth should not have judgment lor the amount of the forfeited recognizance was regularly executed on Brown

Glickman v. Brown

21 Mass. App. Ct. 229 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 16, 1985

The plaintiffs’ claim is governed by the versions of c. 93A, §§ 9 and 11, which were in effect at the time Brown made the misrepresentations. See Murphy v. Charlestown Sav. Bank, 380 Mass. 738, 743 (1980); Swanson v. … App. 1981); Starfish Condominium Assn. v. Yorkridge Serv. Corp., 295 Md. 693, 698, 703-705, 706-708 (1983); Siller v.

People v. Brown

2020 IL App (1st) 180826 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 18, 2020

People v. Rouse, 2020 IL App (1st) 170491, ¶ 46 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984)). … People v. Campos, 2019 IL App (1st) 152613, ¶ 46.

Brown v. Commonwealth

198 Ky. 663 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Apr 17, 1923

Mickey v. Commonwealth, 9th Bush 593; Minniard v. Commonwealth, 158 Ky. 210 ; Clary v. Commonwealth, 163 Ky. 48 ; Commonwealth v. Stites, 190 Ky. 402 . … Richardson came with his taxi to a certain meat shop where appellant was to meet him; at that time there was no liquor in the car; appellant boarded the car and said, “Let’s go.” They started for Hazel.

Brown v. Bouse

43 Misc. 72 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Feb 15, 1904

Hurry v. Coffin, 11 Daly, 180 . … Mohlman Co. v. Landwehr, 83 N. Y. Supp. 1073 ), as the defendant appeared in court although he defaulted in answering.

People v. Brown

106 A.D.3d 927 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 2013

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion without a hearing (see People v Pitts, 4 NY3d 303, 311 [2005]; People v Bush, 90 AD3d 945, 945 [2011]; People v Perry, 89 AD3d 1114,1114-1115 [2011]; People … v Hai Guang Zheng, 69 AD3d 878, 879 [2010]; People v Fuentes, 44 AD3d 871, 871 [2007]; People v King, 38 AD3d 1066, 1067 [2007]; People v Brown, 36 AD3d 961, 961-962 [2007]).

Brown v. Zaken

204 A.3d 1061 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2019

People v. Brown

2015 IL App (1st) 140508 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 23, 2016

Brown, 2015 IL App (1st) 140508 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption JOSEPH BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. … People v.

People v. Brown

110 A.D.3d 730 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2013

supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law, since, at the time he was resentenced, he had not yet completed the sentence of imprisonment originally imposed upon him (see People v … Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630 [2011]; People v Quinones, 103 AD3d 756 [2013]; People v Lovett, 102 AD3d 812 [2013]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543 [2011]).

State v. Brown

915 S.W.2d 3 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 25, 1995

State v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 576, 579 (Tem.CrimA.pp.1991). … In Batson v.

Travers v. Brown

72 A.D.3d 979 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 2010

Bank v McCarty, 149 NY 71, 80 [1896]) that the purported signature of the decedent on the deed was a forgery (see Bryant v Bryant, 58 AD3d 496, 496 [2009]). … In any event, the witness was not a person “interested in the event” within the meaning of the statute (see Smith v Kuhn, 221 AD2d 620, 621 [1995]; Matter of Murray v Smith, 155 AD2d 963, 963 [1989]).

Brown v. State

324 Ga. App. 718 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 14, 2013

See Kelley v. State, 308 Ga. App. 418, 420-421 ( 707 SE2d 619 ) (2011); Brown v. State, 295 Ga. App. 542, 544 ( 672 SE2d 514 ) (2009). … See Price v.

Brown v. State

188 Ga. App. 184 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 6, 1988

[United States v. Smith, 799 F2d 704, 709 (11th Cir. 1986)]” Tarwid v. State, 184 Ga. App. 853, 854 ( 363 SE2d 63 ). … See United States v. Miller, 821 F2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987); United States v. Smith, 799 F2d 704, supra; United States v. Thompson, 712 F2d 1356 (11th Cir. 1983); Tarwid v. State, 184 Ga. App. 853 , supra.

Boynton v. Brown

164 S.W. 893 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 1914

Brown, mayor, and Jack W. Neal, George W. Saunders, F. A. Chapa, John W. Warren, U. H. Rische, Robert F. Uhr, W. L. Hoefgen, J. R. Baldwin, Albert Steves, Sr., J. R. Lambert, C. T. Fincham, and Leo M. J. … Ewing v. Cohen, 63 Tex. 482 . In the case of Shook v. Journeay, 149 S.

People v. Brown

62 Cal. App. 96 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1923

I will ask you again whether you were in Brown's room.' … He said, 'No,' which he says, 'I asked Brown to come outside'; and he says, 'After I come in off that little porch my back was to Brown's door, and Brown sat on his table in his bathrobe and shot me from the back.'

Brown v. Boren

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1999

In Protective Equity Trust #83, Ltd. v. … As explained in Roth v.

State v. Brown

131 Conn. App. 275 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Sep 6, 2011

State v. Wright, 58 Conn. App. 136, 148 , 752 A.2d 1147 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 907 , 755 A.2d 884 (2000). *284 The defendant argues that Carol Brown’s testimony should have been admitted as lay opinion. … State v.

Pillitteri v. Brown

165 S.W.3d 715 · Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Jun 30, 2005

Products, Inc. v. Gammage, 668 S.W.2d 319, 321-22 (Tex.1984); Gillum v. Republic Health Corp., 778 S.W.2d 558, 562 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1989, no writ). … Ass’n v. Welch, 783 S.W.2d 668, 671 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1989, no writ).

Wray v. Brown

155 Ky. 757 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Nov 13, 1913

In Smith v. … It is true that in the cases of O’Daniel v. O’Daniel, 88 Ky., 185 ; Talbott v. Thorn, 91 Ky., 417 , and Hansford v.